Visions of Politics (Volume 1) pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Quentin Skinner is Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Christ's College.
- 剑桥学派
- 政治思想史
- 政治哲学
- Quentin_Skinner
- 斯金纳
- 方法论
- 思想史
- 政治学
The first of three volumes of essays by Quentin Skinner, one of the world's leading intellectual historians. This collection includes some of his most important philosophical and methodological statements written over the past four decades, each carefully revised for publication in this form. In a series of seminal essays Professor Skinner sets forth the intellectual principles that inform his work. Writing as a practising historian, he considers the theoretical difficulties inherent in the pursuit of knowledge and interpretation, and elucidates the methodology which finds its expression in his two successive volumes. All of Professor Skinner's work is characterised by philosophical power, limpid clarity, and elegance of exposition; these essays, many of which are now recognised classics, provide a fascinating and convenient digest of the development of his thought. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
具体描述
读后感
斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
评分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
评分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
评分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
评分斯金纳这本关于方法论的书，我关注两个主题。 一， 社会意义和对社会行为的解释 我过去理解的韦伯和涂尔干之争，斯金纳将其解释为anti-naturalists对naturalists。韦伯的Verstehen或涂尔干的positivism，争论主要在社会科学领域。斯金纳是历史学家，在历史哲学中，也存在狄尔...
用户评价
Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory；57-89 （二十餘歲發表）
评分The dispute between the Cambridge School and the Straussians arises not so much from different methods of interpretation as from their contrasting aims in reading the ancients. Strauss reads them to learn from their wisdom, Skinner reads them to congratulate himself on his own intelligence.
评分补标：读于2018秋 “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory；57-89”应当是这本书里最重要的方法论的文章。Skinner二十多岁时的锐气和现在非常不同，以至于他还需要之后写一篇文章矫正说自己之前的言辞太过于锋利——里面有不少snarky的玩笑。Skinner关注的是写作者的意图，可以说是以史为鉴看春秋笔法。
评分Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory；57-89 （二十餘歲發表）
评分启发颇大。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有