Jürgen Habermas is Professor Emeritus of Philosophy at the University of Frankfurt and Professor of Philosophy at Northwestern University. He was recently awarded the 2004 Kyoto Prize for Arts and Philosophy by the Inamori Foundation. The Kyoto Prize is an international award to honor those who have contributed significantly to the scientific, cultural, and spiritual betterment of mankind.
This is Jurgen Habermas's most concrete historical-sociological book and one of the key contributions to political thought in the postwar period. It will be a revelation to those who have known Habermas only through his theoretical writing to find his later interests in problems of legitimation and communication foreshadowed in this lucid study of the origins, nature, and evolution of public opinion in democratic societies.
The connections drew between different social sectors are glaringly characteristic of this book, as a sociological classic. In terms of horizontally societal sectors constructing or related to public sphere, the structural complex indicated by Habermas co...
评分 评分我读这本书最开始的目的,是为了解答内心中的一个疑问:国内是否存在公共领域? 起先我认为,中国直到互联网普及年代才诞生公共领域。“微博断案”虽然是一句调侃,但是它表明,在以社交网络媒体为主的地方,公众开始正式插手政府的权力分配。 但随阅读的深入,我又改变了想法...
读得非常痛苦的一本。。。
评分看到最后一页,一个不小心,把之前辛苦做的读书笔记全删了。难道上天要让我上课的时候再细读一次么。好吧。public sphere,之于中国好陌生啊,沙龙和茶馆可相提并论么?封建尾巴,国家王权退却,市民空间(商业、劳动、家庭)兴起,后又经现代化的过程,公与私领域互侵,及至福利国家,似乎以公权获胜为结局,大众传媒操作舆论,使得传统定义的public opinion消失,私人的发声需通过新形成的利益集团间的博弈体现。政治以非政治的方式延续。个中提到英国律师advocacy让位于利益集团和党派政治的斗争,兼具universality和rationality的真正的public opinion在议会中丧失。想起何师说的:律师本来就不是为了利益,而是公益的。应该回到本初。
评分Kantian!
评分Kantian!
评分理想主义的Habermas啊,大部分情况下辩证地梳理了资本主义社会公共领域和私人领域的转型,which is inevitable,强调critical-rational debate及其consensus,时刻提防权力机构的侵犯和公共舆论的假象。他真的希望所有人都可以做到critical,也真的相信有这样的未来?不过对high art和film的critique太操之过急,对Mill的解读太极端感觉完全忽视On Liberty第二章,对现代建筑变化对转型的影响更是不知道哪儿来的source
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有