If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics or in philosophy of language, this is it.
Ever since the publication of its original version, Naming and Necessity has had great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of reference, in particular of naming, and of identity. From a critique of the dominant tendency to assimilate names to descriptions and more generally to treat their reference as a function of their Fregean sense, surprisingly deep and widespread consequences may be drawn. The largely discredited distinction between accidental and essential properties, both of individual things (including people) and of kinds of things, is revived. So is a consequent view of science as what seeks out the essences of natural kinds. Traditional objections to such views are dealt with by sharpening distinctions between epistemic and metaphysical necessity; in particular by the startling admission of necessary a posteriori truths. From these, in particular from identity statements using rigid designators whether of things or of kinds, further remarkable consequences are drawn for the natures of things, of people, and of kinds; strong objections follow, for example to identity versions of materialism as a theory of the mind.
This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here published with a substantial new Preface by the author.
Saul Aaron Kripke is an American philosopher and logician now emeritus from Princeton and professor of philosophy at CUNY Graduate Center. He has been immensely influential in a number of fields related to logic and philosophy of language. Much of his work remains unpublished or exists only as tape-recordings and privately circulated manuscripts. He is nonetheless widely regarded as the foremost philosopher of the turn of the millenium, and was the winner of the 2001 Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy.
本书在不少前辈里得到较高的评价,可晚辈看了半个多月,实在头痛。打听一下,原来都看的是英文版...... 怒了,译本读起来太吃力了,难读到好几次我以为我是在看蓝猫!而事实上这翻译的却像蓝波! 宁愿看英文了,虽然水平很菜,那也认了,起码不能让中文白痴忽悠了自己
评分本书在不少前辈里得到较高的评价,可晚辈看了半个多月,实在头痛。打听一下,原来都看的是英文版...... 怒了,译本读起来太吃力了,难读到好几次我以为我是在看蓝猫!而事实上这翻译的却像蓝波! 宁愿看英文了,虽然水平很菜,那也认了,起码不能让中文白痴忽悠了自己
评分 评分绪言第5页 后来我终于认识到—正是这种认识导致了我在前面提到的 1963 至 1964 年间的工作—对认为通名之间有必然同一性的这种广为接受的观点是不正确的加以反对…… 应为“后来我终于认识到……那种广为接受的、反对通名之间的必然同一性的预设是不正确的”。 正文第95页 如果...
评分毕业那段时间把200来页的naming and necessity读完。在这本书中,作者Kripke先是澄清了一些有关指称的问题,接着举了一些例子来说明先验的不一定是必然的,而必然的不一定是先验的。而在最后一节,Kripke才将他在这些逻辑学上的观点应用到心灵哲学这个领域中来。 一开始我还真...
Rereading Kripke's groundbreaking classic now. I'd say very "Platonic"
评分浓浓经院风……无感
评分懒得看Preface和Addenda了,感觉一些论证诉诸的直觉不够可靠,de re和de dicto我总是想不清楚。哎 看二手文献去了
评分http://socialistica.lenin.ru/analytic/txt/k/kripke_1.htm
评分懒得看Preface和Addenda了,感觉一些论证诉诸的直觉不够可靠,de re和de dicto我总是想不清楚。哎 看二手文献去了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有