One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, 'we have no theory'. Frankfurt, one of the world's most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all. Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner's capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.
Harry G. Frankfurt is a professor of philosophy emeritus at Princeton University. His books include The Reasons of Love; Necessity, Volition, and Love; and The Importance of What We Care About. He lives in Princeton, New Jersey.
扯談與無稽之談 (哈里·G·法蘭克福著.南方朔譯.論扯淡[M].南京:譯林出版社,2008.1) “扯談”似當作“扯淡” 論政完全用學術規格 (哈里·G·法蘭克福著.南方朔譯.論扯淡[M].南京:譯林出版社,2008.10) “論政”當作“論證” 市態炎涼 (哈里·G·法蘭克...
评分Bullshit, Mr. Frankfurt! 刘未鹏 /文 链接:http://blog.csdn.net/pongba/archive/2008/03/09/2160467.aspx It was literally like stepping on a load of bullshit (at first I was going for “crap”, but then I thought it would be too impolite not to use the word ...
评分 评分这本书的名字会让人感兴趣,那是很自然的事情。因为我们都不可避免地认识到这样一点:我们几乎一直都在说些没有什么意义的话。 海德格尔也曾定义过这样一种叫做闲谈的东西,这种闲谈遮蔽了人本真的存在。至于我们为什么要如此说些不着边际的话,照海德格尔的意思,人们这么做无...
评分"Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial-notoriously less stable and less inherent than the natures of other things. and insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit."
评分"Our natures are, indeed, elusively insubstantial-notoriously less stable and less inherent than the natures of other things. and insofar as this is the case, sincerity itself is bullshit."
评分喜欢作者一本正经的说废话的样子
评分在Strand底楼一取书爬梯上坐着读完了(我是有多懒)最后大概说是我们inherently不稳定,对自己也一无所知,所以对自己sincere也不能称之为诚实…what a不可知论。想到牛津本科哲学系的面试题deceive,lie和cheat之间的不同…
评分这本书的学术味道很浓,并不像标题暗示的那么有趣。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有