One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, 'we have no theory'. Frankfurt, one of the world's most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all. Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner's capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.
Harry G. Frankfurt is a professor of philosophy emeritus at Princeton University. His books include The Reasons of Love; Necessity, Volition, and Love; and The Importance of What We Care About. He lives in Princeton, New Jersey.
这也许是一个难以接受的现实,但无法否认的是,我们生活在一个充满废话的社会里。 有些时候,废话是人际沟通的润滑剂,没有这些废话,大家都会觉得很尴尬。我们可以设想这样一个情境:你与一个点头之交同乘一趟电梯,除你们之外没有其他人,你会说些什么呢?天气、着装、要去...
评分花了大约两个小时看完《论扯谈》。结论是:文章不错,书就算了吧! 这个时代缺少废话少的作者,能够如本书作者这样以简洁明了风格的人进行学术研究的人实在太少了。作者的结论也如此简洁明了: ”扯谈不是说谎,却是真理最大的敌人。因为说谎的人知道何者为真,却讲的是假话...
评分扯談與無稽之談 (哈里·G·法蘭克福著.南方朔譯.論扯淡[M].南京:譯林出版社,2008.1) “扯談”似當作“扯淡” 論政完全用學術規格 (哈里·G·法蘭克福著.南方朔譯.論扯淡[M].南京:譯林出版社,2008.10) “論政”當作“論證” 市態炎涼 (哈里·G·法蘭克...
评分人为什么要扯淡?当形势需要人们去讲他自己也不知所云的话时,当一个人有责任或机会,针对某个话题去发表超过了他对这个话题了解时,扯淡就开始了。 读《论扯淡》到这里,不禁拍案称奇:这说的不就是公司面试么?或者反过来说,面试不就(大多)是扯淡么?或者中肯地说,面试...
评分人为什么要扯淡?当形势需要人们去讲他自己也不知所云的话时,当一个人有责任或机会,针对某个话题去发表超过了他对这个话题了解时,扯淡就开始了。 读《论扯淡》到这里,不禁拍案称奇:这说的不就是公司面试么?或者反过来说,面试不就(大多)是扯淡么?或者中肯地说,面试...
很小的一本
评分小书虽然意外地畅销,但是我觉得好像还不如frankfurt的访谈们好看,最重要的问题其实被悬置了。bullshit对真相的毫不在乎,使其比谎言更有害,这似乎是全书的核心,但书中的很多例证似乎正与之相左。
评分这本书的学术味道很浓,并不像标题暗示的那么有趣。
评分一句简评:bullshit on bullshit... 本来bullshit是社会学探讨的领域@sarcophagus ,分哲的哲学家凑什么热闹……虽然是小册子,但可看做又一例分哲思路做日常语言的失败案例。
评分比谎言更可怕,论肌浃髓难以杜绝
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有