When Edward VI died in 1553, the extraordinary fact was that there was no one left to claim the title of king of England. For the first time, England would have a reigning queen—but the question was which one: Katherine of Aragon's daughter, Mary; Anne Boleyn's daughter, Elizabeth; or one of their cousins, Lady Jane Grey or Mary, Queen of Scots. But female rule in England also had a past. Four hundred years before Edward's death, Matilda, daughter of Henry I and granddaughter of William the Conqueror, came tantalizingly close to securing the crown for herself. And between the twelfth and fifteenth centuries three more exceptional women—Eleanor of Aquitaine, Isabella of France, and Margaret of Anjou—discovered how much was possible if pre-sumptions of male rule were not confronted so explicitly—and just how quickly they might be vilified as "she-wolves" for their pains. The stories of these women, told here in all their vivid detail, expose the paradox that female heirs to the Tudor throne had no choice but to negotiate. Man was the head of woman, and the king was the head of all. How, then, could royal power lie in female hands?
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
其實是一本簡單描述瞭幾個時期英格蘭曆史的書。錶麵雖給人注重“女王/皇後”描寫的錯覺，實際有些關於人物主角的評價/猜測總讓人覺得空口無憑。如果僅當曆史書看似乎又不夠細節和全麵，不過倒是讓我對這段曆史産生瞭深厚興趣...曆史果然是權謀小說的最好素材啊。
评分其實是一本簡單描述瞭幾個時期英格蘭曆史的書。錶麵雖給人注重“女王/皇後”描寫的錯覺，實際有些關於人物主角的評價/猜測總讓人覺得空口無憑。如果僅當曆史書看似乎又不夠細節和全麵，不過倒是讓我對這段曆史産生瞭深厚興趣...曆史果然是權謀小說的最好素材啊。
评分其實是一本簡單描述瞭幾個時期英格蘭曆史的書。錶麵雖給人注重“女王/皇後”描寫的錯覺，實際有些關於人物主角的評價/猜測總讓人覺得空口無憑。如果僅當曆史書看似乎又不夠細節和全麵，不過倒是讓我對這段曆史産生瞭深厚興趣...曆史果然是權謀小說的最好素材啊。
评分其實是一本簡單描述瞭幾個時期英格蘭曆史的書。錶麵雖給人注重“女王/皇後”描寫的錯覺，實際有些關於人物主角的評價/猜測總讓人覺得空口無憑。如果僅當曆史書看似乎又不夠細節和全麵，不過倒是讓我對這段曆史産生瞭深厚興趣...曆史果然是權謀小說的最好素材啊。
评分其實是一本簡單描述瞭幾個時期英格蘭曆史的書。錶麵雖給人注重“女王/皇後”描寫的錯覺，實際有些關於人物主角的評價/猜測總讓人覺得空口無憑。如果僅當曆史書看似乎又不夠細節和全麵，不過倒是讓我對這段曆史産生瞭深厚興趣...曆史果然是權謀小說的最好素材啊。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有