‘On the outside, [the foreigners] seem intractable, but inside they are cowardly. . . Although there have been a few ups-and-downs, the situation as a whole is under control.’
In October 1839, a few months after the Chinese Imperial Commissioner, Lin Zexu, dispatched these confident words to his emperor, a cabinet meeting in Windsor voted to fight Britain’s first Opium War (1839-42) with China. The conflict turned out to be rich in tragicomedy: in bureaucratic fumblings, military missteps, political opportunism and collaboration. Yet over the past 170 years, this strange tale of misunderstanding, incompetence and compromise has become the founding myth of modern Chinese nationalism: the start of China’s heroic struggle against a Western conspiracy to destroy the country with opium and gunboat diplomacy.
Beginning with the dramas of the war itself, Julia Lovell explores its causes and consequences and, through this larger narrative, interweaves the curious stories of opium’s promoters and attackers. The Opium War is both the story of modern China – starting from this first conflict with the West – and an analysis of the country’s contemporary self-image. It explores how China’s national myths mould its interactions with the outside world, how public memory is spun to serve the present; and how delusion and prejudice have bedevilled its relationship with the modern West.
It explores how China's national myths mould its interactions with the outside world, how public memory is spun to serve the present; and how delusion and prejudice have bedevilled its relationship with the modern West.
Julia Lovell has worked at Birkbeck since 2007. Before then, she was Junior Research Fellow at Queens’ College, Cambridge. She completed her undergraduate and graduate studies at Emmanuel College, Cambridge; she also studied for a year at the Hopkins-Nanjing Centre for Chinese Studies. She has translated many works, as well as writing insightful works into the history of China.
She has written articles in the Guardian, the London Times and the Economist on China.
1840年英国远洋舰队进攻广东珠江口,标志着鸦片战争的爆发,这一事件被后世历史学家评价为具有重大意义的近代中国的转折点。中国人眼中的鸦片战争是一部充满屈辱和剥削的血泪史,是西方列强贪婪、自私、残忍、蛮横所导致。而西方世界把这件事评价为中国人狭隘、骄横、愚昧、自...
評分﹣能在2017年12月31日晚上讀完這書,很是高興。能在年前完成一本不錯的書,怎麼說也是一種運氣。 ﹣上週去逛樂文時看到這書,剛巧之前讀了談英國殖民政府中譯者相關的書,有提到諸如郭實臘(本書則叫郭士立)等人在鴉片戰爭中的狀況,不如就買這書來一讀。之前應該在一些網站...
評分引发鸦片战争的表象是中英贸易的失衡,实质是两种社会制度的较量,根源是东西方文化甚至文明的对冲。作为中国近代史的开端,鸦片战争的意义影响至今,对国人来讲,既满怀对西方殖民主义的愤恨,也饱含对西方文明进步的憧憬,更怀揣中华复兴之伟愿。坊间于这部书褒贬鲜明,且贬...
評分书的一个尴尬是卡在中西视角之间, 我觉得两头都有问题,个人建议是不值得读,如果要读的话,序言,然后中国看十六章,外国人看十七章同时可以考虑十八章,如果是思想史的爱好者,那么不用看了,太浅。 分为两部分,鸦片战争的前前后后,以及国人如何看待鸦片战争(对心态的影...
評分古今带路党的逻辑起点谬误 ———读《鸦片战争》有感 (律劳卑认为)中国的民众“没准会盼望这样一支军队的到来,来把他们从最专制的压迫制度下解放出来……可以肯定,把他们抓在我们的手里,是一个仁慈的行动,而且不是什么难事”。 ————哈哈,带路党看来历史悠久,古今几...
論文用
评分這書的評分偏低瞭吧……就憑大量的英國方麵的資料就值高分瞭,更彆說對許多研究潮流的展現瞭(比如生活史,內亞視角等等)
评分讓我大開眼界、茅塞頓開的書。與以往所讀的中國方麵關於同一主題的記述相比,我終於發現我麵對的不再是那些或者高尚、或者邪惡的戲劇化的陌生身影,而是我日常所見、所聞、所熟知的中國人瞭。歷史是什麼?歷史是現實的人的思維和活動,在時間和空間上的擴展。感謝作者,讓我重新在歷史中發現瞭現實的人,解瞭我多年來的疑惑——不僅是對真實所發生的事的疑惑,也是對讓我疑惑的敘述是如何產生的疑惑。The history finally makes sense to me. 真希望這本書有機會能不刪減地翻譯成中文,對學界必然是大有震動的。好吧,我知道這是癡心妄想,至少在我能目見的未來。
评分非常全麵詳細,信息量很大。尤其是對第一次鴉片戰爭的描寫,中英雙方的資料,官方的文件和普通民眾的迴憶都有。當時各種利益集團摻和在其中,到瞭現在教科書上直接簡化成瞭清政府和英國,就完全不是那麼迴事兒瞭
评分衝著作者翻譯過阿q正傳等魯迅作品纔買的,作者對中西方鴉片戰爭態度和觀點不同下瞭很大的功夫,即瞭解中國近現代史的混亂錶述,也有西方戰爭期間一手資料,很有趣。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有