图书标签: 基督教  历史  Christianity  理论基础  文化探讨  中世纪  westart  relig   

喜欢 Christian Materiality 的读者还喜欢

Bynum这本书精彩极了，副标题虽为essay，却是当今少有的具备理论推进意识的大局观研究。虽然Bynum强调她的历史化分析和现代理论之间的区别，个人倒是认为，这本书里诸多关于材料的思考对现当代艺术的理论和实践都有很强的参照意义，甚至比很多当代分析本身都切中要害。

Bynum这本书精彩极了，副标题虽为essay，却是当今少有的具备理论推进意识的大局观研究。虽然Bynum强调她的历史化分析和现代理论之间的区别，个人倒是认为，这本书里诸多关于材料的思考对现当代艺术的理论和实践都有很强的参照意义，甚至比很多当代分析本身都切中要害。

有趣的點有很多，看了這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白了Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一点就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.

有趣的點有很多，看了這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白了Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一点就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.

有趣的點有很多，看了這本書再去Met Cloisters的時候能想的就會成倍增長。對我來說最有幫助的是講明白了Gregorian sense of image as that which gestures toward but does not literally contain the divine. 這一點和密宗裡的contained efficacy有很大區別。再一点就是Bynum talks about medieval art as showing off its "stuff" as "stuff", as opposed to the mimetic qualities of renaissance art.