Beyond Adversary Democracy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Jane J. Mansbridge is professor of political science at Northwestern University. She is also on the faculty of the university's Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research.
- 社会学
- 民主化与公民文化
- 政治学
- Anthropology
- 小说
- politics
- POLITICS
- Grassroots
"Beyond Adversary Democracy should be read by everyone concerned with democratic theory and practice."—Carol Pateman, Politics
"Sociologists recurrently complain about how seldom it is that we produce books that combine serious theorizing about important issues of public policy with original and sensitive field research. Several rounds of enthusiastic applause, then, are due Jane Mansbridge . . . for having produced a dense and well written book whose subject is nothing less ambitious than the theory of democracy and its problems of equality, solidarity, and consensus. Beyond Adversary Democracy, however, is not simply a work of political theory; Mansbridge explores her abstract subject matter by close studies (using ethnographic, documentary, and questionnaire methods) of two small actual democracies operating at their most elemental American levels (1) a New England town meeting ("Selby," Vermont) and (2) an urban crisis center ("Helpline"), whose 41 employees shared a New Left-Counterculture belief in participatory democracy and consensual decision-making. [Mansbridge] is a force to contend with. It is in our common interest that she be widely read."—Bennett M. Berger, Contemporary Sociology
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
The writing as an ethnography is intricate and tortuous, with a good sense of balance between self-interested actors struggling for benefits and collective efforts in constructing the common good. But the theory is just crappy, with naive and superficial summary of constitutional democracy, and the ignorance of "scaling up" in modernization.
评分The writing as an ethnography is intricate and tortuous, with a good sense of balance between self-interested actors struggling for benefits and collective efforts in constructing the common good. But the theory is just crappy, with naive and superficial summary of constitutional democracy, and the ignorance of "scaling up" in modernization.
评分The writing as an ethnography is intricate and tortuous, with a good sense of balance between self-interested actors struggling for benefits and collective efforts in constructing the common good. But the theory is just crappy, with naive and superficial summary of constitutional democracy, and the ignorance of "scaling up" in modernization.
评分The writing as an ethnography is intricate and tortuous, with a good sense of balance between self-interested actors struggling for benefits and collective efforts in constructing the common good. But the theory is just crappy, with naive and superficial summary of constitutional democracy, and the ignorance of "scaling up" in modernization.
评分The writing as an ethnography is intricate and tortuous, with a good sense of balance between self-interested actors struggling for benefits and collective efforts in constructing the common good. But the theory is just crappy, with naive and superficial summary of constitutional democracy, and the ignorance of "scaling up" in modernization.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有