The Supreme Court is one of the most extraordinary institutions in our system of government. Charged with the responsibility of interpreting the Constitution, the nine unelected justices of the Court have the awesome power to strike down laws enacted by our elected representatives. Why does the public accept the Court’s decisions as legitimate and follow them, even when those decisions are highly unpopular? What must the Court do to maintain the public’s faith? How can the Court help make our democracy work? These are the questions that Justice Stephen Breyer tackles in this groundbreaking book.
Today we assume that when the Court rules, the public will obey. But Breyer declares that we cannot take the public’s confidence in the Court for granted. He reminds us that at various moments in our history, the Court’s decisions were disobeyed or ignored. And through investigations of past cases, concerning the Cherokee Indians, slavery, and Brown v. Board of Education, he brilliantly captures the steps—and the missteps—the Court took on the road to establishing its legitimacy as the guardian of the Constitution.
Justice Breyer discusses what the Court must do going forward to maintain that public confidence and argues for interpreting the Constitution in a way that works in practice. He forcefully rejects competing approaches that look exclusively to the Constitution’s text or to the eighteenth-century views of the framers. Instead, he advocates a pragmatic approach that applies unchanging constitutional values to ever-changing circumstances—an approach that will best demonstrate to the public that the Constitution continues to serve us well. The Court, he believes, must also respect the roles that other actors—such as the president, Congress, administrative agencies, and the states—play in our democracy, and he emphasizes the Court’s obligation to build cooperative relationships with them.
Finally, Justice Breyer examines the Court’s recent decisions concerning the detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, contrasting these decisions with rulings concerning the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. He uses these cases to show how the Court can promote workable government by respecting the roles of other constitutional actors without compromising constitutional principles.
Making Our Democracy Work is a tour de force of history and philosophy, offering an original approach to interpreting the Constitution that judges, lawyers, and scholars will look to for many years to come. And it further establishes Justice Breyer as one of the Court’s greatest intellectuals and a leading legal voice of our time.
Stephen Gerald Breyer (pronounced /ˈbraɪər/; born August 15, 1938) is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994, and known for his pragmatic approach to constitutional law, Breyer is generally associated with the more liberal side of the Court.[1]
Following a clerkship with Supreme Court Associate Justice Arthur Goldberg in 1964, Breyer became well-known as a law professor and lecturer at Harvard Law School starting in 1967. There he specialized in the area of administrative law, writing a number of influential text books that remain in use today. He held other prominent positions before being nominated for the Supreme Court, including special assistant to the United States Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, and assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Force in 1973.
In his 2005 book Active Liberty, Breyer made his first attempt to systematically lay out his views on legal theory, arguing that the judiciary should seek to resolve issues to encourage popular participation in governmental decisions.
《法官能为民主做什么》的编辑校对错误 《法官能为民主做什么》2012年1版1刷中,有不少小的错误,顺手摘出于此。 页34行7,“又能向求谁助”应为“又能向谁求助”。 页39行4,“强者措施”似应为“强制措施”。 页48行21,“诉求请求”似应为“诉讼请求”。 页77行3,“...
评分 评分在《法官能为民主做什么》一书开头不久,作者斯蒂芬·布雷耶大法官提到他所经历的一个细节:一位非洲大法官困惑而羡慕地问他,“为什么法院说什么,美国人都会照办?”这个貌似天真的问题问得实在深刻,问出了很多国家——尤其是法治不健全的第三世界国家——民众的...
评分作者自云,写作本书是为了增进普通民众对最高法院的理解。作者用清晰易懂的笔体来撰写这本书。在美国,法院是宪法的最终解释者,这种权威(authority)来自何处?在本部分,作者引用了莎士比亚的《亨利四世》,当Glendower咆哮道“我可以召唤地下的幽魂”,Hotspur说“我也会...
值得看一下。其他感触:1)美国人法律意识长期淡薄:宪法生效一个半世纪后还有政府官员和法院决定对着干,2)美国人权历史一片黑暗:撕毁和印第安人的协议,把人家从自己的地上赶走(trail of tears);二战时把日裔美国人关在集中营里。谁知道哪天会不会把所有的华裔也这么关起来。
评分明晚要在Rossabi的课上present一个有关联邦高法的opinion paper。先拿布雷耶挡一下~~
评分布雷耶大法官关于司法与民主关系的最新力作
评分布雷耶大法官关于司法与民主关系的最新力作
评分宪法书看多了一个样……
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有