The Supreme Court is one of the most extraordinary institutions in our system of government. Charged with the responsibility of interpreting the Constitution, the nine unelected justices of the Court have the awesome power to strike down laws enacted by our elected representatives. Why does the public accept the Court’s decisions as legitimate and follow them, even when those decisions are highly unpopular? What must the Court do to maintain the public’s faith? How can the Court help make our democracy work? These are the questions that Justice Stephen Breyer tackles in this groundbreaking book.
Today we assume that when the Court rules, the public will obey. But Breyer declares that we cannot take the public’s confidence in the Court for granted. He reminds us that at various moments in our history, the Court’s decisions were disobeyed or ignored. And through investigations of past cases, concerning the Cherokee Indians, slavery, and Brown v. Board of Education, he brilliantly captures the steps—and the missteps—the Court took on the road to establishing its legitimacy as the guardian of the Constitution.
Justice Breyer discusses what the Court must do going forward to maintain that public confidence and argues for interpreting the Constitution in a way that works in practice. He forcefully rejects competing approaches that look exclusively to the Constitution’s text or to the eighteenth-century views of the framers. Instead, he advocates a pragmatic approach that applies unchanging constitutional values to ever-changing circumstances—an approach that will best demonstrate to the public that the Constitution continues to serve us well. The Court, he believes, must also respect the roles that other actors—such as the president, Congress, administrative agencies, and the states—play in our democracy, and he emphasizes the Court’s obligation to build cooperative relationships with them.
Finally, Justice Breyer examines the Court’s recent decisions concerning the detainees held at Guantánamo Bay, contrasting these decisions with rulings concerning the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. He uses these cases to show how the Court can promote workable government by respecting the roles of other constitutional actors without compromising constitutional principles.
Making Our Democracy Work is a tour de force of history and philosophy, offering an original approach to interpreting the Constitution that judges, lawyers, and scholars will look to for many years to come. And it further establishes Justice Breyer as one of the Court’s greatest intellectuals and a leading legal voice of our time.
Stephen Gerald Breyer (pronounced /ˈbraɪər/; born August 15, 1938) is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994, and known for his pragmatic approach to constitutional law, Breyer is generally associated with the more liberal side of the Court.[1]
Following a clerkship with Supreme Court Associate Justice Arthur Goldberg in 1964, Breyer became well-known as a law professor and lecturer at Harvard Law School starting in 1967. There he specialized in the area of administrative law, writing a number of influential text books that remain in use today. He held other prominent positions before being nominated for the Supreme Court, including special assistant to the United States Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, and assistant special prosecutor on the Watergate Special Prosecution Force in 1973.
In his 2005 book Active Liberty, Breyer made his first attempt to systematically lay out his views on legal theory, arguing that the judiciary should seek to resolve issues to encourage popular participation in governmental decisions.
在没看这本书以前,我脑海中的美国最高法院在司法方面有着绝对的话语权,单纯的羡慕着他们的司法独立,殊不知和其他事物的发展一样,最高法院为了真正实现司法独立也摔过跤、走错过路,直至今天还是依然前行着。 作者对于通过案例来展示最高法院在美国权威的树立过程,以及...
评分法国贵族托克维尔在其传世之作《论美国的民主》中有句名言:“在美国,几乎所有政治问题迟早都要变成司法问题。”托克维尔如此结论,旨在强调美国的法学家精神无所不在,“大部分公务人员都是或者曾经是法学家”,法学家精神“扩展到整个社会,深入到最低阶层,使全体人民都沾...
评分法官能为改革做些什么?——书评《法官能为民主做什么》 很久以前读过最高人民法院何帆的译作《法官能为民主做什么》,系现任美国联邦最高法院大法官斯蒂芬•布雷耶(Stephen Breyer)撰写的一本书,通过回顾“马伯里诉麦迪逊案”、“切诺基印第安人案”、“黑奴公民身份案”...
评分图书馆借到这本介绍美国最高法院的书,背景知识储备有限,读起来并不简单但好在并没有想像的那么枯燥。第二章看了好多遍才基本弄清Marbury 与 Madison 的一纸任命书之争,觉得挺有意思与各位分享(理解得不到位的地方请圈中大佬们指正)。 19世纪初,Adams 总统卸任前任命Marbur...
评分在《法官能为民主做什么》一书开头不久,作者斯蒂芬·布雷耶大法官提到他所经历的一个细节:一位非洲大法官困惑而羡慕地问他,“为什么法院说什么,美国人都会照办?”这个貌似天真的问题问得实在深刻,问出了很多国家——尤其是法治不健全的第三世界国家——民众的...
明晚要在Rossabi的课上present一个有关联邦高法的opinion paper。先拿布雷耶挡一下~~
评分布雷耶大法官关于司法与民主关系的最新力作
评分布雷耶大法官关于司法与民主关系的最新力作
评分权威 老生长谈 主流思想
评分权威 老生长谈 主流思想
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有