In Teaching History for the Common Good, Barton and Levstik present a clear overview of competing ideas among educators, historians, politicians, and the public about the nature and purpose of teaching history, and they evaluate these debates in light of current research on students' historical thinking. In many cases, disagreements about what should be taught to the nation's children, and how it should be presented, reflect fundamental differences that will not easily be resolved. A central premise of this book, though, is that systematic theory and research can play an important role in such debates, by providing evidence of how students think, how their ideas interact with the information they encounter both in school and out, and how these ideas differ across contexts. Such evidence is needed as an alternative to the untested assumptions that plague so many discussions of history education. The authors review research on students' historical thinking and set it in the theoretical context of mediated action - an approach that calls attention to the concrete actions that people undertake, the human agents responsible for such actions, the cultural tools that aid and constrain them, their purposes, and their social contexts. They explain how this theory allows educators to address the breadth of practices, settings, purposes, and tools that influence students' developing understanding of the past, as well as how it provides an alternative to the academic discipline of history as a way of making decisions about teaching and learning the subject in schools. Beyond simply describing the factors that influence students' thinking, Barton and Levstik evaluate them and suggest which aspects should be embraced, tolerated, or rejected. They base these evaluations not on the disciplinary study of history, but on the purpose of social education - preparing students for participation in a pluralist democracy. Their ultimate concern is how history can help citizens engage in collaboration toward the common good. In Teaching History for the Common Good, Levstik and Barton: Discuss the contribution of theory and research, explain the theory of mediated action and how it guides their analysis, and describe research on children's (and adults') knowledge of and interest in history; Lay out a vision of pluralist, participatory democracy and its relationship to the humanistic study of history, as a basis for evaluating the perspectives on the past that influence students' learning; Explore four principal "stances" toward history (identification, analysis, moral response, and exhibition); review research on the extent to which children and adolescents understand and accept each of these; and examine how the stances might contribute to - or detract from - participation in a pluralist democracy; Address six of the principal "tools" of history (narrative structure; stories of individual achievement and motivation; national narratives; inquiry; empathy as perspective-taking; and empathy as caring); and Review research and conventional wisdom on teachers' knowledge and practice, and argue that for teachers to embrace investigative, multiperspectival approaches to history, they need more than knowledge of content and pedagogy; they need a guiding purpose that can only be fulfilled by these approaches, and preparation for participatory democracy provides such purpose. Teaching History for the Common Good is essential reading for history and social studies professionals, researchers, teacher educators, and students, as well as for policy-makers, parents, and members of the general public who are interested in history education or in students' thinking and learning about the subject.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我得说,这本书的论述结构非常精巧,它不是简单地堆砌教学理论,而是像一个精心搭建的迷宫,每走一步都能发现新的视角和挑战。作者似乎花了大量篇幅来处理“共识与冲突”在历史教学中的张力。比如,当我们在教授一个国家历史时,如何平衡官方认可的宏大叙事与那些被历史洪流冲刷掉的少数群体经验?书中提供了一些非常实用的策略,教导教师如何在尊重事实的基础上,引导学生处理这些难以调和的矛盾,而不是简单地选择回避或偏袒某一方。我特别喜欢其中关于“证据的伦理”的探讨,它迫使我思考,我们选择呈现哪些证据、以及如何组织这些证据,本身就是一种干预和诠释。这种对教学过程的深刻自我反思,让这本书的价值远远超出了单纯的“教学方法”范畴,它触及了知识生产和传播的核心伦理问题。对于那些渴望深化自己教学实践,并希望学生能真正理解历史复杂性和多义性的教育工作者来说,这本书无疑是一剂强心针,它让人感到,即使是最具争议性的历史主题,也可以在课堂上以负责任和富有启发性的方式进行探讨。
评分这本书的叙事节奏非常稳健,它没有试图在一本书中解决所有关于历史教学的难题,而是聚焦于几个核心的、具有普遍性的挑战,并提供了一种系统性的、可迁移的解决框架。我印象最深的是它对于“多元文化背景下的历史课堂管理”所给予的关注。作者承认,在一个日益多元化的社会中,教师面临的挑战不仅是如何教历史,更是如何在一个充满不同文化和身份认同的群体中建立起有效的、共享的学习空间。书中提出了一些关于“对话规范”建立的建议,这些建议非常注重倾听的艺术和建立相互尊重的讨论氛围。这些内容不是那种高高在上的理论指导,而是非常接地气,直指一线教师在日常教学中最头疼的问题。总而言之,这本书的价值在于,它既有宏大的哲学视野,探讨历史在公民社会中的定位,同时又不失精细的实操指导,确保了其理论能真正转化为学生学习的有效体验。它让人感到鼓舞,因为这表明历史教学可以是非常有力量、有影响力的一个领域。
评分这本关于历史教学的书,坦率地说,读起来就像在听一位充满激情的教育家在课堂上娓娓道来,那种将枯燥的历史事实转化为鲜活、关乎当下的对话的功力,实在令人钦佩。作者似乎非常重视的,是如何让学生跳出“记住日期和人名”的窠臼,转而思考历史事件对我们今天社会结构、政治伦理乃至日常行为的深层影响。我尤其欣赏其中探讨的“历史的公共责任”这一视角,它不像传统教科书那样只是平铺直叙地讲述过去,而是不断地抛出问题:我们今天所面临的困境,其根源在哪里?那些被遗忘或边缘化的声音,对我们理解当前的民族身份构建有何启发?书中的案例分析非常丰富,从某个地方社区的历史档案挖掘,到对国家叙事中关键转折点的批判性重审,都展示了一种拒绝简单化处理复杂历史进程的决心。阅读过程中,我不断地被引导去反思自己过去接受历史教育的方式,以及我们如何才能培养出真正具有历史意识、能够积极参与公共生活的新一代公民。这本书不仅仅是给历史老师看的指南,它更像是一份对所有关心社会未来的人发出的邀请函,邀请我们共同参与到这场意义深远的“历史对话”中。
评分从阅读体验上讲,这本书的语言风格非常老派而扎实,充满了学术的严谨性,但同时又保持着一种对初学者友好的可及性,这在教育学著作中并不常见。它没有过多使用那些晦涩难懂的教育术语,而是更倾向于通过具体的教学设计情境来阐述观点。我发现作者在讨论如何构建“有意义的学习经验”时,展现了极强的实践智慧。例如,书中详细描述了一个项目式学习(PBL)的完整流程,如何引导高中生去扮演“历史侦探”,通过分析一手资料来重构一个特定时期的社会生活图景。这种详尽的步骤分解,对于那些希望将理论付诸实践的教师来说,简直是宝藏。它不只是告诉你“应该做”,更具体地告诉你“如何做”,包括时间管理、资源分配以及如何评估那些难以量化的批判性思维成果。读完这部分,我立刻感觉手中多了一张可以立刻投入使用的蓝图,而不是一堆空洞的口号。
评分这本书的整体气质,是一种对“历史目的性”的坚定信念,它坚信历史学习不仅仅是为了学术上的精通,更是为了塑造更负责任的社会成员。它仿佛在对我们说:历史不是过去时,它是进行时,是我们理解并重塑未来社会形态的必要工具。作者在阐述“共同利益”这一核心概念时,并没有将其浪漫化,而是将其置于一个充满挑战的现实背景下——在一个信息碎片化、身份政治日益凸显的时代,如何找到共同的道德或公民基石?书中探讨的“历史同情心”与“历史批判性”的平衡艺术,尤其引人深思。同情心要求我们理解过去的行动者,即使他们的行为在今天看来是错误的;而批判性则要求我们不为过去的错误辩护。这种微妙的平衡,是真正成熟的历史教育所追求的境界。读完后,我感觉自己对“历史教育”的定义被极大地拓宽了,它不再是单纯的学科传授,而是一种深层次的公民养成训练。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有