Vincent Guillin uses the issue of sexual equality as a prism through which to examine important differences a " epistemological, methodological and theoretical a " between Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill. He succeeds in showing how their differing conceptions of science and human nature influence and affect their respective approaches to philosophy and to the analysis of female (in)equality in particular. Guillin shines a bright searchlight into long-neglected aspects of both mena (TM)s thinking a " for example, Milla (TM)s proposal to construct an a ethologya (TM), or science of character-formation, and Comtea (TM)s seemingly bizarre interest in phrenology a " and the ways in which these shaped their views of womena (TM)s intellectual and political capacities. Guillina (TM)s wide-ranging study examines both mena (TM)s major and minor works, their correspondence with one another, and the reasons for the final acrimonious break between two of the nineteenth centurya (TM)s most original and important thinkers.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
過於細碎
评分過於細碎
评分過於細碎
评分過於細碎
评分過於細碎
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有