Human beings are active agents who can think. To understand how thought serves action requires understanding how people conceive of the relation between cause and effect, between action and outcome. In cognitive terms, how do people construct and reason with the causal models we use to represent our world? A revolution is occurring in how statisticians, philosophers, and computer scientists answer this question. Those fields have ushered in new insights about causal models by thinking about how to represent causal structure mathematically, in a framework that uses graphs and probability theory to develop what are called causal Bayesian networks. The framework starts with the idea that the purpose of causal structure is to understand and predict the effects of intervention. How does intervening on one thing affect other things? This is not a question merely about probability (or logic), but about action. The framework offers a new understanding of mind: Thought is about the effects of intervention and cognition is thus intimately tied to actions that take place either in the actual physical world or in imagination, in counterfactual worlds. The book offers a conceptual introduction to the key mathematical ideas, presenting them in a non-technical way, focusing on the intuitions rather than the theorems. It tries to show why the ideas are important to understanding how people explain things and why thinking not only about the world as it is but the world as it could be is so central to human action. The book reviews the role of causality, causal models, and intervention in the basic human cognitive functions: decision making, reasoning, judgment, categorization, inductive inference, language, and learning. In short, the book offers a discussion about how people think, talk, learn, and explain things in causal terms, in terms of action and manipulation. "Sloman has written an accessible, popular-level book that will serve as a useful general introduction to the tricky and complex issues involved in understanding causality and its role in cognitive processing. For people who are unfamiliar with the issues and the research involved, this is a good starting point, although parts may require thoughtful rereadings. For people who are generally familiar with the issues but not the recent research or theoretical conceptions (e.g. , the use of counterfactuals), this book can serve as a useful guide to update one's knowledge. People who are actively working in this area will probably find this book a quick and enjoyable read."--Michael Palij, PsycCRITIQUES "The field of Bayesian causal models is becoming increasingly important for theory building in cognitive science. This book provides a lively and lucid introduction to the core concepts, and weaves them together with the latest research on causality and related topics from the cognitive sciences. Elegant and entertaining."--Nick Chater, Director of the Institute for Applied Cognitive Science and Professor of Psychology, University of Warwick "The scientific analysis of causal systems has become much more sophisticated with recent developments in computer science, statistics, and philosophy during the past decade. For the first time, we have available a comprehensive formal language in which to represent complex causal systems and which can be used to define normative solutions to causal inference and judgment problems. Steven Sloman's book makes these important developments easily accessible to the reader, as well as presenting many of his own exciting applications of these new ideas in behavioral studies of learning and judging causal relationships. This well-written book is full of profound insights and fascinating results. Anyone who wants to know what's going on at the cutting edge of cognitive science should read it." --Reid Hastie, Professor of Behavioral Science, University of Chicago "In the last 15 years, there has been a quiet revolution in how we model, understand, and learn about the causal structure of the world. Having started in philosophy and computer science, but now vital in psychology and statistics, the causal revolution has been slowed by the conspicuous absence of a truly readable book-length introduction. Fortunately, Steve Sloman has now written one. In a book that includes all the key ideas behind causal modeling but none of the tedious technical details, hundreds of worked examples ranging from marketing to arithmetic, and dozens of applications ranging from how we categorize the world to how we might be evolved to learn about its causal structure, Sloman has made a difficult subject exciting and simple." --Richard Scheines, Professor of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University "Steven Sloman's Causal Models is the first broadly accessible book to survey an important and growing field of cognitive research: how people understand the causal structure of their world, and the role of causal understanding in all aspects of thinking, perceiving, and acting. No difficult technical concepts are assumed. Important unifying themes are explained clearly and illustrated with numerous examples. It will provide an excellent entry into this field for students, researchers, or interested general readers." --Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Paul E. Newton Career Development Professor, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的封面设计极具吸引力,那种深邃的蓝与冷峻的白形成了鲜明的对比,让人联想到深奥的理论与清晰的逻辑。我原本是抱着学习一些前沿统计方法的初衷翻开它的,期待能找到一套系统阐述复杂系统建模与因果推断的框架。然而,实际阅读下来,我发现它更像是一部关于哲学思辨的合集,而非一本实用的工具书。书中花费了大量的篇幅去探讨“什么是真正的因果关系”,这种追根究底的哲学探讨固然深刻,但对于急需解决实际数据分析问题的我来说,显得有些高屋建瓴,缺乏落地的细节指导。比如,它详细阐述了反事实推理的本体论基础,从休谟的观点一直追溯到当代神经科学的局限性,但对于如何使用R或Python库来实现一个可信的倾向得分匹配模型,却轻描淡写,仿佛那只是技术层面的小儿科。我花了大量时间试图在那些晦涩的论证中寻找一个明确的“操作手册”,结果只找到了一堆关于“知识的边界”的精美论述。这让人不禁怀疑,作者的真正目的究竟是想教会我们如何做科学研究,还是仅仅想让我们沉醉于智力上的游戏?这本书更像是为哲学系研究生准备的,而不是为数据科学家量身定做的。它成功地让你思考了很久,但并没有成功地让你学会新的技能。
评分作者在书中对“解释性”与“预测性”之间的权衡进行了冗长的辩论,这本身是一个重要的议题。然而,作者的处理方式显得过于二元对立和非黑即白,完全忽视了在许多实际应用场景中,两者是可以相互促进、协同工作的。例如,在构建推荐系统时,我们不仅需要模型能够准确预测用户的偏好,也需要理解模型做出推荐的内在逻辑,以便进行公平性审计和用户干预。这本书似乎固执地站在“解释性至上”的立场,对任何偏向于黑箱模型的讨论都持有一种近乎排斥的态度,未能提供任何关于如何“打开黑箱”的有效技术路径。我期待的是一种融合了统计严谨性和计算可行性的新范式,而不是一场关于哲学立场的站队。它成功地让我对解释性的价值深信不疑,但却完全没有告诉我,在面对TB级别的数据集时,该如何用可操作的方式实现这种解释性。最终,这本书留给读者的,与其说是知识,不如说是一种深深的理论上的焦虑感,即我们似乎永远无法完全了解我们所创造的模型是如何运作的。
评分这本书的叙事风格充满了令人不安的断裂感,读起来就像是在一个巨大的迷宫里探险,每走一步都感觉自己离出口更远了一点。它的结构松散得惊人,章节之间的逻辑跳跃性极大,仿佛是不同作者在不同心境下完成的草稿被强行拼凑在了一起。前三分之一部分,作者似乎沉迷于对某些经典经济学模型的历史回顾,引经据典,引述了大量我从未听闻的早期学者观点,但这些回顾对于理解现代机器学习的局限性并没有实质性的帮助。然后,猛地一转,后面又开始深入探讨了图论在网络结构分析中的应用,但这种深入是片面的,仅仅停留在概念介绍层面,完全没有提供任何算法的证明或优化思路。更令人费解的是,书中充斥着大量未加解释的符号和自定义术语,似乎作者预设读者已经拥有了深厚的数理基础和跨学科背景。我不得不频繁地暂停阅读,去搜索这些术语的定义,这极大地破坏了阅读的连贯性和流畅性。读完一半,我感到的是一种知识上的疲惫,而不是充实感,它像一本被过度编辑的学术期刊特刊,缺乏统一的主线和明确的读者定位。
评分从排版和装帧来看,这本书无疑是制作精良的,纸张质量上乘,字体选择也十分典雅,散发着一种“严肃学术”的味道。然而,内容上的乏味程度,与它精美的外表形成了强烈的反差。我本以为它会提供一些关于“干预效果估计”的最新进展,例如结构方程模型在处理非线性数据时的优势,或者如何利用最新的贝叶斯网络进行更鲁棒的预测。但它的大部分篇幅似乎都在重复一些已经被教科书讲透了的基础概念,只是换了一种更为迂回和晦涩的表达方式。例如,关于混杂因素的讨论,它反复强调了“所有已知的共同原因都需要被控制”,但对于如何系统性地识别“所有”未知的或不可观测的混杂因素,却避而不谈。这种故作高深的写法,让人感觉作者是在刻意制造知识壁垒,而不是在普及知识。阅读过程中,我脑海里经常出现这样的想法:“这段话,我完全可以用更简洁、更直观的语言来描述。”这本书的阅读体验,就像是喝一杯用陈年老茶泡制的白开水,闻起来很香,但入口却寡淡无味,缺乏真正能让人精神一振的“干货”。
评分这本书的讨论范围极其狭窄,给人一种“只见树木,不见森林”的感觉。作者似乎只关注了某一特定学派在特定领域内的争论,而完全忽略了这一领域在更广阔的科学图景中的地位和与其他研究方法的交叉点。比如,在处理时间序列数据时,现代计量经济学和深度学习领域已经发展出了许多强大的工具来处理序列依赖性和非平稳性,这本书却几乎没有提及这些与时俱进的方法论,反而执着于一些几十年前的线性模型假设。这使得整本书读起来像是一份来自上个世纪末的文献综述,缺乏对当下研究热点的敏感度。如果我是一名刚入门的研究生,读完它可能会对这个领域产生一种扭曲的、过时的认知,认为只有那些陈旧的理论才是“真正”的学术。它未能成功地将理论与新兴的计算能力相结合,导致其提出的许多论证在实际应用中显得力不从心,无法应对真实世界数据的复杂性和规模。它更像是对历史文献的一种致敬,而非对未来方向的指引。
评分对归因模型在各个学科做了简要的介绍 入门还凑活 写得乱了点
评分对归因模型在各个学科做了简要的介绍 入门还凑活 写得乱了点
评分对归因模型在各个学科做了简要的介绍 入门还凑活 写得乱了点
评分对归因模型在各个学科做了简要的介绍 入门还凑活 写得乱了点
评分对归因模型在各个学科做了简要的介绍 入门还凑活 写得乱了点
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有