Traditionally, American government has created detailed, formal procedures to ensure that its agencies and employees are accountable for finances and fairness. Now in the interest of improved performance, we are asking our front-line workers to be more responsive, we are urging our middle managers to be innovative, and we are exhorting our public executives to be entrepreneurial. Yet what is the theory of democratic accountability that empowers public employees to exercise such discretion while still ensuring that we remain a government of laws? How can government be responsive to the needs of individual citizens and still remain accountable to the entire polity? In Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Robert D. Behn examines the ambiguities, contradictions, and inadequacies in our current systems of accountability for finances, fairness, and performance. Weaving wry observations with political theory, Behn suggests a new model of accountability --with "compacts of collective, mutual responsibility" --to address new paradigms for public management.
評分
評分
評分
評分
翻書黨#Behn的名作,語言很平實,把accountability的問題也講得很清楚,就是最後提齣要360°衡量accountability作為解決方案有點不靠譜。
评分翻書黨#Behn的名作,語言很平實,把accountability的問題也講得很清楚,就是最後提齣要360°衡量accountability作為解決方案有點不靠譜。
评分翻書黨#Behn的名作,語言很平實,把accountability的問題也講得很清楚,就是最後提齣要360°衡量accountability作為解決方案有點不靠譜。
评分翻書黨#Behn的名作,語言很平實,把accountability的問題也講得很清楚,就是最後提齣要360°衡量accountability作為解決方案有點不靠譜。
评分翻書黨#Behn的名作,語言很平實,把accountability的問題也講得很清楚,就是最後提齣要360°衡量accountability作為解決方案有點不靠譜。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有