"Simply stunning in its erudition and winning in its style. Probably better than anyone before him, Burton Mack has allowed the novel voice of this lost gospel to be heard with clarity at the same time as he fixes its position in Mediterranean antiquity. His case is that the Sayings Gospel Q represents a key piece in the puzzle of Christian origins is compelling; equally powerful is his account of what difference Q makes to the understanding of Christian origins." (John S. Kloppenborg, author of Q Parallels ) This is the first full account of the lost gospel of Jesus' original followers, revealing him to be a Jewish Socrates who was mythologized into the New Testament Christ. Compiled by his followers during his lifetime, the Book of Q (from Quelle, German for source ) became the prime foundation for the New Testament gospels. Once lost, it has been reconstructed through a century of scholarship. In presenting his own translation, Burton Mack explains how the text of Q was determined and explores the implications of the discovery that Jesus was transformed into the dying and rising messianic savior of Christianity by the New Testament gospels. Instead of telling a dramatic story about Jesus' life as the Christian gospels do, the Book of Q contained only his sayings. The first followers of Jesus focused not upon his life and destiny, but on the social experiment called for by his teachings. Their book collected his proverbs, aphorisms, and parables to offer instruction in living authentically in the midst of a most confusing time. In The Lost Gospel, Burton Mack: puts forth the first popular translation of Q as scholarly consensus has reconstructed it; shows that Jesus' life story as presented in the New Testament gospels was fictionalized for theological purposes; reveals Jesus to be a countercultural teacher and leader--subsequently mythologized into the Christ of the New Testament; depicts Jesus' followers not as Christians, but as disciples of a wise, anti-establishment teacher; they did not believe him to be the son of God, believe that he rose from the dead, or gather to worship in his name; concludes that Christianity is a mythologized religion (like Buddhism and other religions) rooted in a historical figure and teachings that in reality are quite remote from conventional beliefs. "Q challenges the habituated assumptions and patterns of privilege granted the narrative gospels of the New Testament. With Burton Mack's landmark scholarship as a guide, the entire landscape of early Christian history and literature will now have to be revised." (Ron Cameron, author of The Other Gospels )
The first book to give the full account of the lost gospel of Jesus' original followers, revealing him to be a Jewish Socrates who was mythologized into the New Testament Christ.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的书名实在是太引人遐想了,拿到手的时候,我立刻就被封面上那种古老而神秘的质感给吸引住了。说实话,我对宗教历史和失落的文本一直抱有浓厚的兴趣,所以当我在书店的角落里发现它时,几乎是毫不犹豫地就决定带它回家。我原本期待着能看到某种晦涩难懂的学术探讨,或者至少是某种引人入胜的考古发现叙事。然而,当我真正沉浸其中时,体验却远比我预期的要复杂得多。作者似乎在构建一个宏大的世界观,但这个过程却显得有些散漫。开篇的几章,我感觉自己像是在一片巨大的迷雾中摸索,作者试图用一种近乎诗意的语言来描述一些概念,这无疑增加了文本的文学性,但也牺牲了清晰度。我花费了大量时间去试图理清人物关系和时间线索,但总感觉总有一层纱幔遮挡着核心的真相。书中对于某个特定文明的社会结构描写得非常细致,那种田园牧歌式的描绘让人向往,但似乎又暗藏着某种不祥的预兆,这种对比感处理得相当巧妙,让人在阅读过程中始终保持着一种紧张的期待。不过,我也必须承认,某些章节的节奏把握得稍显拖沓,尤其是在描述一些仪式和哲思的段落时,我有时会忍不住需要停下来,做几次深呼吸,才能继续往下读。总而言之,它像是一杯需要慢慢品味的陈年老酒,初入口可能略显苦涩,但后劲十足,让人回味悠长。
评分说实话,这本书的叙事手法简直是挑战我的阅读习惯。它完全不是那种直来直去的冒险故事,倒更像是一部被精心打碎了再重组的马赛克拼图。我必须承认,在阅读过程中,我时不时会冒出“这到底想表达什么?”的念头。作者似乎对时间的概念采取了一种非常随性的态度,过去、现在和某种预言中的未来,在同一页纸上毫无界限地交织在一起。这种非线性叙事在某些段落营造出了迷离而梦幻的氛围,特别是在描写主角的内心挣扎和那些模糊不清的幻象时,效果拔群。比如,书中有一段关于“镜像之河”的描写,其意象之丰富、色彩之斑斓,几乎让我能听见水流声,感觉到那种冰凉的触感。但是,这种风格的代价就是,情节的推进显得异常缓慢。我花了近乎一半的篇幅,才勉强捕捉到故事的主线——寻找某种失落的知识或力量。而支撑起这条主线的,更多是角色的内心独白和象征性的符号,而不是具体的事件。这本书的对话也很有意思,它们很少直接回答问题,更多的是抛出新的谜团,这让人有一种永远在追逐的疲惫感,但同时又被这种永恒的追逐所吸引。对于那些偏爱明确逻辑和清晰脉络的读者来说,这本书可能会是场灾难,但对我而言,它更像是一场精心设计的智力迷宫。
评分我得说,这本书的语言功力令人惊叹,但这种功力有时候也成了理解内容的障碍。作者对拉丁语、希腊语以及一些早期教派特有术语的运用,达到了近乎炫技的程度。每当书中出现一个不认识的词汇时,我都会习惯性地拿起手机去查阅背景资料,这极大地减慢了我的阅读速度,但也无形中让我对那个时代和那个圈子的氛围有了更深层次的代入感。书中对信仰与怀疑之间微妙界限的探讨尤为深刻。它没有简单地褒贬任何一方,而是把人性的挣扎放在了一个宏大的宇宙背景下进行审视。我特别欣赏作者在描绘“圣徒”形象时的处理方式——他们既拥有近乎神性的智慧,同时又被最原始的欲望和恐惧所困扰。这种对人性多维度的挖掘,使得角色摆脱了脸谱化的倾向。遗憾的是,在某些涉及技术细节或者历史考证的部分,文本略显单薄,似乎为了保持某种神秘感而故意避开了深入的阐释,这让那些想深究其原理的读者感到一丝意犹未尽。总的来说,这本书更像是一部哲学散文与历史小说之间的模糊地带产物,它提出的问题比它提供的答案要多得多。
评分这本书给我最深的感受是,它在试图构建一种超越时间限制的“永恒性”。作者似乎并不在意读者是否能在一周内读完它,它更像是一部需要伴随人生成长才能不断有新体会的作品。我注意到书中反复出现的主题——记忆的可靠性与历史的建构性——在不同的章节里以不同的面貌出现。比如,角色们对同一事件的回忆往往是相互矛盾的,这迫使读者必须不断地自我校准,质疑自己所接受的信息。这种元叙事的处理手法,虽然在当代文学中并不少见,但在这本书的特定背景下(关于失落的福音),显得尤为贴切和有力。我可以想象,这本书在不同的文化背景下被阅读时,会产生完全不同的解读,因为它本身就缺乏一个固定的、权威的解释框架。我读到最后,并没有得到一个“真相大白”的结局,反而收获了更多、更深刻的问题。这对于一部试图探讨终极真理的作品来说,或许才是最高的褒奖。它成功地在读者的脑海中留下了一片肥沃的、可以供后思索的荒原。
评分阅读体验可以说是跌宕起伏,但不是因为情节的激烈,而是因为情绪的波动。这本书最吸引我的是它对“异端”和“正统”之间权力斗争的细致刻画。作者并非从我们通常理解的角度去美化被历史抹去的声音,而是将这种“失落”本身视为一种宝贵的财富和一种持续的威胁。书中构建的那个秘密社团体系,组织结构复杂得令人咋舌,等级森严,规矩繁复,但又充满了对禁忌知识的渴望。我感觉自己就像一个潜伏在阴影中的观察者,试图窥探那些被刻意隐藏的仪式和誓约。然而,这种对复杂性的追求,在处理主要反派角色时,似乎稍稍用力过猛了。这个“对手”的动机,从头到尾都笼罩在一层过于厚重的、几乎是形而上学的迷雾中,使得我对他的行动逻辑始终无法完全理解和共情。他更像是一种理念的化身,而非一个有血有肉的人。这种处理方式使得高潮部分的冲突感略有减弱,更像是两个不同哲学体系之间的理念碰撞,而不是真正意义上的生死搏斗。尽管如此,最后几章留下的那种“一切并未结束”的悬念感,还是成功地勾住了我,让我对作者后续的创作充满了期待。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有