What Intelligence Tests Miss

What Intelligence Tests Miss pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

Keith E. Stanovich is Emeritus Professor of Applied Psychology and Human Development at the University of Toronto and former Canada Research Chair of Applied Cognitive Science. He is the author of over 200 scientific articles and seven books. He received his BA degree in psychology from Ohio State University in 1973 and his PhD in psychology from the University of Michigan in 1977.

出版者:Yale University Press
作者:Keith E. Stanovich
出品人:
頁數:328
译者:
出版時間:2010-2-23
價格:GBP 15.00
裝幀:Paperback
isbn號碼:9780300164626
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 心理學 
  • 思維 
  • 認知科學 
  • 思考 
  • psychology 
  • 認知&神經&⼼理科學 
  • 陽誌平 
  • 英文原版 
  •  
想要找書就要到 小美書屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Critics of intelligence tests - writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman - have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption. Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with 'good thinking', skills such as judgement and decision-making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behaviour, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests.

具體描述

讀後感

評分

本书在《思考快与慢》的两个系统理论上增加了一个层面(书中引用了许多前者的实验结果,许多内容也差不多),自主心智、算法心智与反省心智。个人理解为就是直觉、智力和理性。该书用几乎一半的篇幅论证了现有智商概念的不科学,提出要将对理性的概念单独列出并单独测验,这部...  

評分

作者把心智分为三种,没有必要,也是不恰当的。传统分法都是两种,一种自动反应,一种费心思考;前者要么被称为直觉反应,要么被称为感受反应,要么被称为感情反应,要么被称为system 1;后者要么被称为理性反应,要么被称为理智反应,要么称为system 2。 作者所谓反省心智...

評分

整个疫情期间,美国总统特朗普的言论总是那么“雷人”。一会儿充满自信“没有人比我更了解新冠病毒”,一会儿又发言污蔑为“中国病毒”,几天后再改口。美国媒体四年来一天至少25小时在喷他如何如何德不配位。 中国网民干脆给他起个“川建国同志”的外号,一句“你是打入敌军内...  

評分

七月流火,恰逢我在生活中做了几个拖沓而失败的决定,于是读这本书极为应景。 阅读之前,我的问题很简单: > 智商高就能理性决策吗?我们该怎么理性决策? 其实这本书的副标题已经回答了前半个问题:聪明人也会做傻事。但我不只是想得到「能」或「不能」的回答,我想知道,...  

評分

七月流火,恰逢我在生活中做了几个拖沓而失败的决定,于是读这本书极为应景。 阅读之前,我的问题很简单: > 智商高就能理性决策吗?我们该怎么理性决策? 其实这本书的副标题已经回答了前半个问题:聪明人也会做傻事。但我不只是想得到「能」或「不能」的回答,我想知道,...  

用戶評價

评分

選擇性看看

评分

後半部分實在是太難啃瞭。。說瞭很多dysrationalia的內容

评分

全書講的一點:理性比智商更重要。前麵一大部分講智商測驗如何如何不對感覺略學術瞭。後麵講理性的重要性,以及因為各種不理性導緻的問題還是挺好的,有希望能看到總結性的內容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或許,理解與接受這一點,並在很多解決辦法的設計上考慮到人的非理性,相比要求人們更理性會更好。

评分

看看

评分

全書講的一點:理性比智商更重要。前麵一大部分講智商測驗如何如何不對感覺略學術瞭。後麵講理性的重要性,以及因為各種不理性導緻的問題還是挺好的,有希望能看到總結性的內容。可惜,理性再重要,人就是非理性的。或許,理解與接受這一點,並在很多解決辦法的設計上考慮到人的非理性,相比要求人們更理性會更好。

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有