Now nearing its 60th printing in English and translated into nineteen languages, Michael E. Porter's Competitive Strategy has transform ed the theory, practice, and teaching of business strategy throughout the world. Electrifying in its simplicity -- like all great breakthroughs -- Porter's analysis of industries captures the complexity of industry competition in five underlying forces. Porter introduces one of the most powerful competitive tools yet developed: his three generic strategies -- lowest cost, differentiation, and focus -- which bring structure to the task of strategic positioning. He shows how competitive advantage can be defined in terms of relative cost and relative prices, thus linking it directly to profitability, and presents a whole new perspective on how profit is created and divided. In the almost two decades since publication, Porter's framework for predicting competitor behavior has transformed the way in which companies look at their rivals and has given rise to the new discipline of competitor assessment.
More than a million managers in both large and small companies, investment analysts, consultants, students, and scholars throughout the world have internalized Porter's ideas and applied them to assess industries, understand competitors,, and choose competitive positions. The ideas in the book address the underlying fundamentals of competition in a way that is independent of the specifics of the ways companies go about competing.
Competitive Strategy has filled a void in management thinking. It provides an enduring foundation and grounding point on which all subsequent work can be built. By bringing a disciplined structure to the question of how firms achieve superior profitability, Porter's rich frameworks and deep insights comprise a sophisticated view of competition unsurpassed in the last quarter-century.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
---------------------------------
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.:
Chapter 1: The Structural Analysis of Industries
The essence of formulating competitive strategy is relating a company to its environment. Although the relevant environment is very broad, encompassing social as well as economic forces, the key aspect of the firm's environment is the industry or industries in which it competes. Industry structure has a strong influence in determining the competitive rules of the game as well as the strategies potentially available to the firm. Forces outside the industry are significant primarily in a relative sense; since outside forces usually affect all firms in the industry, the key is found in the differing abilities of firms to deal with them.
The intensity of competition in an industry is neither a matter of coincidence nor bad luck. Rather, competition in an industry is rooted in its underlying economic structure and goes well beyond the behavior of current competitors. The state of competition in an industry depends on five basic competitive forces. The collective strength of these forces determines the ultimate profit potential in the industry, where profit potential is measured in terms of long run return on invested capital. Not all industries have the same potential. They differ fundamentally in their ultimate profit potential as the collective strength of the forces differs; the forces range from intense in industries like tires, paper, and steel -- where no firm earns spectacular returns -- to relatively mild in industries like oil-field equipment and services, cosmetics, and toiletries -- where high returns are quite common.
This chapter will be concerned with identifying the key structural features of industries that determine the strength of the competitive forces and hence industry profitability. The goal of competitive strategy for a business unit in an industry is to find a position in the industry where the company can best defend itself against these competitive forces or can influence them in its favor. Since the collective strength of the forces may well be painfully apparent to all competitors, the key for developing strategy is to delve below the surface and analyze the sources of each. Knowledge of these underlying sources of competitive pressure highlights the critical strengths and weaknesses of the company, animates its positioning in its industry, clarifies the areas where strategic changes may yield the greatest payoff, and highlights the areas where industry trends promise to hold the greatest significance as either opportunities or threats. Understanding these sources will also prove to be useful in considering areas for diversification, though the primary focus here is on strategy in individual industries. Structural analysis is the fundamental underpinning for formulating competitive strategy and a key building block for most of the concepts in this book.
To avoid needless repetition, the term "product" rather than "product or service" will be used to refer to the output of an industry, even though the principles of structural analysis developed here apply equally to product and service businesses. Structural analysis also applies to diagnosing industry competition in any country or in an international market, though some of the institutional circumstances may differ.
Structural Determinants of the Intensity of Competition
Let us adopt the working definition of an industry as the group of firms producing products that are close substitutes for each other. In practice there is often a great deal of controversy over the appropriate definition, centering around how close substitutability needs to be in terms of product, process, or geographic market boundaries. Because we will be in a better position to treat these issues once the basic concept of structural analysis has been introduced, we will assume initially that industry boundaries have already been drawn.
Competition in an industry continually works to drive down the rate of return on invested capital toward the competitive floor rate of return, or the return that would be earned by the economist's "perfectly competitive" industry. This competitive floor, or "free market" return, is approximated by the yield on long-term government securities adjusted upward by the risk of capital loss. Investors will not tolerate returns below this rate in the long run because of their alternative of investing in other industries, and firms habitually earning less than this return will eventually go out of business. The presence of rates of return higher than the adjusted free market return serves to stimulate the inflow of capital into an industry either through new entry or through additional investment by existing competitors. The strength of the competitive forces in an industry determines the degree to which this inflow of investment occurs and drives the return to the free market level, and thus the ability of firms to sustain above-average returns.
The five competitive forces -- entry, threat of substitution, bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, and rivalry among current competitors -- reflect the fact that competition in an industry goes well beyond the established players. Customers, suppliers, substitutes, and potential entrants are all "competitors" to firms in the industry and may be more or less prominent depending on the particular circumstances. Competition in this broader sense might be termed extended rivalry.
All five competitive forces jointly determine the intensity of industry competition and profitability, and the strongest force or forces are governing and become crucial from the point of view of strategy formulation. For example, even a company with a very strong market position in an industry where potential entrants are no threat will earn low returns if it faces a superior, lower-cost substitute. Even with no substitutes and blocked entry, intense rivalry among existing competitors will limit potential returns. The extreme case of competitive intensity is the economist's perfectly competitive industry, where entry is free, existing firms have no bargaining
Michael E. Porter, one of the world's leading authorities on competitive strategy and international competitiveness, is the C. Roland Christensen Professor of Business Administration at the Harvard Business School. In 1983, Professor Porter was appointed to President Reagan's Commission on Industrial Competitiveness, the initiative that triggered the competitiveness debate in America. He serves as an advisor to heads of state, governors, mayors, and CEOs throughout the world. The recipient of the Wells Prize in Economics, the Adam Smith Award, three McKinsey Awards, and honorary doctorates from the Stockholm School of Economics and six other universities, Porter is the author of fourteen books, among them Competitive Strategy, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, and Cases in Competitive Strategy, all published by The Free Press. He lives in Brookline, Massachusetts.
评分
评分
评分
评分
令我印象深刻的是,尽管这本书出版已有一段时间,其核心洞察力在今天看来依然具有惊人的穿透力。在当前这个技术迭代速度快到令人眼花缭乱的时代,很多过时的理论都会被束之高阁,但这本书中关于差异化和取舍的讨论,却仿佛穿越了时间。它并没有被具体的、稍纵即逝的技术浪潮所裹挟,而是直指商业竞争的本质——即如何在有限的资源下做出不可逆转的、独特的选择。这种对“不变”的把握,使得书中的论述摆脱了时效性的限制,成为了真正的经典。每次重读,我总能从不同的职业阶段或市场背景下,挖掘出新的共鸣点。这种经得起时间考验的理论深度,保证了它不仅仅是一时的热门畅销书,而是一本可以伴随职业生涯持续成长的战略指南,其价值会随着读者的阅历增长而愈发凸显。
评分这本书的叙事逻辑严密得像一个精密的瑞士钟表,每一个论点都像是被精心打磨过的齿轮,咬合得天衣无缝,驱动着整个理论体系向前推进。作者似乎有一种魔力,能将那些原本需要多页复杂图表和冗长解释才能阐明的商业战略,用一种近乎诗意的简洁性表达出来。我发现自己很少需要回溯前面的章节去重新梳理脉络,因为作者在引入新概念时,总是能巧妙地与之前建立的框架相连接,形成一种强烈的知识的连续性和有机性。特别是当他开始分析不同行业案例时,那种从宏观理论到微观实践的过渡是如此的自然流畅,让人感觉不是在阅读枯燥的教条,而是在跟随一位经验极其丰富的导师,进行一场高强度的思维漫步。读完一个主要章节后,我常常会停下来,不是因为我理解不了,而是因为被那种逻辑的优雅所震撼,需要时间去回味那种“原来如此”的顿悟感。这种结构上的精妙,极大地提升了学习效率,避免了我们在阅读厚重著作时容易产生的思维疲劳和路径迷失。
评分这本书的实用性是毋庸置疑的,但它高明之处在于,它并没有止步于提供一套可以照搬的“食谱”,而是致力于塑造一种战略性的思维模式。许多商业书籍会告诉你“怎么做”,而这本书更侧重于教你“如何思考”。例如,在分析企业定位时,它不是简单地罗列成功企业的特征,而是深入探讨了为什么某些定位能够持续产生超额回报,而另一些看似完美的定位却最终走向平庸。书中提供的分析框架,比如对行业结构力量的解构,已经成为了我日常工作中分析新项目和评估现有战略的“默认设置”。我发现,即便是面对一个全新的、完全陌生的市场,我也可以迅速套用书中提供的分析工具箱,进行一次有条理、有深度的扫描。这种思维框架的迁移能力,远比书本中任何一个具体的案例分析要珍贵得多,因为它赋予了读者一种持续迭代和适应复杂环境的内在能力。
评分坦白说,这本书的深度初读时确实带来了一定的挑战,但这种挑战性恰恰是它价值所在。它绝不是那种可以抱着咖啡在沙滩上翻阅的“轻松读物”,更像是一套需要全神贯注、甚至需要准备笔记本和荧光笔才能“攻克”的堡垒。书中的概念体系庞大且相互关联,特别是关于动态竞争和价值链分析的部分,首次阅读时需要放慢速度,反复咀嚼那些定义。我记得有一次,为了完全理解作者对于“战略一致性”的界定,我甚至将那一段落抄写了三遍,才真正将其内化为自己的思考工具。然而,正是这种初期的“抗拒”,换来了后续理解的巨大飞跃。一旦跨过那道知识的门槛,你会发现自己看待商业问题的视角发生了根本性的改变——原本模糊不清的产业边界突然清晰起来,那些看似随机的市场波动也开始有了可预测的模式。这种知识的“复利效应”是这本书最令人着迷的地方,它投资了你的专注力,并以深刻的洞察力作为回报。
评分这本书的装帧设计简直是一场视觉的盛宴,我得说,封面那深沉的靛蓝色调,配上烫金的字体,就让人忍不住想把它捧在手里细细摩挲。拿到手的触感非常扎实,纸张的质地不是那种廉价的、一摸就软塌塌的类型,而是带有微微的纹理感,即便是长时间阅读也不会觉得指尖干燥。内页的排版也体现了出版方极大的用心,字号和行距的拿捏恰到好处,即便是在昏暗的灯光下,阅读起来也不会感到吃力,这对于我这种习惯深夜“偷读”的读者来说,简直是福音。我尤其欣赏它在章节过渡页的处理上,那些简洁而有力的留白,总能在信息密集的章节间提供一个短暂的喘息空间,让大脑能够消化刚才吸收的复杂概念,然后再以饱满的精神迎接下一轮的知识冲击。装订工艺的考究也保证了即便是翻阅了无数次,书脊依然保持着完美的弧度,没有出现任何松动的迹象,这对于一本注定要被反复查阅和标记的理论书籍来说,是至关重要的耐用性体现。总的来说,从打开快递箱的那一刻起,我就知道这不仅仅是一套书,更像是一件精心制作的工艺品,它的物理形态就已经为接下来的深度学习奠定了高雅而严肃的基调。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有