'"Not since "Edward Said's Beginnings" has as much pressure been applied on the vexed concept of origin as in this remarkable book. John Pizer succeeds in rescuing it from the unearned abuse to which it has been subjected by much post-structuralist criticism, and in so doing provides illuminating readings of five of this century's most influential thinkers' - Martin Jay, author of "Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukacs to Habermas"."Toward a Theory of Radical Origin" represents a significant reconsideration of one of the main prejudices of contemporary literary theory: that discourses of 'origin' remain irretrievably foundationalist or logocentric. Via a lucid reassessment of the intellectual legacy of five German thinkers, Pizer compels us to view the concept of origin in new and illuminating ways' - Richard Wolin, author of "The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism, Poststructuralism". This provocative book addresses one of the central and most controversial branches of Western thought: the philosophy of origin.In light of recent poststructuralist principles such as alterity, differance, and dissemination, the philosophy of origin seems to exemplify the repressive, reactionary tendencies of much of the Western philosophical tradition. John Pizer aims to overturn this recent antipathy to the philosophy of origin. He ably summarizes poststructuralist critiques of that earlier philosophical tradition, then turns to five German thinkers (Nietzsche, Benjamin, Rosenzweig, Heidegger, and Adorno) who developed philosophies of origin that effectively anticipate and counter poststructuralist attacks.These are thinkers who, in one way or another, influenced recent generations of poststructuralist thinkers. Pizer argues, however, that rather than do away with the notion of origin altogether (as in the works of the most thoroughgoing poststructuralists), these philosophers developed theories in which origin is always 'multiple and plurivalent'. In the writings of these seminal German thinkers, 'origin' becomes 'origins', and 'authentic origins' are 'inherently plural and divergent'. A valuable, engrossing account of a wide range of thinkers and their complex relations, Pizer's book recovers the notion of origin for an intellectual world that has come to value multiplicity, openness, and diversity. John Pizer is an associate professor of German and comparative literature at Louisiana State University. He is the author of "The Historical Perspective in German Genre Theory: Its Development from Gottsched to Hegel".
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的叙事节奏有一种奇特的催眠效果,它不是那种快节奏的、情节跌宕起伏的小说,而是更像是在构建一个巨大的、精密的钟表机制。每一个章节的推进,都像是齿轮缓缓咬合,发出沉闷而有力的声响。我被其内部的严密性所折服,即便是最看似跳脱的论述,最终也能被巧妙地收束到那个“激进起源”的主题之下。它没有给出廉价的答案,相反,它提供的更多的是一套观察世界的全新“工具箱”。我个人特别欣赏作者在处理“主体性”问题时的那种决绝态度,那种毫不留情的解构,让人感到一种近乎冷酷的纯粹。读完后,我发现自己看世界的眼睛都变了,以前那些看似铁板钉钉的社会结构、文化惯例,此刻都像是一层薄薄的冰面,随时可能在新的理论压力下碎裂。这本书的价值,不在于它告诉我们“是什么”,而在于它彻底教会了我们如何去“质疑为什么”。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的,是它在探讨“起源”时所展现出的那种近乎形而上学的野心。它没有满足于描述历史的演变,而是试图去触碰那个“前历史”的断裂点,那个一切开始发生之前的“零度状态”。这种探索充满了风险,因为它很容易滑向纯粹的臆测,但作者却凭借其扎实的逻辑铺陈,将这种形而上的追问,建立在坚实的论据之上。我注意到书中对时间性与非时间性概念的辩证处理,非常巧妙地避开了传统形而上学中常见的循环论证。读完此书,你会开始重新审视“开始”这个概念本身的意义——它究竟是一个时间点,还是一种持续不断的、未完成的张力?这本书像是给哲学和理论研究领域投下了一枚深水炸弹,其产生的涟漪效应,我相信会在未来很长一段时间内持续显现。它不仅仅是一本理论著作,更像是一份关于思维革命的宣言。
评分坦白地说,我从未读过如此具有侵略性的理论作品。这里的“侵略性”是指它对既有知识的强大渗透力和改造力。作者的笔锋犀利无比,他似乎毫不留情地撕开了那些看似光鲜亮丽的理论外衣,直指其内部腐朽的结构。我感觉自己不是在阅读一本书,而是在参与一场思想上的“攻城战”。每一次阅读,都像是在试图攻克一座戒备森严的堡垒,每攻下一层,都能看到更宏大、更具颠覆性的风景。这种体验是极其振奋人心的,但同时也伴随着一种深刻的孤独感,因为你知道,一旦你真正理解了作者所揭示的某些底层逻辑,你可能就再也无法回到那个“无知是福”的舒适区了。这本书要求读者具备高度的批判精神和对晦涩概念的接受能力,它绝不是茶余饭后的消遣读物,更像是一项长期的智力修行,值得反复咀嚼,细细品味其中的每一道棱角。
评分初读之下,我感到了一种强烈的智力上的“不适感”,但这并非贬义,恰恰说明作者的论证逻辑已经成功地跳脱了常规的轨道。书中对一些经典哲学命题的处理方式,简直像是一位经验丰富的天文学家,突然指出我们所依赖的星图是基于错误的坐标系绘制的。文字的密度非常高,需要反复咀咏才能领会其间的精妙转折。我注意到,作者在构建其理论框架时,似乎大量借鉴了那些跨学科的晦涩领域,这使得整个叙事充满了张力和未知的探索感。它不像一本传统的教科书,更像是一份秘密的藏宝图,需要读者自己去挖掘和连接那些看似不相关的碎片。这种阅读体验是极其耗费心神的,但也因此带来了巨大的精神上的满足——仿佛终于触碰到了某个“秘密的开关”,让整个世界的运作逻辑在瞬间清晰又复杂起来。我不得不承认,这本书对读者的基础知识储备提出了相当高的要求,但对于那些愿意投入精力的读者来说,回报是巨大的。
评分这本书的书名真是引人注目,它仿佛在邀请读者踏入一片思想的荒原,去探寻那些最根本、最激进的起源。我拿到这本书的时候,就被封面那种略带粗粝感的质感和略显晦涩的标题吸引了。它给我的第一印象,不是那种温文尔雅的学术探讨,而更像是一次对既有知识体系的“外科手术式”解剖。我期待它能提供一种全新的视角,去审视我们习以为常的那些概念是如何被构建起来的,又是如何在其根基处蕴藏着颠覆性的可能性。我尤其好奇,作者是如何界定“激进起源”的内涵的,它是否仅仅是一种历史性的回溯,还是一种面向未来的理论建构?在阅读过程中,我不断地在思考,这种“激进性”的代价是什么?它是否会牺牲掉某些我们赖以生存的确定性和安宁?这本书无疑是给那些厌倦了表面功夫、渴望直击本质的思考者准备的一剂强心针,它迫使你放下已有的预设,准备迎接思想上的冲击。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有