As today's new technologies challenge the reign of writing, Clifford Siskin puts our current concerns about such change into history. In the 18th and early 19th centuries in Britain, he argues, the "new" technology was writing itself. How did its proliferation-in print and through silent reading-coalesce into the dominant forms of literary modernity, and with what consequences? What changed, strikingly and fundamentally, were ways of knowing and of working. Admonitions against young women reading novels were not merely matters of Augustan conservatism but signals of those shifts: they warned against the capacity of the technology to change those who used it. Despite such caution, Britain saw, between 1700 and 1830, the advent of both modern disciplinarity and modern professionalism. These new divisions of knowledge and of labor were the work of writing, as was the engendering, at their intersection, of the discipline that took writing itself as its professional work-Literature.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
說siskin是新曆史主義是不正確的。他是馬剋思的，同時又是往前的，懷念跟他修課的日子，雖然他也許早忘瞭我。
评分說siskin是新曆史主義是不正確的。他是馬剋思的，同時又是往前的，懷念跟他修課的日子，雖然他也許早忘瞭我。
评分說siskin是新曆史主義是不正確的。他是馬剋思的，同時又是往前的，懷念跟他修課的日子，雖然他也許早忘瞭我。
评分說siskin是新曆史主義是不正確的。他是馬剋思的，同時又是往前的，懷念跟他修課的日子，雖然他也許早忘瞭我。
评分說siskin是新曆史主義是不正確的。他是馬剋思的，同時又是往前的，懷念跟他修課的日子，雖然他也許早忘瞭我。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有