This provocative book offers a fascinating account of one of the newest and most exciting fields in the human sciences: neuroarthistory. In recent decades there has been a dramatic increase in both the quantity and the quality of our knowledge about the brain, especially the visual brain. The number of art historians making use of the new neuroscience is growing and the insights they gain by doing so are compelling. Knowledge of phenomena such as neural plasticity and neural mirroring is making it possible to answer with a new level of precision some of the most challenging questions about both the creative process and the response to art. This is equally true whether their framing is positivist or postmodernist. John Onians devotes each of his twenty-five chapters to a specific writer, or 'neural subject', each of whom recognised that the mind was a part of human nature. As the neural basis of the mind became more and more apparent, they became clearer about how an understanding of that neural basis could contribute to an understanding of all human behaviours, including art. The level of agreement among major thinkers such as Montesquieu, Burke, Kant, Marx and Freud, and leading art historians such as Pliny, Winckelmann, Ruskin, Pater, Taine, Wolfflin, Riegl, Gombrich and Baxandall, not to mention artists such as Alberti and Leonardo and scientists such as Aristotle at the beginning and Zeki at the end of the twenty-five centuries covered in the book, is startling. So, too, is the extent to which their penetrating observations match the findings of modern neuroscience. Anyone wondering whether to making use of neuroscience themselves should read this book. It will change most readers' view not only of the history of art history, but of the history of art itself - and even of the history of culture.
评分
评分
评分
评分
从亚里士多德到孟德斯鸠都是平铺直叙,到温克尔曼和康德有个小高峰,接着是维舍尔到沃尔夫林的二次高峰,最后从贡布里希开始就进入了激战,尽管作者作为贡布里希学生的身份,多少粉饰了这场争论的“血腥程度”
评分听过几次onians的讲座,他给我们上课的时候倒没有怎么提到这些想法,讲的都比较浅显的艺术史。这本书是修读西方现代文学时外教老师的一节内容,onians的理论在我看来有点类似于经验主义,但他将此处的经验变成了“neuro”...
评分re-write history of art
评分从亚里士多德到孟德斯鸠都是平铺直叙,到温克尔曼和康德有个小高峰,接着是维舍尔到沃尔夫林的二次高峰,最后从贡布里希开始就进入了激战,尽管作者作为贡布里希学生的身份,多少粉饰了这场争论的“血腥程度”
评分从亚里士多德到孟德斯鸠都是平铺直叙,到温克尔曼和康德有个小高峰,接着是维舍尔到沃尔夫林的二次高峰,最后从贡布里希开始就进入了激战,尽管作者作为贡布里希学生的身份,多少粉饰了这场争论的“血腥程度”
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有