Exploring Law's Empire is a collection of essays examining the work of Ronald Dworkin in the philosophy of law and constitutionalism. A group of leading legal theorists develop, defend and critique the major areas of Dworkin's work, including his criticism of legal positivism, his theory of law as integrity, and his work on constitutional theory. The volume concludes with a lengthy response to the essays by Dworkin himself, which develops and clarifies many of his positions on the central questions of legal and constitutional theory. The volume represents an ideal companion for students and scholars embarking on a study of Dworkin's work.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应，分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力，德翁回应显示，曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单，难得德翁一片赞同。
评分沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应，分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力，德翁回应显示，曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单，难得德翁一片赞同。
评分沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应，分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力，德翁回应显示，曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单，难得德翁一片赞同。
评分沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应，分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力，德翁回应显示，曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单，难得德翁一片赞同。
评分沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应，分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力，德翁回应显示，曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单，难得德翁一片赞同。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有