Exploring Law's Empire

Exploring Law's Empire pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:Oxford University Press
作者:Hershovitz, Scott 编
出品人:
页数:352
译者:
出版时间:2009-4-25
价格:USD 39.95
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780199546145
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • Dworkin研究
  • 法学
  • 法哲学
  • 法律哲学
  • 法理学
  • 法律理论
  • 罗纳德·德沃金
  • 解释学
  • 法官裁量权
  • 法律实践
  • 宪法解释
  • 正义
  • 法律与道德
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Exploring Law's Empire is a collection of essays examining the work of Ronald Dworkin in the philosophy of law and constitutionalism. A group of leading legal theorists develop, defend and critique the major areas of Dworkin's work, including his criticism of legal positivism, his theory of law as integrity, and his work on constitutional theory. The volume concludes with a lengthy response to the essays by Dworkin himself, which develops and clarifies many of his positions on the central questions of legal and constitutional theory. The volume represents an ideal companion for students and scholars embarking on a study of Dworkin's work.

作者简介

目录信息

Stephen Breyer: Introduction: The International Constitutional Judge
1: Christopher L. Eisgruber: Should Constitutional Judges Be Philosophers?
2: James E. Fleming: The Place of History and Philosophy in the Moral Reading of the American Constitution
3: Rebecca L. Brown: How Constitutional Theory Found its Soul: The Contributions of Ronald Dworkin
4: S. L. Hurley: Coherence, Hypothetical Cases, and Precedent
5: Scott Hershovitz: Integrity and Stare Decisis
6: Dale Smith: The Many Faces of Political Integrity
7: Jeremy Waldron: Did Dworkin Ever Answer the Crits?
8: Stephen Perry: Associative Obligations and the Obligation to Obey the Law
9: John Gardner: Law's Aims in Law's Empire
10: Mark Greenberg: How Facts Make Law
11: Mark Greenberg: Hartian Positivism and Normative Facts: How Facts Make Law II
Ronald Dworkin: Response
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应,分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力,德翁回应显示,曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单,难得德翁一片赞同。

评分

沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应,分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力,德翁回应显示,曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单,难得德翁一片赞同。

评分

沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应,分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力,德翁回应显示,曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单,难得德翁一片赞同。

评分

沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应,分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力,德翁回应显示,曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单,难得德翁一片赞同。

评分

沃尔德论讨论德沃金对批判法学的回应,分析了建构性诠释与整全性之间的张力,德翁回应显示,曾经的爱徒显然没理解业师的想法。格林伯格讨论事实是否觉决定法律内容两篇文章细碎纠缠观点简单,难得德翁一片赞同。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有