This issue of Thomistic Papers can be divided into two parts.The fast is made up of pieces which connect more or less directlywith the philosophical work of Etienne Gilson. In the first ofthese pieces John Knasas rejects the widely held view that Gilsontheologized metaphysics. Any religious believer who does philosophyin a wholehearted way will surely find that his religious convictionsinfluence his philosophical choices and directions at key points.But when does this influence transform what he or she is doingfrom metaphysics into theology? Knasas does not shrink fromthe subtlety required to answer this question; he insists that inthe end both Gilson and Thomas argue metaphysics philosophicallyrather than theologically, although they gratefully accept hintsfrom revelation as to where these arguments might be found where they might lead. The hints may be theological, butthe foundation and execution of argument are philosophical.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有