This issue of Thomistic Papers can be divided into two parts.The fast is made up of pieces which connect more or less directlywith the philosophical work of Etienne Gilson. In the first ofthese pieces John Knasas rejects the widely held view that Gilsontheologized metaphysics. Any religious believer who does philosophyin a wholehearted way will surely find that his religious convictionsinfluence his philosophical choices and directions at key points.But when does this influence transform what he or she is doingfrom metaphysics into theology? Knasas does not shrink fromthe subtlety required to answer this question; he insists that inthe end both Gilson and Thomas argue metaphysics philosophicallyrather than theologically, although they gratefully accept hintsfrom revelation as to where these arguments might be found where they might lead. The hints may be theological, butthe foundation and execution of argument are philosophical.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有