Christine Mollier reveals in this volume previously unexplored dimensions of the interaction between Buddhism and Taoism in medieval China. While scholars of Chinese religions have long recognized the mutual influences linking the two traditions, Mollier here brings to light their intense contest for hegemony in the domains of scripture and ritual. Drawing on a far-reaching investigation of canonical texts, together with manuscript sources from Dunhuang and the monastic libraries of Japan - many of them studied here for the first time - she demonstrates the competition and complementarity of the two great Chinese religions in their quest to address personal and collective fears of diverse ills, including sorcery, famine, and untimely death.
目錄：
Chapter 1 The Heavanly Kitchens
Chapter 2 In Pursuit of the Socerers
Chapter 3 Augmenting the Life Account
Chapter 4 Under Stellar Protection
Chapter 5 Guanyin in a Daoist Guise
具體描述
讀後感
Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
評分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
評分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
評分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
評分Through exhaustive comparison between Zhengtong daozang (DZ) and various Buddhist scriptures collected in Buddhist canons (discovered from Dunhuang caves and different libraries), Mollier shows us readers a picture of Buddho-Daoist mutual appropriation, bot...
用戶評價
說是研究Buddho-Taoist exchange，感覺更像是研究佛教如何“抄襲”道教（唯一的例外是最後一章）。實則，敦煌材料至少在時間上早於明代的道藏。是否能斷定佛教一定是抄襲的我們現在所能見到的那種“道教”呢？這或許是要打大問號的。3.5分
评分隻是找瞭幾個敦煌文獻比較閱讀瞭一下，比較像是讀書筆記
评分精彩，有關佛道關係新的物質研究角度。作者好法國。
评分精彩，有關佛道關係新的物質研究角度。作者好法國。
评分題材有趣，不管佛道把自己的思想標得多超脫，作為宗教都是不得不迴應與解決俗世睏擾的，如何吃，行，延年益算，驅鬼除噩夢。作者的推斷是，往往一個宗教率先討論瞭某個俗世睏擾，同期的另一個教就迫切地要想齣對應的對策，而由於時間迫切，或是沒有更好的材料組織，這個對策很有可能是粗暴的奪取另一邊的想法和模闆。至於哪一個傳統被接納，推崇，存活得更久，其實不取決於其內容或宗派，而更多在於他的accessibility and availbility to local practitioners.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有