Aihwa Ong is Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley. Her books include Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (coedited with Stephen J. Collier); Buddha Is Hiding: Refugees, Citizenship, the New America; and Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, winner of the Association for Asian American Studies’ Cultural Studies Book Award and also published by Duke University Press.
Neoliberalism is commonly viewed as an economic doctrine that seeks to limit the scope of government. Some consider it a form of predatory capitalism with adverse effects on the Global South. In this groundbreaking work, Aihwa Ong offers an alternative view of neoliberalism as an extraordinarily malleable technology of governing that is taken up in different ways by different regimes, be they authoritarian, democratic, or communist. Ong shows how East and Southeast Asian states are making exceptions to their usual practices of governing in order to position themselves to compete in the global economy. As she demonstrates, a variety of neoliberal strategies of governing are re-engineering political spaces and populations. Ong’s ethnographic case studies illuminate experiments and developments such as China’s creation of special market zones within its socialist economy; pro-capitalist Islam and women’s rights in Malaysia; Singapore’s repositioning as a hub of scientific expertise; and flexible labor and knowledge regimes that span the Pacific.
Ong traces how these and other neoliberal exceptions to business as usual are reconfiguring relationships between governing and the governed, power and knowledge, and sovereignty and territoriality. She argues that an interactive mode of citizenship is emerging, one that organizes people—and distributes rights and benefits to them—according to their marketable skills rather than according to their membership within nation-states. Those whose knowledge and skills are not assigned significant market value—such as migrant women working as domestic maids in many Asian cities—are denied citizenship. Nevertheless, Ong suggests that as the seam between sovereignty and citizenship is pried apart, a new space is emerging for NGOs to advocate for the human rights of those excluded by neoliberal measures of human worthiness.
和Culture-based approach不一样的是,Ong所采取的governmentality approach开始尝试在不同context里研究neoliberalism,而不把neoliberalism当成一个overarching term。她看到了neoliberalism是受到efficiency和ethics的双重限制的,于是就有了neoliberalism as exception和ex...
評分和Culture-based approach不一样的是,Ong所采取的governmentality approach开始尝试在不同context里研究neoliberalism,而不把neoliberalism当成一个overarching term。她看到了neoliberalism是受到efficiency和ethics的双重限制的,于是就有了neoliberalism as exception和ex...
評分和Culture-based approach不一样的是,Ong所采取的governmentality approach开始尝试在不同context里研究neoliberalism,而不把neoliberalism当成一个overarching term。她看到了neoliberalism是受到efficiency和ethics的双重限制的,于是就有了neoliberalism as exception和ex...
評分和Culture-based approach不一样的是,Ong所采取的governmentality approach开始尝试在不同context里研究neoliberalism,而不把neoliberalism当成一个overarching term。她看到了neoliberalism是受到efficiency和ethics的双重限制的,于是就有了neoliberalism as exception和ex...
評分和Culture-based approach不一样的是,Ong所采取的governmentality approach开始尝试在不同context里研究neoliberalism,而不把neoliberalism当成一个overarching term。她看到了neoliberalism是受到efficiency和ethics的双重限制的,于是就有了neoliberalism as exception和ex...
方法和觀點是我贊同的,概念和術語的使用也很到位。但是在論證過程中,經驗材料的使用感覺還有點局限(需要擴充),大概是作者想覆蓋的範圍太大而篇幅有限的緣故吧。
评分想看看Ong如何引入Schmitt的political exception
评分就此。。ong aihwa 成功的殺進瞭俺周圍每一個人畢業論文的參考文獻列錶裏
评分主要關注兩點: de-articulation and re-articulation of citizenship, sovereignty and territoriality; 前麵那點是本行,以為寫的比較清楚,後麵的要麼是她沒寫清楚,要麼是我沒讀明白, 人類學角度來寫sovereignty and governmentality 始終還是脫不瞭Low-flying 的局限。
评分想看看Ong如何引入Schmitt的political exception
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有