图书标签: 政治学 民主崩溃 比较政治 美国政治 民主 Democracy 美国 History
发表于2024-10-03
How Democracies Die pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Donald Trump’s presidency has raised a question that many of us never thought we’d be asking: Is our democracy in danger? Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt have spent more than twenty years studying the breakdown of democracies in Europe and Latin America, and they believe the answer is yes. Democracy no longer ends with a bang—in a revolution or military coup—but with a whimper: the slow, steady weakening of critical institutions, such as the judiciary and the press, and the gradual erosion of long-standing political norms. The good news is that there are several exit ramps on the road to authoritarianism. The bad news is that, by electing Trump, we have already passed the first one.
Drawing on decades of research and a wide range of historical and global examples, from 1930s Europe to contemporary Hungary, Turkey, and Venezuela, to the American South during Jim Crow, Levitsky and Ziblatt show how democracies die—and how ours can be saved.
Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt are Professors of Government at Harvard University. Levitsky’s research focuses on Latin America and the developing world. He is the author of Competitive Authoritarianism and is the recipient of numerous teaching awards. Ziblatt studies Europe from the nineteenth century to the present. He is the author, most recently, of Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. Both Levitsky and Ziblatt have written for Vox and The New York Times, among other publications.
世界上没有完美的制度,只有抗造程度之分。即便是被尊为典范的美国民主,也需要政党和政治家(政客?)们用宽容、忍耐和克制来呵护。 当大家的行事哲学都变成“宁要选票,不要原则”“凡是敌人支持的,我们就反对”,那么大厦的倾圮也就没有那么不可想象了。
评分political parties are democracy's gatekeepers. Democracy work best and survive longest in countries where written rules are reinforced by unwritten rules, two of which are fundamental to a functioning democracy: mutual toleration and institutional forbearance. erosion of norms. Trump against both formal and informal rules. racial religi,eco-inequal
评分这种因川普而起的呼吁重新审视民主的书最多三星
评分历史流水账,狂黑共和党,总之无甚高论
评分好读,但的确有点隔夜茶的味道;只看了chap1679,第六章罗斯福新政,麦卡锡主义和水门事件;1-7-9的逻辑是从法西斯上台讲起,与其拉拢极端势力不如与政见不同的党派合作,不要为了获得多数而牺牲整个国家的民主(独裁者借机上位),第七章Gingrich到bush到Obama,美国引以为傲的tolerance和forbearance不见了,bipartisan越来越渺茫,第九章总结,美国民主能不死多少有运气&宪法稳固等等的成分;实际上最深刻的是两党合作是建立在去种族化的基础上的…简直是gridlock…这样下去trump一定会连任了…
撰文:Colin Kidd 翻译:陶小路 首发《东方历史评论》微信公号:ohistory 《伦敦书评》:民主遭遇中年危机? 1 自从2007年9月我在北岩银行一家分行外看到一长串焦虑的存款人以后,我心里产生了一种无法遏制的想法:20世纪30年代的历史可能部分在我们这个时代重演。北岩银行发生...
评分撰文:Colin Kidd 翻译:陶小路 首发《东方历史评论》微信公号:ohistory 《伦敦书评》:民主遭遇中年危机? 1 自从2007年9月我在北岩银行一家分行外看到一长串焦虑的存款人以后,我心里产生了一种无法遏制的想法:20世纪30年代的历史可能部分在我们这个时代重演。北岩银行发生...
评分撰文:Colin Kidd 翻译:陶小路 首发《东方历史评论》微信公号:ohistory 《伦敦书评》:民主遭遇中年危机? 1 自从2007年9月我在北岩银行一家分行外看到一长串焦虑的存款人以后,我心里产生了一种无法遏制的想法:20世纪30年代的历史可能部分在我们这个时代重演。北岩银行发生...
评分撰文:Colin Kidd 翻译:陶小路 首发《东方历史评论》微信公号:ohistory 《伦敦书评》:民主遭遇中年危机? 1 自从2007年9月我在北岩银行一家分行外看到一长串焦虑的存款人以后,我心里产生了一种无法遏制的想法:20世纪30年代的历史可能部分在我们这个时代重演。北岩银行发生...
评分撰文:Colin Kidd 翻译:陶小路 首发《东方历史评论》微信公号:ohistory 《伦敦书评》:民主遭遇中年危机? 1 自从2007年9月我在北岩银行一家分行外看到一长串焦虑的存款人以后,我心里产生了一种无法遏制的想法:20世纪30年代的历史可能部分在我们这个时代重演。北岩银行发生...
How Democracies Die pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024