Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in the Chinese-Speaking World

Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in the Chinese-Speaking World pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025

出版者:Lexington Books
作者:Kai Marchal
出品人:
頁數:290
译者:
出版時間:2017-2-24
價格:USD 105.00
裝幀:Hardcover
isbn號碼:9781498536264
叢書系列:
圖書標籤:
  • 政治哲學
  • 施特勞斯學派
  • 海外中國研究
  • 思想史
  • 英文原版
  • 現代性
  • 哲學
  • 中國
  • Carl Schmitt
  • Leo Strauss
  • Chinese-speaking world
  • political philosophy
  • intellectual history
  • modern thought
  • German thought
  • East Asia
  • political theory
  • academic reception
想要找書就要到 小美書屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

具體描述

Reorienting the Political examines the reception of Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in the Chinese-speaking world. The legacies of both Schmitt, the German legal theorist and thinker who joined the Nazi party, and Strauss, the German-Jewish classicist and political philosopher who became famous after his emigration to the United States, are highly controversial. Since the 1990s, however, these thinkers have had a powerful resonance for Chinese scholars. Today, when Chinese intellectuals debate the Chinese state, the future role of China in the world, the liberal international order, and even the meaning of Confucian civilization, they often employ Schmittian and Straussian concepts like "the political," "friend-enemy," "state of exception," "liberal education," and "natural right." The very possibility of a genuine Chinese political theory is often thought to be tied to the legacy of these two thinkers. This volume explores this complex phenomenon from a cross-cultural and inter-disciplinary perspective. The twelve essays in this volume are written from a range of perspectives by philosophers, political theorists, historians, and legal scholars from China, Germany, Taiwan, and the United States. This volume exemplifies theoretical engagements with the political theories of Schmitt and Strauss and their trans-cultural articulations.

著者簡介

Kai Marchal is associate professor in the Philosophy Department of Soochow University.

Carl K. Y. Shaw is research fellow at the Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, and professor in the Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University.

圖書目錄

Chapter 1 Three Strategies for Criticizing Liberalism and Their Continued Relevance
Chapter 2 Toward a Radical Critique of Liberalism: Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss in Contemporary Chinese Discourses
Chapter 3 From "Carl Schmitt on Mao" to "Carl Schmitt in China": Unsettled Issues and Unsettling Continuities
Chapter 4 The Tyranny of Values: Reflections on Schmitt and China
Chapter 5 Reading the Temperature Curve: Sinophone Schmitt-Fever in Context and Perspective
Chapter 6 Carl Schmitt Redux: Law and the Political in Contemporary Global Constitutionalism
Chapter 7 Carl Schmitt in Taiwanese Constitutional Law: An Incomplete Reception of Schmitt's Constitutional Theory
Chapter 8 Leo Strauss's Critique of the Political in a Sinophone Context
Chapter 9 Modernity, Tyranny, and Crisis: Leo Strauss in China
Chapter 10 On Leo Strauss as Negative Philosopher
Chapter 11 Mirror or Prism for Chinese Modernity? A Reading of Leo Strauss
Chapter 12 Toward a Taiwanese Cultural Renaissance: A Straussian Perspective
· · · · · · (收起)

讀後感

評分

对于西学的汲取,中国抱有强烈的工具理性倾向。Benjamin Schwartz曾举例,严复,On Liberty的译者,念兹再兹国家富强,误解了自由的价值,非将自由视为固有价值的纯粹信仰,而将自由贬抑为提振国力的手段。但Wang Hui(汪晖?)近来表示,严复不一定误解了Miller,他是借外来理...

評分

对于西学的汲取,中国抱有强烈的工具理性倾向。Benjamin Schwartz曾举例,严复,On Liberty的译者,念兹再兹国家富强,误解了自由的价值,非将自由视为固有价值的纯粹信仰,而将自由贬抑为提振国力的手段。但Wang Hui(汪晖?)近来表示,严复不一定误解了Miller,他是借外来理...

評分

对于西学的汲取,中国抱有强烈的工具理性倾向。Benjamin Schwartz曾举例,严复,On Liberty的译者,念兹再兹国家富强,误解了自由的价值,非将自由视为固有价值的纯粹信仰,而将自由贬抑为提振国力的手段。但Wang Hui(汪晖?)近来表示,严复不一定误解了Miller,他是借外来理...

評分

对于西学的汲取,中国抱有强烈的工具理性倾向。Benjamin Schwartz曾举例,严复,On Liberty的译者,念兹再兹国家富强,误解了自由的价值,非将自由视为固有价值的纯粹信仰,而将自由贬抑为提振国力的手段。但Wang Hui(汪晖?)近来表示,严复不一定误解了Miller,他是借外来理...

評分

对于西学的汲取,中国抱有强烈的工具理性倾向。Benjamin Schwartz曾举例,严复,On Liberty的译者,念兹再兹国家富强,误解了自由的价值,非将自由视为固有价值的纯粹信仰,而将自由贬抑为提振国力的手段。但Wang Hui(汪晖?)近来表示,严复不一定误解了Miller,他是借外来理...

用戶評價

评分

有個問題我沒想明白:為什麼中國知識分子那麼迷 Leo Strauss? 而不是其他思想傢?

评分

最好彆讀,耽誤時間

评分

有個問題我沒想明白:為什麼中國知識分子那麼迷 Leo Strauss? 而不是其他思想傢?

评分

SS之流的確比早先的尼采、薩特和弗洛伊德之流更值得注意。

评分

SS之流的確比早先的尼采、薩特和弗洛伊德之流更值得注意。

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有