图书标签: 文理教育  教育  想讀  学术  University  历史  中西对话  Wesleyan   

喜欢 Beyond the University 的读者还喜欢

• 
  學以為已 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载

All of the Chinese translation of "liberal arts" seems nonsense. “博雅” is for the aristocrat only; "素质“ means something else in Chinese context; “通才” is close to the core of the concept yet too scary. It is paramount to a “天才”. Moreover, they do not address the enemy of liberal arts education ---- pure vocational education.

Wesleyan University（美国文理学院）校长Michael S Roth写的，他首先从历史的角度去挖掘了文理教育 liberal art education的背景，比如托马斯杰佛逊，爱默生，再从美国的现状给出操作性的看法，聊了聊文理教育对于“整个人”的教育追求，和它的对立面－以职业为导向的教育。特别值得注意的是，他在结尾讨论到了他去北京大学做演讲，交流文理教育的事情，体会到了中国文化背景下，排应试教育开外，大家逐渐注意起来的－素质教育，也提出了很多展望。＝）

All of the Chinese translation of "liberal arts" seems nonsense. “博雅” is for the aristocrat only; "素质“ means something else in Chinese context; “通才” is close to the core of the concept yet too scary. It is paramount to a “天才”. Moreover, they do not address the enemy of liberal arts education ---- pure vocational education.

All of the Chinese translation of "liberal arts" seems nonsense. “博雅” is for the aristocrat only; "素质“ means something else in Chinese context; “通才” is close to the core of the concept yet too scary. It is paramount to a “天才”. Moreover, they do not address the enemy of liberal arts education ---- pure vocational education.

All of the Chinese translation of "liberal arts" seems nonsense. “博雅” is for the aristocrat only; "素质“ means something else in Chinese context; “通才” is close to the core of the concept yet too scary. It is paramount to a “天才”. Moreover, they do not address the enemy of liberal arts education ---- pure vocational education.