图书标签: 政治学 公民社会 社会学 中国政治 海外中国研究 威权主义 中国 威权韧性
发表于2024-12-22
Civil Society under Authoritarianism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Despite the dominant narrative of the repression of civil society in China, Civil Society Under Authoritarianism: The China Model argues that interactions between local officials and civil society facilitate a learning process, whereby each actor learns about the intentions and work processes of the other. Over the past two decades, often facilitated by foreign donors and problems within the general social framework, these interactions generated a process in which officials learned the benefits and disadvantages of civil society. Civil society supports local officials' efforts to provide social services and improve public policies, yet it also engages in protest and other activities that challenge social stability and development. This duality motivates local officials in China to construct a "social management" system - known as consultative authoritarianism - to encourage the beneficial aspects and discourage the dangerous ones. Although civil society has not democratized China, such organizations have facilitated greater dialogue between citizens and state as part of politics in an authoritarian system that normally lacks such channels for participation.
Jessica C. Teets is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department and Jeanne Epp Barksdale '48 Junior Faculty Fellow at Middlebury College, Vermont. Her research focuses on governance in authoritarian regimes - specifically the role of civil society such as non-profits, NGOs, and associations - with an emphasis on Chinese politics. She is the author, most recently, of 'Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China' (The China Quarterly, 2013) and 'Reforming Service Delivery in China: The Emergence of a Social Innovation Model' (Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2012). Dr Teets was recently selected to participate in the Public Intellectuals Program created by the National Committee on United States-China Relations.
结论和Spires说的几乎一样,把重点稍稍放在gov的learning process上。整体的论述在意料之中,没太多亮点。
评分感觉是目前最符合我观察到的现象的一本书。不过,其实也是在延伸Spires的说法。研究的组织多走的是高端大气政府合作路线,而非草根组织。把中国经验融入公民社会的整体理论的努力还是很有趣的(虽然最后一章我没怎么看)。
评分开篇解释协商式威权主义概念时废话过多,中段对北京、云南&江苏、四川研究细节糟糕有用信息过少,而结尾时联系俄国的Sovereign Democracy又太过匆忙。但不可否认,这个非dichotomous对公民社会的理解增添了很多的空间,尤其是那个learning policy process可以多加讨论,信息传播和关系网是发展中最好的对策方法,公民社会对民主化的推动确实不是单方向的而可能imrpove governance。本书最大的帮助就是提供了很多的名词、NGO列表、和学术参考文献,也为我进一步理解公民社会奠定了理论基础,书中涉及的NGO组织和行动具有借鉴价值。需要选定NGOs学习、阅读1980s的Decentralization过程、适当了解新左派的思潮以及重要公共管理政策 Chris
评分西溪西文书库;太繁琐了8
评分感觉是目前最符合我观察到的现象的一本书。不过,其实也是在延伸Spires的说法。研究的组织多走的是高端大气政府合作路线,而非草根组织。把中国经验融入公民社会的整体理论的努力还是很有趣的(虽然最后一章我没怎么看)。
评分
评分
评分
评分
Civil Society under Authoritarianism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024