Civil Society under Authoritarianism

Civil Society under Authoritarianism pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:Cambridge University Press
作者:Jessica C. Teets
出品人:
页数:252
译者:
出版时间:2014-6-9
价格:USD 85.00
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9781107038752
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 政治学
  • 公民社会
  • 社会学
  • 中国政治
  • 海外中国研究
  • 威权主义
  • 中国
  • 威权韧性
  • 公民社会
  • 威权主义
  • 政治体制
  • 社会组织
  • 治理结构
  • 权力约束
  • 社会动员
  • 非政府组织
  • 公民参与
  • 制度韧性
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Despite the dominant narrative of the repression of civil society in China, Civil Society Under Authoritarianism: The China Model argues that interactions between local officials and civil society facilitate a learning process, whereby each actor learns about the intentions and work processes of the other. Over the past two decades, often facilitated by foreign donors and problems within the general social framework, these interactions generated a process in which officials learned the benefits and disadvantages of civil society. Civil society supports local officials' efforts to provide social services and improve public policies, yet it also engages in protest and other activities that challenge social stability and development. This duality motivates local officials in China to construct a "social management" system - known as consultative authoritarianism - to encourage the beneficial aspects and discourage the dangerous ones. Although civil society has not democratized China, such organizations have facilitated greater dialogue between citizens and state as part of politics in an authoritarian system that normally lacks such channels for participation.

作者简介

Jessica C. Teets is an Assistant Professor in the Political Science Department and Jeanne Epp Barksdale '48 Junior Faculty Fellow at Middlebury College, Vermont. Her research focuses on governance in authoritarian regimes - specifically the role of civil society such as non-profits, NGOs, and associations - with an emphasis on Chinese politics. She is the author, most recently, of 'Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China' (The China Quarterly, 2013) and 'Reforming Service Delivery in China: The Emergence of a Social Innovation Model' (Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2012). Dr Teets was recently selected to participate in the Public Intellectuals Program created by the National Committee on United States-China Relations.

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

开篇解释协商式威权主义概念时废话过多,中段对北京、云南&江苏、四川研究细节糟糕有用信息过少,而结尾时联系俄国的Sovereign Democracy又太过匆忙。但不可否认,这个非dichotomous对公民社会的理解增添了很多的空间,尤其是那个learning policy process可以多加讨论,信息传播和关系网是发展中最好的对策方法,公民社会对民主化的推动确实不是单方向的而可能imrpove governance。本书最大的帮助就是提供了很多的名词、NGO列表、和学术参考文献,也为我进一步理解公民社会奠定了理论基础,书中涉及的NGO组织和行动具有借鉴价值。需要选定NGOs学习、阅读1980s的Decentralization过程、适当了解新左派的思潮以及重要公共管理政策 Chris

评分

1、把公民社会化约成NGO十分不可取。和社运失去联系的NGO很容易萎缩。虽然看起来很蓬勃,有时候还能递上去一点政策建议;2、夸大了CA模型的稳定性。政府管理的手段不在于设置了正反两方面的激励,而在于这些激励的标准从来都不公开透明。今天还在合法的地带,明天就整你。3、主要问题在于靶子不行。自由主义的公民社会理论本来就更偏意识形态一点,并无可观的经验研究支持。对法团主义的批判稍有价值。

评分

3.5 operational autonomy, a continuum rather than dichotomy. yet, demand-supply logic rather than institutionalization, not stable. definition of civil society. did not consider the structural factor, when political space becomes narrower, hidden transcripts? missing theoretical framework that can travel across time and leadership.

评分

consultative authoritarianism and illiberal wave,参考文献部分很多错误,差评!

评分

我觉得作者在内容安排上有点混乱,最后一部分显得仓促。当然,作者提出的Consultative Authoritarianism 还是提供了一种全新的视角去看待中国公民社会的发展,思路值得学习。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有