Nietzsche wrote in a scientific culture transformed by Darwin. He read extensively in German and British Darwinists, and his own works dealt often with such obvious Darwinian themes as struggle and evolution. Yet most of what Nietzsche said about Darwin was hostile: he sharply attacked many of his ideas, and often slurred Darwin himself as mediocre. So most readers of Nietzsche have inferred that he must have cast Darwin quite aside. But in fact, John Richardson argues, Nietzsche was deeply and pervasively influenced by Darwin. He stressed his disagreements, but was silent about several core points he took over from Darwin Moreover, Richardson claims, these Darwinian borrowings were to Nietzsches credit: when we bring them to the surface we discover his positions to be much stronger than we had thought. Even Nietzsches radical innovations are more plausible when we expose their Darwinian ground; we see that they amount to a new Darwinism.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
条理清晰。并非简单拿尼采思想与达尔文（主义）比较一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反达尔文的论辩生发出对人类价值演进的社会选择解释，将其与自然选择的逻辑区分开，纠正了旧的达尔文主义，成为“模因”理论的先声。这两种选择所塑造的价值的冲突是尼采要医治的人之病症，而出路在于真正的“自我选择”。
评分条理清晰。并非简单拿尼采思想与达尔文（主义）比较一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反达尔文的论辩生发出对人类价值演进的社会选择解释，将其与自然选择的逻辑区分开，纠正了旧的达尔文主义，成为“模因”理论的先声。这两种选择所塑造的价值的冲突是尼采要医治的人之病症，而出路在于真正的“自我选择”。
评分条理清晰。并非简单拿尼采思想与达尔文（主义）比较一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反达尔文的论辩生发出对人类价值演进的社会选择解释，将其与自然选择的逻辑区分开，纠正了旧的达尔文主义，成为“模因”理论的先声。这两种选择所塑造的价值的冲突是尼采要医治的人之病症，而出路在于真正的“自我选择”。
评分条理清晰。并非简单拿尼采思想与达尔文（主义）比较一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反达尔文的论辩生发出对人类价值演进的社会选择解释，将其与自然选择的逻辑区分开，纠正了旧的达尔文主义，成为“模因”理论的先声。这两种选择所塑造的价值的冲突是尼采要医治的人之病症，而出路在于真正的“自我选择”。
评分条理清晰。并非简单拿尼采思想与达尔文（主义）比较一番，而是把尼采看作用貌似反达尔文的论辩生发出对人类价值演进的社会选择解释，将其与自然选择的逻辑区分开，纠正了旧的达尔文主义，成为“模因”理论的先声。这两种选择所塑造的价值的冲突是尼采要医治的人之病症，而出路在于真正的“自我选择”。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有