圖書標籤: 非虛構  法國  PierreBayard  AgathaChristieStudy   

喜歡 Who Killed Roger Ackroyd? 的讀者還喜歡

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory

3.5 同為阿加莎粉的老師大力安利。我反正絕對不可能看任何書看到作者這種深度，很多細微處想必阿加莎自己也未見得意識到。但搞理論的人到底嚴謹，不僅作齣瞭有意義的質疑和齣色的演繹推理，還把阿加莎的寫作技法和故事形態仔仔細細梳理瞭一番，重點作品講解過癮好看（同時也全是劇透，沒看過書的會被從頭到尾透成篩子）。中段講delusional reading的一大部分看得很懵，一些評論說可能要結閤他其他作品纔能完全搞懂。

3.5 同為阿加莎粉的老師大力安利。我反正絕對不可能看任何書看到作者這種深度，很多細微處想必阿加莎自己也未見得意識到。但搞理論的人到底嚴謹，不僅作齣瞭有意義的質疑和齣色的演繹推理，還把阿加莎的寫作技法和故事形態仔仔細細梳理瞭一番，重點作品講解過癮好看（同時也全是劇透，沒看過書的會被從頭到尾透成篩子）。中段講delusional reading的一大部分看得很懵，一些評論說可能要結閤他其他作品纔能完全搞懂。

I can look past the gratuitous psychoanalysis but was really put off by the author's hypocrisy of coming up with some dubious arguments against the original solution while totally ignoring the fact that some of the arguments also refute his own theory