Lawrence Freedman has been Professor of War Studies at King's College London since 1982, and Vice-Principal since 2003. Elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 1995 and awarded the CBE in 1996, he was appointed Official Historian of the Falklands Campaign in 1997. He was awarded the KCMG in 2003. In June 2009 he was appointed to serve as a member of the official inquiry into Britain and the 2003 Iraq War. Professor Freedman has written extensively on nuclear strategy and the cold war, as well as commentating regularly on contemporary security issues. His most recent book, A Choice of Enemies: America Confronts the Middle East, won the 2009 Lionel Gelber Prize and Duke of Westminster Medal for Military Literature.
In Strategy: A History, Sir Lawrence Freedman, one of the world's leading authorities on war and international politics, captures the vast history of strategic thinking, in a consistently engaging and insightful account of how strategy came to pervade every aspect of our lives.
The range of Freedman's narrative is extraordinary, moving from the surprisingly advanced strategy practiced in primate groups, to the opposing strategies of Achilles and Odysseus in The Iliad, the strategic advice of Sun Tzu and Machiavelli, the great military innovations of Baron Henri de Jomini and Carl von Clausewitz, the grounding of revolutionary strategy in class struggles by Marx, the insights into corporate strategy found in Peter Drucker and Alfred Sloan, and the contributions of the leading social scientists working on strategy today. The core issue at the heart of strategy, the author notes, is whether it is possible to manipulate and shape our environment rather than simply become the victim of forces beyond one's control. Time and again, Freedman demonstrates that the inherent unpredictability of this environment-subject to chance events, the efforts of opponents, the missteps of friends-provides strategy with its challenge and its drama. Armies or corporations or nations rarely move from one predictable state of affairs to another, but instead feel their way through a series of states, each one not quite what was anticipated, requiring a reappraisal of the original strategy, including its ultimate objective. Thus the picture of strategy that emerges in this book is one that is fluid and flexible, governed by the starting point, not the end point.
A brilliant overview of the most prominent strategic theories in history, from David's use of deception against Goliath, to the modern use of game theory in economics, this masterful volume sums up a lifetime of reflection on strategy.
1.战略不同于战术。我觉得罗胖子说的对,战略就是围棋,战略的目的在于找到下一个平衡点。 2.孙子兵法教我们的就是要以强胜弱。就算是以少胜多,也是局部优势以强胜弱的集合。 3.战争摩擦力这个点值得多阐述。 4.看这个书的时候正好新冠在闹腾。知道自己是在战时还是平时太重要...
评分劳伦斯·弗里德曼爵士(1948—)为伦敦国王学院的荣休教授,英国枢密院成员、英国学术院院士。他的主要研究领域为战略、核战略理论、国际关系、冷战和军事史。他曾担任伦敦国王学院副校长和战争研究系主任。他是福克兰战争的英国官方史官和伊拉克战争调查委员会成员。 他的《战...
评分1.战略不同于战术。我觉得罗胖子说的对,战略就是围棋,战略的目的在于找到下一个平衡点。 2.孙子兵法教我们的就是要以强胜弱。就算是以少胜多,也是局部优势以强胜弱的集合。 3.战争摩擦力这个点值得多阐述。 4.看这个书的时候正好新冠在闹腾。知道自己是在战时还是平时太重要...
评分1.战略不同于战术。我觉得罗胖子说的对,战略就是围棋,战略的目的在于找到下一个平衡点。 2.孙子兵法教我们的就是要以强胜弱。就算是以少胜多,也是局部优势以强胜弱的集合。 3.战争摩擦力这个点值得多阐述。 4.看这个书的时候正好新冠在闹腾。知道自己是在战时还是平时太重要...
评分1.战略不同于战术。我觉得罗胖子说的对,战略就是围棋,战略的目的在于找到下一个平衡点。 2.孙子兵法教我们的就是要以强胜弱。就算是以少胜多,也是局部优势以强胜弱的集合。 3.战争摩擦力这个点值得多阐述。 4.看这个书的时候正好新冠在闹腾。知道自己是在战时还是平时太重要...
An exemplary work of academic writing, in terms of conceptualization and operationalization, and framing. 然而听得并不走心
评分An exemplary work of academic writing, in terms of conceptualization and operationalization, and framing. 然而听得并不走心
评分写军事策略、政治策略(包括民权运动、工会斗争等)和商业策略。我原以为自己会最喜欢军事策略部分,结果发现,现代军事策略已经发展到非常抽象的程度,远远beyond我这种扶手椅军事家了。。。政治和商业策略的部分都非常精彩
评分An exemplary work of academic writing, in terms of conceptualization and operationalization, and framing. 然而听得并不走心
评分写军事策略、政治策略(包括民权运动、工会斗争等)和商业策略。我原以为自己会最喜欢军事策略部分,结果发现,现代军事策略已经发展到非常抽象的程度,远远beyond我这种扶手椅军事家了。。。政治和商业策略的部分都非常精彩
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有