Sit back and enjoy a collection of verbatim exchanges from the halls of justice, where defendants and plaintiffs, lawyers and witnesses, juries and judges, collide to produce memorably insane comedy. The Court: "The charge here is theft of frozen chickens. Are you the defendant, sir?" Defendant: "No, sir, I'm the guy who stole the chickens."
具体描述
读后感
Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
评分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
评分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
评分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
评分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
用户评价
Just for entertainment not informative...
评分不是那个很萌很搞笑的贴的出处。也有亮段子不过没有一个比那贴好笑。更像是真正的庭审实录。Fractured moment嘛，也不都是笑点，也有冷场点......
评分雖然老套，但真心蠻搞笑的。
评分这本书是因为看了一篇豆文好奇去买的。可惜英文版并不如当初看到的那么好玩。可能原因（1）英文词有好多俺不懂（2）豆瓣文写得太好了，把精华都包括进去了。
评分對這本並不是格外感興趣，特別閒的時候當作笑話書來讀的（其實也就類似笑話集嘛）；選修那幾門法律研究的時候看到裡面的某些橋段的確會會心一笑～ 不過作者本身是本著收集法庭幽默事件為目的撰寫的專欄然後合集出的這本書，內容不算貧乏卻欠缺文采。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有