The history of footbinding is full of contradictions and unexpected turns. The practice originated in the dance culture of China's medieval court and spread to gentry families, brothels, maid's quarters, and peasant households. Conventional views of footbinding as patriarchal oppression often neglect its complex history and the incentives of the women involved. This revisionist history, elegantly written and meticulously researched, presents a fascinating new picture of the practice from its beginnings in the tenth century to its demise in the twentieth century. Neither condemning nor defending foot-binding, Dorothy Ko debunks many myths and misconceptions about its origins, development, and eventual end, exploring in the process the entanglements of male power and female desires during the practice's thousand-year history. "Cinderella's Sisters" argues that rather than stemming from sexual perversion, men's desire for bound feet was connected to larger concerns such as cultural nostalgia, regional rivalries, and claims of male privilege. Nor were women hapless victims, the author contends. Ko describes how women - those who could afford it - bound their own and their daughters' feet to signal their high status and self-respect. Femininity, like the binding of feet, was associated with bodily labor and domestic work, and properly bound feet and beautifully made shoes both required exquisite skills and technical knowledge passed from generation to generation. Throughout her narrative, Ko deftly wields methods of social history, literary criticism, material culture studies, and the history of the body and fashion to illustrate how a practice that began as embodied lyricism - as a way to live as the poets imagined - ended up being an exercise in excess and folly.
高彦颐,(Dorothy Ko) 美国斯坦福大学国际关系学学士、东亚历史系博士,专攻明清社会史及比较妇女史。曾任教加州大学圣地亚哥分校及新泽西州立罗格斯大学历史及妇女研究系,现为纽约哥伦比亚大学巴纳德分校历史系教授。近作有《步步生莲:绣鞋与缠足文物》(Every Step a Lotus:Shoes for BoundFeet)及《闺塾师:明末清初江南的才女文化》(TeaeheFS of the Inner Chambers:Women andCulture in Seventeenth—Century China)等书。
“缠足”这一话题产生了多久就谈论了多久,但无非都以谴责封建思想对妇女的压制为主,而高彦颐以不同的视角给我们呈现了一部缠足史,展现了不同的内涵。在这部书中,女性的声音没有被埋没,女性被真正的作为一个话语主体而呈现出来。 “玉足三寸波澜显,青瓦一片苔痕见”,女...
评分「缠足」历来被认为是中国妇女史上一个残忍的,甚至带有文化污点式的行为。之前我也并未怀疑过这样的观点,觉得裹脚布就是对女性身体最直接的束缚。但是,读罢高彦颐教授《缠足》一书中的章节,我发现二十世纪初「放足」运动的实施远比想象的复杂,其背后的动机也并非单纯...
评分“缠足”这一话题产生了多久就谈论了多久,但无非都以谴责封建思想对妇女的压制为主,而高彦颐以不同的视角给我们呈现了一部缠足史,展现了不同的内涵。在这部书中,女性的声音没有被埋没,女性被真正的作为一个话语主体而呈现出来。 “玉足三寸波澜显,青瓦一片苔痕见”,女...
评分之前看完写了这样一段短评: 令人手不释卷的那种好看,尤其翻译也好,不过第四、五章看得我很晕。作者尤其敏感的是近现代中国的男性精英在落后的焦虑之下,使用民族-国家和种族进化的话语重新规训和打压女性。她认为在缠足史中女性并非是全然被动的受害者,而是仍然具有一定的...
评分金莲足与高跟鞋 Ⅰ“金莲”神话 缠足,作为一项为古代华夏民族中所独有的奇异习俗,如今似乎早已在现代国人的生活中销声匿迹,但作为一种文化现象却依然存在诸多未解的迷思。而高跟鞋作为一种风靡全球的时尚鞋制,也早已成为现代都市中摩登女郎们的足下必备之物,但其本质...
revisionist in a positive sense
评分谁在替谁发声~
评分感觉现在好多revionist啊...私以为本书其实就是替当时的保守派人士发声。其实当时的保守派人士就是看到了旧制度的优点。
评分每一章单独拿出来都是很好的research (特别是山西的放足运动那一章),但组合在一起就显得刻意和奇怪。花大力气证明记录缠足的文字材料不可靠,大多是男性和性有关的想象。直到最后一章(还包括倒数第二章的最后几节)才开始从女性身体与物质文化的角度讨论问题。其实全书严格说并不是关于缠足的修正历史,而是关于缠足之想象的历史。
评分作者的論證和想像力的確讓人欽佩。但是這種高高在上的文化相對主義讓人很不舒服。就因為纏足的話語是多樣的,之前的單一受害者的形象是片面建構的,就因為現在各類瘦身美容同樣傷害婦女的身體,就因為可以傾聽所謂婦女身體之中隱藏的喃喃之語,就可以否定反對纏足的正面意義(雖然作者反復強調她沒有這個意圖)?我當然贊成打破那種非黑即白的二元思維,但是假如讓高教授和她的女兒們也來一次纏足,她還會是那種態度嗎?難道當聽到女兒們哭著說 媽媽我疼 的時候,她依然可以說,別哭, 這正是體現我們女人的 主體性 和能動性 的時候了!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有