司各特•索姆斯系普林斯顿大学哲学教授,著有《超越严格性》和《理解真理》,他是《句法论证和英语的结构》的作者之一,以及《命题与态度》的编者之一 。
This is a major, wide-ranging history of analytic philosophy since 1900, told by one of the tradition's leading contemporary figures. The first volume takes the story from 1900 to mid-century. The second brings the history up to date.
As Scott Soames tells it, the story of analytic philosophy is one of great but uneven progress, with leading thinkers making important advances toward solving the tradition's core problems. Though no broad philosophical position ever achieved lasting dominance, Soames argues that two methodological developments have, over time, remade the philosophical landscape. These are (1) analytic philosophers' hard-won success in understanding, and distinguishing the notions of logical truth, a priori truth, and necessary truth, and (2) gradual acceptance of the idea that philosophical speculation must be grounded in sound prephilosophical thought. Though Soames views this history in a positive light, he also illustrates the difficulties, false starts, and disappointments endured along the way. As he engages with the work of his predecessors and contemporaries--from Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein to Donald Davidson and Saul Kripke--he seeks to highlight their accomplishments while also pinpointing their shortcomings, especially where their perspectives were limited by an incomplete grasp of matters that have now become clear.
Soames himself has been at the center of some of the tradition's most important debates, and throughout writes with exceptional ease about its often complex ideas. His gift for clear exposition makes the history as accessible to advanced undergraduates as it will be important to scholars. Despite its centrality to philosophy in the English-speaking world, the analytic tradition in philosophy has had very few synthetic histories. This will be the benchmark against which all future accounts will be measured.
很高兴仲海霞和张励耕翻译了我的这两卷书,希望它们能够助中国的学生和学者更充分地参与到哲学的分析传统中去。这两卷书向读者介绍了分析传统中一个重要的部分,大约从1900年到1975年。虽然相对于一个已有数千年历史的学科而言,这似乎只是一段短暂的时期,但在此期间出版作品...
评分很高兴仲海霞和张励耕翻译了我的这两卷书,希望它们能够助中国的学生和学者更充分地参与到哲学的分析传统中去。这两卷书向读者介绍了分析传统中一个重要的部分,大约从1900年到1975年。虽然相对于一个已有数千年历史的学科而言,这似乎只是一段短暂的时期,但在此期间出版作品...
评分很高兴仲海霞和张励耕翻译了我的这两卷书,希望它们能够助中国的学生和学者更充分地参与到哲学的分析传统中去。这两卷书向读者介绍了分析传统中一个重要的部分,大约从1900年到1975年。虽然相对于一个已有数千年历史的学科而言,这似乎只是一段短暂的时期,但在此期间出版作品...
评分很高兴仲海霞和张励耕翻译了我的这两卷书,希望它们能够助中国的学生和学者更充分地参与到哲学的分析传统中去。这两卷书向读者介绍了分析传统中一个重要的部分,大约从1900年到1975年。虽然相对于一个已有数千年历史的学科而言,这似乎只是一段短暂的时期,但在此期间出版作品...
评分对西方哲学史有所涉猎的读者大概知道哲学史家温德尔班的名著《哲学史教程》乃是以康德为中心叙述的哲学史。温德尔班是一个典型的康德主义者,在他眼里西方哲学史分为三个阶段:康德之前的哲学、康德哲学和康德之后的哲学。以此类比,当代美国语言哲学家斯各特·索莫斯(Scott S...
excellent work!
评分终于可以暂时画上句号。罗素还得看看《数理哲学导论》。
评分没讲frege是因为他太有技术含量。。╮(╯▽╰)╭ 各种好。。
评分jeff ~~....
评分太繁琐!介绍罗素的逻辑主义部分不错
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有