图书标签: 政治学 state 社会学 比较政治 politics 国家主义范式 政治 政治社会学
发表于2024-11-24
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Product Description
Until recently, dominant theoretical paradigms in the comparative social sciences did not highlight states as organizational structures or as potentially autonomous actors. Indeed, the term 'state' was rarely used. Current work, however, increasingly views the state as an agent which, although influenced by the society that surrounds it, also shapes social and political processes. The contributors to this volume, which includes some of the best recent interdisciplinary scholarship on states in relation to social structures, make use of theoretically engaged comparative and historical investigations to provide improved conceptualizations of states and how they operate. Each of the book's major parts presents a related set of analytical issues about modern states, which are explored in the context of a wide range of times and places, both contemporary and historical, and in developing and advanced-industrial nations. The first part examines state strategies in newly developing countries. The second part analyzes war making and state making in early modern Europe, and discusses states in relation to the post-World War II international economy. The third part pursues new insights into how states influence political cleavages and collective action. In the final chapter, the editors bring together the questions raised by the contributors and suggest tentative conclusions that emerge from an overview of all the articles. As a programmatic work that proposes new directions for the analysis of modern states, the volume will appeal to a wide range of teachers and students of political science, political economy, sociology, history, and anthropology.
Peter Evans is best known for his work on the comparative political economy of national development, exemplified by his 1995 book Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation and a recent series of articles on the “21st Century Developmental State.” For the past several years he has been researching the ways in which social movements can mobilize transnationally to build a “counter-hegemonic globalization.” Among these movements, the global labor movement is a key actor. See his 2008 article, “Is an Alternative Globalization Possible?” and his 2010 article “Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize?”
Theda Skocpol (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is professor emeritus of sociology and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor emeritus of International Studies. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.His books include Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research (Princeton University Press, forthcoming in 2009); Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambribge University Press, 2003, co-edited with J. Mahoney); Participation and Democracy East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations (M. E. Sharpe, 1998, co-edited with M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock); States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton University Press, 1996, co-edited with Th. Skocpol); Capitalist Development and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1992, co-authored with E. H. Stephens and J. D. Stephen); Power and the Division of Labour (Stanford University Press, 1986); and Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985, co-edited with P.B. Evans and Th. Skocpol).
我发现自己实在很记挂skocpol,就快要演变为2个凡是了。。。
评分#Soc140 Chap5 Tilly
评分“找回国家”可能有点言过其实,但丝毫不影响所选文章的价值。大佬们在文集里主要讨论了两个问题:如何在比较研究中考虑各国独特的历史因素;如何在国家-社会、政治-经济的互动中动态地、相对地分析国家能力。前者开启了历史制度主义和多样化资本主义的潮流,后者催生了对国家能力的再概念化和新框架的诞生。重点读了Tilly, Katzestein, Katznelson和Stepan的文章,后三篇都堪称splitter式研究的范文。也许读完还是对“what is the state”一脸懵逼,但所选文章对历史-比较、理论-实证、一般框架-个案细节这几对关系的分析和呈现方式,让本书成为比较研究或许最好的handbook之一。 #比较研究真有趣# #疫情期间的日常不务正业
评分貌似出了中译本
评分学科的演进总是诸如此类前进三步,退后两步,看看情况,争论一番再继续前进的节奏。学科议题的多元化和某一时刻压倒性随大流的单极化,大概也总是这种曲折中前进的反映。政治学充满了大的名词,最初进入这一领域的时候,总是有人这样说的。虽然后来绝大多数人都是进入了一些自我感动和陶醉的细枝末节的,其实一般社会人看来毫不重要和理解不能的问题之上。现在多少想来,是我们通过学习方法和更加细致化的形式化理论从而变得更加“聪明"和不再幼稚了呢,还是我们自己变得更加庸俗和为了谋生,而怎样能够发表怎样来的赶脚?这样一想,多少又有些暧昧化了(笑)。不过此类问题未来的研究,多少在更加细致化的民主政治理论和公共选择或者投票,利益团体既有实证研究之上的议题展开,大概也是一种方式吧。
这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024