图书标签: 政治学 state 社会学 比较政治 politics 国家主义范式 政治 政治社会学
发表于2024-12-26
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Product Description
Until recently, dominant theoretical paradigms in the comparative social sciences did not highlight states as organizational structures or as potentially autonomous actors. Indeed, the term 'state' was rarely used. Current work, however, increasingly views the state as an agent which, although influenced by the society that surrounds it, also shapes social and political processes. The contributors to this volume, which includes some of the best recent interdisciplinary scholarship on states in relation to social structures, make use of theoretically engaged comparative and historical investigations to provide improved conceptualizations of states and how they operate. Each of the book's major parts presents a related set of analytical issues about modern states, which are explored in the context of a wide range of times and places, both contemporary and historical, and in developing and advanced-industrial nations. The first part examines state strategies in newly developing countries. The second part analyzes war making and state making in early modern Europe, and discusses states in relation to the post-World War II international economy. The third part pursues new insights into how states influence political cleavages and collective action. In the final chapter, the editors bring together the questions raised by the contributors and suggest tentative conclusions that emerge from an overview of all the articles. As a programmatic work that proposes new directions for the analysis of modern states, the volume will appeal to a wide range of teachers and students of political science, political economy, sociology, history, and anthropology.
Peter Evans is best known for his work on the comparative political economy of national development, exemplified by his 1995 book Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation and a recent series of articles on the “21st Century Developmental State.” For the past several years he has been researching the ways in which social movements can mobilize transnationally to build a “counter-hegemonic globalization.” Among these movements, the global labor movement is a key actor. See his 2008 article, “Is an Alternative Globalization Possible?” and his 2010 article “Is it Labor’s Turn to Globalize?”
Theda Skocpol (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is professor emeritus of sociology and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor emeritus of International Studies. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.His books include Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research (Princeton University Press, forthcoming in 2009); Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences (Cambribge University Press, 2003, co-edited with J. Mahoney); Participation and Democracy East and West: Comparisons and Interpretations (M. E. Sharpe, 1998, co-edited with M. Rueschemeyer and B. Wittrock); States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton University Press, 1996, co-edited with Th. Skocpol); Capitalist Development and Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 1992, co-authored with E. H. Stephens and J. D. Stephen); Power and the Division of Labour (Stanford University Press, 1986); and Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge University Press, 1985, co-edited with P.B. Evans and Th. Skocpol).
看过两篇,skocpol 和stepan, 用skocpol的话说,这书是setting agenda的开创性著作
评分学界弄潮产物,有理论意识的重要篇章后来发展成专著或汇编书。严格地说国家或对国家的意识在社科研究中从没缺位过,说“带回国家”口气甚大,其实是以结构(功能)视角突出国家作为单一变量的重要作用。理论篇章整合前代理论,凸显国家为有自主能力、具体形构、与社会有具体边界,中世纪以来功能分化兴起处理权威分配、垄断军事资源、有庞大官僚层级的组织,并形塑阶级、社团、公民社会、政党等政治行动者的行动规则和环境,但经验研究操作上又将国家打散为不同部门、不同精英、不同机关(行政立法司法等),其不同组织架构与功能与社会各团体产生不同联系,在具体议题上呈现各国不同做法。此两者的微妙内在张力似显示,国家其实一直在社会中,或者国家社会两者根本是功能结构分化而已,边界是动态的,只是某些情境下国家部门作用特别明显可见而已。
评分一方面,国家是一个有着相对独立的利益取向和目标的组织,实现目标的能力或强或弱;另一方面,国家也塑造了包括阶级、政党等社会的行动者的政治斗争的环境和规则。记下这两句话就行。理由正如序言所述——其它问题全都要具体问题具体分析。。。
评分关于经济的部分就以后再看吧不着急。Tilly那篇不用说。第三部分的三篇都很有意思,尤其Stepan关于BA政体和civil society的相互作用的论述很有启发,state为了维系legitimacy需要both offensive and defensive projects,前者失灵的时候就靠制造恐慌来维持国民的依赖;而两个都失灵之后的某个时刻军政府的军队部分和政府部分产生分裂政权就崩盘了。然而把state与society完全割裂开的分析方法在后来被很多人批判过,因为交互太多无法找到一个确切的界限。用Stepan的例子来说,巴西的商界受到state影响多少受到civil society影响又有多少,智利的state enterprise属于state还是society呢?
评分一方面,国家是一个有着相对独立的利益取向和目标的组织,实现目标的能力或强或弱;另一方面,国家也塑造了包括阶级、政党等社会的行动者的政治斗争的环境和规则。记下这两句话就行。理由正如序言所述——其它问题全都要具体问题具体分析。。。
这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
评分这本书给了我很大的震撼,虽然这本书在1985年就已经面世,但它所提出的许多观点在二十一世纪的今天读来仍未觉得过时,文章对许多问题的探讨都百家云集,这就是我们现在常说的“神仙打架”吧。 这本书的很多内容采取了分析归纳法和历史比较来研究国家,试图使人们更加了解国家的...
Bringing the State Back In pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024