Book Description
In Art: A New History, Paul Johnson turns his great gifts as a world historian to a subject that has enthralled him all his life: the history of art. This narrative account, from the earliest cave paintings up to the present day, has new things to say about almost every period of art. Taking account of changing scholarship and shifting opinions, he draws our attention to a number of neglected artists and styles, especially in Scandinavia, Germany, Russia and the Americas.
Paul Johnson puts the creative originality of the individual at the heart of his story. He pays particular attention to key periods: the emergence of the artistic personality in the Renaissance, the new realism of the early seventeenth century, the discovery of landscape painting as a separate art form, and the rise of ideological art. He notes the division of 'fashion art' and fine art at the beginning of the twentieth century, and how it has now widened.
Though challenging and controversial, Paul Johnson is not primarily a revisionist. He is a passionate lover of beauty who finds creativity in many places. With 300 colour illustrations, this book is vivid, evocative and immensely readable, whether the author is describing the beauty of Egyptian low-relief carving or the medieval cathedrals of Europe, the watercolours of Thomas Girtin or the utility of Roman bridges ('the best bridges in history'), the genius of Andrew Wyeth or the tranquility of the Great Mosque at Damascus, the paintings of Ilya Repin or a carpet-page from the Lindisfarne Gospels. The warmth and enthusiasm of Paul Johnson's descriptions will send readers hurrying off to see these wonders for themselves.
From Publishers Weekly
Having produced in a fairly short span equally weighty histories of the Jewish diaspora, the modern world and America, as well as a number of smaller books and a stream of articles, near-septuagenarian Johnson, historian, journalist, conservative gadfly and Sunday painter, has produced a massive and contentious history of art. Johnson (Intellectuals) is a product not of the cloistered academy but of the rough-and-tumble world of British journalism (before his conversion to Toryism he edited the left weekly New Statesman). While his narrative is for the most part a conventional journey through the canon, his headlong pace, quirky views and pungent prose make it anything but dull. The quick, forceful judgments Johnson makes on the art and artists he encounters are always amusing and sometimes enlightening, particularly his attention to the undervalued "regional" realist traditions of the 19th century. But the tone of constant bluff provocation can become wearying, and the book's putative polemical mission-to help develop an appreciation of art that would help "society defend itself against cultural breakdown"-doesn't really make itself felt until the book's last and weakest section, a rather scanty section on modernism and postmodernism that is pure New Criterion-style cultural conservatism. All writers of single volume art histories must contend with the rightly ubiquitous and magisterial Janson and Gombrich, and despite its wealth of free-flowing ideas and 300 handsome reproductions, Johnson's book (which also lacks a bibliography and footnotes) simply cannot compete. But as a passionate amateur's personal survey, the first seven-eighths of Johnson's history bring a refreshing sense of bluntness to an often staid tradition.
From Booklist
Johnson, an eminent, versatile, and opinionated historian, is also a successful painter, and he now indulges his lifelong passion for art in a gorgeously illustrated and provocative interpretation of the evolution of Western art. Johnson believes that art is essential to humankind's well-being, and he begins his great trek by marveling over the sophistication of cave paintings and the continuity of vision over many generations required for the building of Stonehenge and Europe's magnificent medieval cathedrals. As he summarizes the worldview, aesthetics, and technologies of each culture he so fluently analyzes, from the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, to the Normans and on to individual European and American artists, he traces the artist's "struggle between the canonical and the innovatory," the swing between elaboration and simplicity, and the contrast and overlap of religious and secular, public and private art, discussing with great expertise painting, sculpture, architecture, gardening, and modern commercial art. A traditionalist, Johnson nonetheless loves resurrecting forgotten and overlooked individuals and movements and making provocative pronouncements, and however debatable select assertions may be, this volume is thrilling in its scope, fluency, and zest.
Donna Seaman
Book Dimension
length: (cm)25.9 width:(cm)19
评分
评分
评分
评分
这部书的封面设计着实引人注目,色彩搭配大胆而富有张力,那几笔看似随意的笔触,却蕴含着某种深邃的哲思,让人忍不住想一探究竟。光是盯着它看,就能感受到一种原始的冲动,仿佛有什么重要的东西正试图穿透纸张的阻隔,直抵读者的内心。我原本以为这是一本探讨某种特定流派艺术史的专著,带着一丝学术性的期待翻开扉页,然而接下来的阅读体验,却完全出乎我的预料,构成了一场关于“感知边界”的奇特冒险。作者似乎并不热衷于梳理清晰的脉络或提供确凿的定义,相反,他更像是一个引导者,将我们带入一片由光影、材质和瞬间情绪构筑的迷宫。书中的段落结构极为破碎,常常在描绘一个极其细腻的触觉感受后,戛然而止,留下长长的空白,让人不得不自行填补那些未言明的意象。我记得有一章专门讨论了“失焦的轮廓”——它并非对图像清晰度的技术性分析,而更像是一种对记忆如何扭曲现实的隐喻。读完那一节,我甚至开始怀疑自己对日常生活中所见事物的确定性。这感觉很奇妙,它迫使你放慢呼吸,去注意那些平日里被大脑自动忽略的微小细节,比如清晨阳光穿过百叶窗投射在地板上的阴影边缘是如何随着时间缓缓移动的。这本书挑战了我们对“阅读”本身的期待,它更像是一场沉浸式的、需要主动参与的感官体验,而不是被动接受信息的文本。
评分从整体的阅读感受来看,这本书更像是一次对“过程”的赞美,而非对“结果”的总结。作者似乎对最终的“作品”本身兴趣寥寥,他真正着迷的是创作过程中那种介于清晰与混沌之间的过渡状态。书中有大量的篇幅似乎都在讨论“停顿”、“犹豫”和“撤回”这些在传统创作叙事中通常被省略的环节。这让我意识到,艺术的本质可能并不在于那个被展示出来的成品,而在于艺术家在面对无限可能性时所做出的那些艰难的、甚至是错误的取舍。书中对材料的描述也极为细致,但这种细致并非炫耀技艺,而是为了揭示材料本身的“意志”——即材料如何反作用于创作者的意图,如何通过自身的物理特性来引导最终的形态。我体会到一种强烈的共鸣:许多时候,我们越是想控制,事物就越是偏离预期,而当我们学会顺应和利用这种偏离时,反而能达到更令人惊喜的效果。阅读完毕后,我并没有获得一个“标准答案”或者“明确的结论”,而是获得了一种更开放、更宽容的态度去面对生活中的不确定性,以及对自己思考过程的认可。这本书成功地将一种抽象的哲学探讨,落实到了对具体物质世界的敏锐感知中,是一次非常独特且令人回味的智力冒险。
评分我花了相当长的时间才适应这本书的叙事结构——它几乎没有传统的章节划分,更像是一系列高度浓缩的笔记、随笔和未完成的草稿的集合。初次阅读时,我感到有些迷失方向,就像站在一个巨大的博物馆中央,没有地图指引,只能凭直觉走向任何一个引起我好奇的展柜。这种非线性的编排方式,非但没有削弱信息的有效性,反而通过不断的跳转和关联,在读者的大脑中构建起了一个复杂的、多维度的思维网络。作者非常擅长运用类比和跨界参照,比如他可能上一页还在讨论某种建筑材料的耐久性,下一页就将其比喻为人类情感的脆弱性,这种跳跃性思维,迫使你不断地在不同的知识领域之间建立联系。这绝不是一本可以用来快速浏览的书籍,它需要你反复咀嚼,甚至需要你停下来,关闭书页,进行一段冥想式的思考。我个人采取的策略是,每读完一个似乎有关联的小片段,就立刻在旁边空白处写下自己的联想,将“作者的思考”与“我的理解”进行实时碰撞。这种深度的互动,让阅读体验从被动的接受者,转变为主动的合作者。这种处理方式非常考验读者的专注力和心智的开放程度,对于习惯了清晰逻辑链条的读者来说,可能需要一点时间来适应这种“思维的漫游”。
评分这本书的语言风格,如果用一个词来形容,那一定是“克制而又爆发性”的。它不像某些评论那样用华丽的辞藻堆砌出某种高高在上的姿态,反而采取了一种近乎冷静的、近距离的观察视角,仿佛作者正拿着放大镜,贴在事物的表面进行细致入微的探究。然而,就在这种表面的冷静之下,却潜藏着一股暗流,当作者捕捉到一个精准而又极具穿透力的词汇时,那种冲击力是陡然爆发的。例如,他描述一件看似静止的雕塑时,用了“时间被冻结在金属的褶皱里”这样极富画面感的表达,一下子就让这件作品获得了动态的生命力。这种文字的运用,使得阅读过程充满了节奏上的起伏跌宕。更令人称道的是,作者对于“失败”或“不完美”的接纳态度。书中似乎有意无意地回避了对“杰作”的歌颂,反而将更多的笔墨倾注于那些被边缘化、被遗忘的作品碎片,或是那些创作过程中必然出现的“错误”。通过这种聚焦,作者成功地构建了一种新的审美范畴,即美并非永恒的完美,而恰恰存在于那些转瞬即逝的、带有瑕疵的瞬间之中。读完整本书,我感觉自己的审美阈值被拓宽了许多,不再拘泥于传统的评判标准,学会了欣赏那些带着“不确定性”的美感。
评分这本书在探讨“观看”这个行为时,展现出了一种近乎偏执的深度。作者似乎对我们如何接收外部信息这件事抱有极大的怀疑和探索欲。他探讨的不是“看什么”,而是“如何看”——以及“为什么我们习惯于那样去看”。书中多次引用了早期光学实验的描述,但目的绝非科普,而是用科学原理来解构我们习以为常的视觉习惯。最让我印象深刻的是关于“边缘视野”的论述,作者指出,我们日常的关注点往往集中在画面的中心焦点上,而那些在周边模糊区域发生的事情,却往往蕴含着更真实、更本能的反应信息。他鼓励读者去“斜视”这个世界,去捕捉那些不被主流目光所青睐的细节。这种视角上的转换,对我的生活产生了微妙的影响。比如,在城市街头行走时,我开始有意识地去关注建筑物的侧面、阴影的深处,而非仅仅是引人注目的招牌。这种训练不仅仅局限于视觉,它延伸到对他人言语的理解——不去只听对方最响亮的那句话,而是去捕捉语气中的停顿和犹豫。这本书与其说是一本关于特定主题的探讨,不如说是一本关于“重塑感官工具箱”的实用指南,虽然它使用的语言充满了诗意和哲学色彩。
评分按主题分类
评分按主题分类
评分按主题分类
评分按主题分类
评分按主题分类
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有