Why do some democratic governments succeed and others fail? In a book that has received attention from policymakers and civic activists in America and around the world, Robert Putnam and his collaborators offer empirical evidence for the importance of "civic community" in developing successful institutions. Their focus is on a unique experiment begun in 1970 when Italy created new governments for each of its regions. After spending two decades analyzing the efficacy of these governments in such fields as agriculture, housing, and health services, they reveal patterns of associationism, trust, and cooperation that facilitate good governance and economic prosperity.
Robert D. Putnam is the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at Harvard, where he teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. Professor Putnam is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the British Academy, and past president of the American Political Science Association. In 2006, Putnam received the Skytte Prize, one of the world's highest accolades for a political scientist. Raised in a small town in the Midwest and educated at Swarthmore, Oxford, and Yale, he has served as Dean of the Kennedy School of Government.
He has written fourteen books, translated into twenty languages, including the best-selling Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, and more recently Better Together: Restoring the American Community, a study of promising new forms of social connectedness. His previous book, Making Democracy Work, was praised by the Economist as "a great work of social science, worthy to rank alongside de Tocqueville, Pareto and Weber." Both Making Democracy Work and Bowling Alone are among the most cited publications in the social sciences worldwide in the last half century.
今天看完了从政治学角度研究社会资本问题的名著---《使民主运转起来》,感觉还不错,不光大量的调查资料让人敬佩和信服,但就对问题的分析来说也是非常精辟的。这本书虽然翻译的不是很好,但还是非常容易理解的,得出的结论也很有说服力。本书的缘起是作者抓住意大利开始地...
評分 評分 評分 評分great thoughts. However, Putnam didn't rule out the possibility that the prevalence of civic associations in Northern Italy is not as the result of the region's better economic conditions.
评分此書明明是三人閤作,被記得的似乎卻隻有帕特南,所以舞颱還是很重要。從政治學的視角看來,立論和結構都很清楚,也富有啓發性。但是,總讓人覺得頗有循環論證的感覺——或者說,總給人感覺好的地方什麼都好,壞的地方什麼都壞。總之,覺得社會資本和民主運轉之間的相關關係肯定存在,但是因果關係究竟如何,則還需進一步仔細討論。
评分此書明明是三人閤作,被記得的似乎卻隻有帕特南,所以舞颱還是很重要。從政治學的視角看來,立論和結構都很清楚,也富有啓發性。但是,總讓人覺得頗有循環論證的感覺——或者說,總給人感覺好的地方什麼都好,壞的地方什麼都壞。總之,覺得社會資本和民主運轉之間的相關關係肯定存在,但是因果關係究竟如何,則還需進一步仔細討論。
评分# 如果不是對civic tradition感興趣,這本書可以花三個小時就讀完。經驗材料的編排以當時的標準來看算精細,但是給人感覺是硬套上去的,講曆史淵源沒寫齣活潑勁兒來。這本書還是比較少強調civic tradition對於發展和民主起作用的conditionality,不過civic tradition的幾個要點,平等、包容、替彆人考慮等等,確實就是民主得以運轉的關鍵。現代社會不一定意味著community到society,作者試圖說明在現代社會裏可以建立基於自由平等關係的community。我很喜歡這個理想,今後可以自稱communitarian liberals,哈哈。
评分1 4 6
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有