Making Democracy Work pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026
- 政治学
- democracy
- 社会学
- 政治
- politics
- CivilSociety
- 比较政治
- social-capital
- 民主
- 治理
- 政治
- 制度
- 参与
- 公民
- 权力
- 透明
- 问责
- 改革
具体描述
Why do some democratic governments succeed and others fail? In a book that has received attention from policymakers and civic activists in America and around the world, Robert Putnam and his collaborators offer empirical evidence for the importance of "civic community" in developing successful institutions. Their focus is on a unique experiment begun in 1970 when Italy created new governments for each of its regions. After spending two decades analyzing the efficacy of these governments in such fields as agriculture, housing, and health services, they reveal patterns of associationism, trust, and cooperation that facilitate good governance and economic prosperity.
作者简介
Robert D. Putnam is the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at Harvard, where he teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. Professor Putnam is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the British Academy, and past president of the American Political Science Association. In 2006, Putnam received the Skytte Prize, one of the world's highest accolades for a political scientist. Raised in a small town in the Midwest and educated at Swarthmore, Oxford, and Yale, he has served as Dean of the Kennedy School of Government.
He has written fourteen books, translated into twenty languages, including the best-selling Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, and more recently Better Together: Restoring the American Community, a study of promising new forms of social connectedness. His previous book, Making Democracy Work, was praised by the Economist as "a great work of social science, worthy to rank alongside de Tocqueville, Pareto and Weber." Both Making Democracy Work and Bowling Alone are among the most cited publications in the social sciences worldwide in the last half century.
目录信息
读后感
从政治制度的变革入手，考察意大利各地区制度绩效，发现南北差异，导入公民性、公民性研究，追溯中世纪历史，城市共和国遗产作用远大于其他因素。首倡政治发展中的社会资本研究。规范与实证研究功力相当。
评分从政治制度的变革入手，考察意大利各地区制度绩效，发现南北差异，导入公民性、公民性研究，追溯中世纪历史，城市共和国遗产作用远大于其他因素。首倡政治发展中的社会资本研究。规范与实证研究功力相当。
评分 评分1970年，意大利开始实施一项制度改革，将中央政府手中的权力下放到地区政府。作者借由这个契机进行了一段长达20多年的研究，以期确定地区自治制度究竟是否能有所成效。 研究结果展现了一系列耐人寻味的事实： 首先，人们在政治主张上趋向于中间派，不可调和的冲突大幅下降。 其...
评分用户评价
great thoughts. However, Putnam didn't rule out the possibility that the prevalence of civic associations in Northern Italy is not as the result of the region's better economic conditions.
评分从视野格局和经验材料上讲堪称完美。唯一有一个不太对劲之处是微观的机制和宏观的相关之间的联系似乎论证得不够强。微观的社会资本和微观的合作之间的因果机制很清楚，宏观的地区civic tradition和地区治理效率之间的相关也很清楚，但是小的association的作用如何传导到宏观的民主化呢？public-spiritedness&egalitarian value spawned by networks of civic engagement大概是传导带，可是具体怎么传导的没有详细说明。不过当然开创性作品也不能把事情都做完了……
评分不管其他书理论还是写作有多难，这本是本学期折磨我最严酷的书T_T，星期六到星期天连续十多个小时边度边做笔记，分析数据。
评分去年被要求看的书（太长+数据太多=不看）今年刷了几个书评了事。关于社会资本不同导致同样下放权利到南北意大利不同地方政府，皿煮运转的不同。好像放到我国做实验也会是差不多的结果嘛，把南北对调一下，我国南北经济意识各方面都跟意大利南北是反的。
评分writing style is perfect. it's about the decentralization of Italian gov. I didn't know that Italy has so various subcultural groups.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有