Making Democracy Work pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
- 政治学
- democracy
- 社会学
- 政治
- politics
- CivilSociety
- 比较政治
- social-capital
- 民主
- 治理
- 政治
- 制度
- 参与
- 公民
- 权力
- 透明
- 问责
- 改革
具体描述
Why do some democratic governments succeed and others fail? In a book that has received attention from policymakers and civic activists in America and around the world, Robert Putnam and his collaborators offer empirical evidence for the importance of "civic community" in developing successful institutions. Their focus is on a unique experiment begun in 1970 when Italy created new governments for each of its regions. After spending two decades analyzing the efficacy of these governments in such fields as agriculture, housing, and health services, they reveal patterns of associationism, trust, and cooperation that facilitate good governance and economic prosperity.
作者简介
Robert D. Putnam is the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at Harvard, where he teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. Professor Putnam is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the British Academy, and past president of the American Political Science Association. In 2006, Putnam received the Skytte Prize, one of the world's highest accolades for a political scientist. Raised in a small town in the Midwest and educated at Swarthmore, Oxford, and Yale, he has served as Dean of the Kennedy School of Government.
He has written fourteen books, translated into twenty languages, including the best-selling Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, and more recently Better Together: Restoring the American Community, a study of promising new forms of social connectedness. His previous book, Making Democracy Work, was praised by the Economist as "a great work of social science, worthy to rank alongside de Tocqueville, Pareto and Weber." Both Making Democracy Work and Bowling Alone are among the most cited publications in the social sciences worldwide in the last half century.
目录信息
读后感
帕特南作为有名的政治学家，对于“公民社会”“公民参与”这样的话题是情有独钟的。他的《独自打保龄球》就描绘出美国人对于他们一向热衷的保龄球这样的社团活动的热情似乎正在下降了。人与人横向关系的疏远一定程度上动摇了稳固的社会资本，对于以此为基石的美国共和民主政治...
评分 评分从政治制度的变革入手，考察意大利各地区制度绩效，发现南北差异，导入公民性、公民性研究，追溯中世纪历史，城市共和国遗产作用远大于其他因素。首倡政治发展中的社会资本研究。规范与实证研究功力相当。
评分间接地在月之仙者的推荐下，我看了帕特南的《使民主运转起来》。这本书让我更加感受到西方学者对学术问题单纯地追求，没有华丽文字的堆砌，没有炫耀，有的是实在的思考着的文字跃然纸上。 这本著作建立在作者20年的实地考察基础之上，解决的是制度创新与路劲依赖的辩证关系。意...
评分Web 2.0与民主绩效 ---读帕特南《使民主运转起来》有感 刚看到书名“使民主运转起来”的时候就有点不太明白，看完才知道民主运转讲得是民主绩效，换种说法，即按书中所说一个好的民主的政府不仅需要考虑它的公民的需求（即，回应性），而且要对这...
用户评价
Wondering how comparative politics research has descended into downright mediocrity from there.
评分从视野格局和经验材料上讲堪称完美。唯一有一个不太对劲之处是微观的机制和宏观的相关之间的联系似乎论证得不够强。微观的社会资本和微观的合作之间的因果机制很清楚，宏观的地区civic tradition和地区治理效率之间的相关也很清楚，但是小的association的作用如何传导到宏观的民主化呢？public-spiritedness&egalitarian value spawned by networks of civic engagement大概是传导带，可是具体怎么传导的没有详细说明。不过当然开创性作品也不能把事情都做完了……
评分因研究civic society细细读了两天。研究political culture的经典范本，讨论civic traditions对institutional performance的作用，理论格局和实证的对接做的很好，但似乎并没有排除economic development对civic associations的影响，最后落回到communitarianism时也不能论证liberalism就不会带来civic bonds.
评分研究信任、互惠原则和横向关系网络对institution performance的作用。应该可以理解为“民主运作”的道德基础吧
评分看着都这么累 真研究起来得有多烦
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有