Why do some democratic governments succeed and others fail? In a book that has received attention from policymakers and civic activists in America and around the world, Robert Putnam and his collaborators offer empirical evidence for the importance of "civic community" in developing successful institutions. Their focus is on a unique experiment begun in 1970 when Italy created new governments for each of its regions. After spending two decades analyzing the efficacy of these governments in such fields as agriculture, housing, and health services, they reveal patterns of associationism, trust, and cooperation that facilitate good governance and economic prosperity.
Robert D. Putnam is the Peter and Isabel Malkin Professor of Public Policy at Harvard, where he teaches both undergraduate and graduate courses. Professor Putnam is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, a Fellow of the British Academy, and past president of the American Political Science Association. In 2006, Putnam received the Skytte Prize, one of the world's highest accolades for a political scientist. Raised in a small town in the Midwest and educated at Swarthmore, Oxford, and Yale, he has served as Dean of the Kennedy School of Government.
He has written fourteen books, translated into twenty languages, including the best-selling Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, and more recently Better Together: Restoring the American Community, a study of promising new forms of social connectedness. His previous book, Making Democracy Work, was praised by the Economist as "a great work of social science, worthy to rank alongside de Tocqueville, Pareto and Weber." Both Making Democracy Work and Bowling Alone are among the most cited publications in the social sciences worldwide in the last half century.
帕特南作为有名的政治学家,对于“公民社会”“公民参与”这样的话题是情有独钟的。他的《独自打保龄球》就描绘出美国人对于他们一向热衷的保龄球这样的社团活动的热情似乎正在下降了。人与人横向关系的疏远一定程度上动摇了稳固的社会资本,对于以此为基石的美国共和民主政治...
评分Web 2.0与民主绩效 ---读帕特南《使民主运转起来》有感 刚看到书名“使民主运转起来”的时候就有点不太明白,看完才知道民主运转讲得是民主绩效,换种说法,即按书中所说一个好的民主的政府不仅需要考虑它的公民的需求(即,回应性),而且要对这...
Wondering how comparative politics research has descended into downright mediocrity from there.
评分methodological innovation; explanatory variable, civic community; subnational variation; historical legacy; yet, not necessarily make democracy work, but make institutions work, create a responsive and effective institution.
评分此书明明是三人合作,被记得的似乎却只有帕特南,所以舞台还是很重要。从政治学的视角看来,立论和结构都很清楚,也富有启发性。但是,总让人觉得颇有循环论证的感觉——或者说,总给人感觉好的地方什么都好,坏的地方什么都坏。总之,觉得社会资本和民主运转之间的相关关系肯定存在,但是因果关系究竟如何,则还需进一步仔细讨论。
评分去年被要求看的书(太长+数据太多=不看)今年刷了几个书评了事。关于社会资本不同导致同样下放权利到南北意大利不同地方政府,皿煮运转的不同。好像放到我国做实验也会是差不多的结果嘛,把南北对调一下,我国南北经济意识各方面都跟意大利南北是反的。
评分The founding father of social capital.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有