Weapons of the Weak is an ethnography by James C. Scott that studies the effects of the Green Revolution in rural Malaysia. One of the main objectives of the study is to make an argument that the Marxian and Gramscian ideas of false consciousness and hegemony are incorrect. He develops this conclusion throughout the book, through the different scenarios and characters that come up during his time of fieldwork in the village. This publication, based on 2 years of fieldwork (1978-1980), focuses on the local class relations in a small rice farming community of 70 households in the main paddy-growing area of Kedah in Malaysia. Introduction of the Green Revolution in 1976 eliminated 2/3 of the wage-earning opportunities for smallholders and landless laborers. The main ensuing class struggle is analyzed being the ideological struggle in the village and the practice of resistance itself consisting of: foot-dragging, dissimulation, desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance and sabotage acts. Rich and poor are engaged in an unremitting if silent struggle to define changes in land tenure, mechanization and employment to advance their own interests, and to use values that they share to control the distribution of status, land, work and grain.
James C. Scott is the Sterling Professor of Political Science, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrariane, professor of anthropology, and codirector of the Agrarian Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seei Studies Program at Yale University. His books include "Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Cong Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistancendition Have Failed"; "Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Be: Hidden Transcripts"; and most recently, "The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia.ing Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia." He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Science" He is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper. s and a mediocre part-time farmer and beekeeper.
這本書講的是東南亞農業社會,讓我聯想到的是工業社會。在從農業文明走向工業文明的過程中,中國的日常管理者們很多時候都要面對書中所述的Negative dynamics:“農民(或民工)利用心照不宣的理解和非正式的網絡,不需要事先協調和計劃,以低姿態的反抗技術進行自衞性的消耗戰...
评分黑格尔说,“密涅瓦的猫头鹰只在黄昏时飞翔”,下层阶级的亚文化,虽然表面看起来恭顺平静,但其实遵从和愚钝只是一种姿态,共谋的沉默和隐藏的文本,才是背后深思熟虑的理性建构,弱者也有自己的武器。作者深入马来西亚赛达卡水稻种植区的村落中,探讨贫穷农民对抗富人的种种...
评分1、“弱者”是指什么? 马来西亚赛达卡村庄的穷人。 2、弱者的“武器”是什么? 实际上指的是赛达卡村庄农民反抗的日常形式。包括偷懒、装糊涂、开小差、假装顺从、偷懒、装疯卖傻、诽谤、纵火、暗中破坏等。农民的日常反抗可以适用于阶级分析法吗?在作者看来,似乎不...
评分在《弱者的武器》中斯科特讨论村庄政治,农民作为弱势群体在社会中处于边缘地位,但这种边缘地位并非专属于农民,在城市中也存在着这样很大一圈这样的人。 读大学时和好朋友经常会在一起聊天,我们一个来自西部的三线城市一个来自西部农村,但都在一线城市读书,每天穿...
评分学者的本事就是:能把一个用一句话能说明的道理,扩展成一部厚厚的大书。也许我对学术不够理解,学术的精妙不仅在于观点,还在于让人信服的论述过程。 本书撇开了宏大的农民革命视角,将焦点对准农民日常生活中琐碎、持久的抵抗形式,符合人类学家的做派。此外,...
每次上来豆瓣找书评的时候,是我对中国的未来最有希望的时候,简直是热泪盈眶。
评分每次看这本书我的脑子像是被台风扫荡过一样只剩下两个内容:“James Scott文笔真好”、“哇在马来西亚乡下待三年,好酷哟~”【主要是everyday resistance实在太trivial了,虽然是个有趣的课题,但讲真没啥好研究的】
评分每次看这本书我的脑子像是被台风扫荡过一样只剩下两个内容:“James Scott文笔真好”、“哇在马来西亚乡下待三年,好酷哟~”【主要是everyday resistance实在太trivial了,虽然是个有趣的课题,但讲真没啥好研究的】
评分每次上来豆瓣找书评的时候,是我对中国的未来最有希望的时候,简直是热泪盈眶。
评分很粗略的过了中文版,因为距离课堂讨论的DDL只有一天了。英文版大致翻了下,好写response。好在对于斯科特在中国的衍生品还算熟悉,总算能交差。不过这次的讨论主要围绕政治学学者如何用semiotic practice的方法,如何理解文化这种dialetical relationship between practices and systems of significations, 以及民族志调查与社会科学所要求的parsimonious, general的理论之间的对接。趁着写response, 又重新梳理了下近几年中外对于土改、集体化的口述史研究,感觉清晰了一点。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有