The creation of the Frankfurt School of critical theory in the 1920s saw the birth of some of the most exciting and challenging writings of the twentieth century. It is out of this background that the great critic Theodor Adorno emerged. His finest essays are collected here, offering the reader unparalleled insights into Adorno's thoughts on culture. He argued that the culture industry commodified and standardized all art. In turn this suffocated individuality and destroyed critical thinking. At the time, Adorno was accused of everything from overreaction to deranged hysteria by his many detractors. In today's world, where even the least cynical of consumers is aware of the influence of the media, Adorno's work takes on a more immediate significance. The Culture Industry is an unrivalled indictment of the banality of mass culture.
具体描述
读后感
法蘭克福學派對資本主義社會的批判向來毫不留情，其中又以阿多諾(Theodor Adorno)和霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)最不遺餘力，兩人合著《啟蒙的辯證》(Dialectic of Enlightenment)，批判啟蒙精神的哲學思維與框架及當代文化現狀，之後還一起修改書中論文成《再論文化工業》(Cultur...
评分法蘭克福學派對資本主義社會的批判向來毫不留情，其中又以阿多諾(Theodor Adorno)和霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)最不遺餘力，兩人合著《啟蒙的辯證》(Dialectic of Enlightenment)，批判啟蒙精神的哲學思維與框架及當代文化現狀，之後還一起修改書中論文成《再論文化工業》(Cultur...
评分法蘭克福學派對資本主義社會的批判向來毫不留情，其中又以阿多諾(Theodor Adorno)和霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)最不遺餘力，兩人合著《啟蒙的辯證》(Dialectic of Enlightenment)，批判啟蒙精神的哲學思維與框架及當代文化現狀，之後還一起修改書中論文成《再論文化工業》(Cultur...
评分法蘭克福學派對資本主義社會的批判向來毫不留情，其中又以阿多諾(Theodor Adorno)和霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)最不遺餘力，兩人合著《啟蒙的辯證》(Dialectic of Enlightenment)，批判啟蒙精神的哲學思維與框架及當代文化現狀，之後還一起修改書中論文成《再論文化工業》(Cultur...
评分法蘭克福學派對資本主義社會的批判向來毫不留情，其中又以阿多諾(Theodor Adorno)和霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)最不遺餘力，兩人合著《啟蒙的辯證》(Dialectic of Enlightenment)，批判啟蒙精神的哲學思維與框架及當代文化現狀，之後還一起修改書中論文成《再論文化工業》(Cultur...
用户评价
It's a compulsory reading for those who study media and culutre.
评分这帮人真的和希特勒没亲戚么……虽然被整……
评分标上好了，读了前一半。。很有启发，什么是文化工业以及真正的艺术。
评分很多启发，其中包含对个人思想启蒙的认可。需要一读再读
评分很多启发，其中包含对个人思想启蒙的认可。需要一读再读
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有