肯尼思·弗蘭姆普敦,是哥倫比亞大學的維爾講席教授(WareProfessor),曾有許多建築理論曆史方麵的著作問世。原書由格拉漢姆高等藝術研究基金會(Graham Foundatlon for Advanced Studiesinthe Fine Arts)和麻省理工學院齣版社聯閤齣版。
Kenneth Frampton's long-awaited follow-up to his classic A Critical History of Modern Architecture is certain to influence any future debate on the evolution of modern architecture.Studies in Tectonic Culture is nothing less than a rethinking of the entire modern architectural tradition. The notion of tectonics as employed by Frampton -- the focus on architecture as a constructional craft -- constitutes a direct challenge to current mainstream thinking on the artistic limits of postmodernism, and suggests a convincing alternative. Indeed, Frampton argues, modern architecture is invariably as much about structure and construction as it is about space and abstract form.Composed of ten essays and an epilogue that trace the history of contemporary form as an evolving poetic of structure and construction, the book's analytical framework rests on Frampton's close readings of key French and German, and English sources from the eighteenth century to the present. He clarifies the various turns that structural engineering and tectonic imagination have taken in the work of such architects as Perret, Wright, Kahn, Scarpa, and Mies, and shows how both constructional form and material character were integral to an evolving architectural expression of their work. Frampton also demonstrates that the way in which these elements are articulated from one work to the next provides a basis upon which to evaluate the works as a whole. This is especially evident in his consideration of the work of Perret, Mies, and Kahn and the continuities in their thought and attitudes that linked them to the past.Frampton considers the conscious cultivation of the tectonic tradition in architecture as an essential element in the future development of architectural form, casting a critical new light on the entire issue of modernity and on the place of much work that has passed as "avant-garde."A copublication of the Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies and The MIT Press.
1.希腊-哥特理想的核心目的是什么(寻找新的建筑语汇or通过结构表达空间和建筑or?) 2.建构能不能被理解是为通过哲学(二分对立、宇空概念etc)来理解受力关系和细部节点?建构的本质是隐喻?construction+construing? 3.词源学上的木构(tectonic)和建构(tectonic)之间的...
評分建构的逻辑性与建筑表皮化在这里看来是建筑表现的一对矛盾(看来需要阅读关于表皮化的理论学说,可能并非完全不能调和);建筑常常被称为“工程与技术的结合”,精湛的工程本身是否即是一种艺术,或者为了表达出艺术之美,而调动工程技术来实现?个人认为书里倾向于以建筑...
評分哥大有人推荐我说 这个书翻得很好 看了这次markus peter的skript,深刻质疑这个说法。自然很多地方是原文不懂去看王老师的翻译,比如 stereometrie作砌筑解,但仍感到许多看德语high到不行的地方,看中文全没感觉的情况。 误读不是不好,文字本身只是传递的...
評分哥大有人推荐我说 这个书翻得很好 看了这次markus peter的skript,深刻质疑这个说法。自然很多地方是原文不懂去看王老师的翻译,比如 stereometrie作砌筑解,但仍感到许多看德语high到不行的地方,看中文全没感觉的情况。 误读不是不好,文字本身只是传递的...
評分作业,直接复制过来了 1不得不说于我而言读这本书的体验就像是一次被一头脱缰的野马拽着在建筑理论的茫茫原野上的狂奔。硬啃下来虽然开始对各种形而上的建筑名词开始稍微有了一点概念,但正如叔本华所说的相对健康的学习状态是从直接经验经过抽象形成概念的自然过程而不是概念...
隻讀瞭斯卡帕的一部分就被彆人request走瞭嗚嗚
评分建築學何去何從,這是個問題
评分嘩,原著呢
评分這本中英文搭著來的~~晦澀。。。。誰能好好給我講清楚建構到底是什麼,糊塗死瞭。。。
评分建築學何去何從,這是個問題
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有