While social scientists and historians have been exchanging ideas for a long time, they have never developed a proper dialogue about social theory. William H. Sewell Jr. observes that on questions of theory the communication has been mostly one way: from social science to history. Logics of History argues that both history and the social sciences have something crucial to offer each other. While historians do not think of themselves as theorists, they know something social scientists do not: how to think about the temporalities of social life. On the other hand, while social scientists’ treatments of temporality are usually clumsy, their theoretical sophistication and penchant for structural accounts of social life could offer much to historians.
Renowned for his work at the crossroads of history, sociology, political science, and anthropology, Sewell argues that only by combining a more sophisticated understanding of historical time with a concern for larger theoretical questions can a satisfying social theory emerge. In Logics of History, he reveals the shape such an engagement could take, some of the topics it could illuminate, and how it might affect both sides of the disciplinary divide.
William H. Sewell Jr. is the Frank P. Hixon Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and History at the University of Chicago. He is the author of three previous books, including Work and Revolution in France and A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution.
看到mujun这么评论这本书:Sewell对于文化、社会、事件、结构等概念的理解一脉相承。弄明白一个基本也就搞清楚他的思路了。他并不是要给这些概念再提出一套自己的理论,只是要为那些想把“文化”和“社会史”写到一起去,想把“结构”和“行动”写到一起去的人提供一套切实可行...
評分看到mujun这么评论这本书:Sewell对于文化、社会、事件、结构等概念的理解一脉相承。弄明白一个基本也就搞清楚他的思路了。他并不是要给这些概念再提出一套自己的理论,只是要为那些想把“文化”和“社会史”写到一起去,想把“结构”和“行动”写到一起去的人提供一套切实可行...
評分除了吐槽之外,我还是再写点正经的吧。 ff老师说这本书对于她的启发在于,要去寻找历史事件发生背后的结构。刚才看到笔记人老师说,这本书对于他的意义主要在于,历史学家能从人类学家那里学到什么。但对我来说,这本书的价值在于给那些通过不同的途径生产出来的知识找一个各...
評分除了吐槽之外,我还是再写点正经的吧。 ff老师说这本书对于她的启发在于,要去寻找历史事件发生背后的结构。刚才看到笔记人老师说,这本书对于他的意义主要在于,历史学家能从人类学家那里学到什么。但对我来说,这本书的价值在于给那些通过不同的途径生产出来的知识找一个各...
評分除了吐槽之外,我还是再写点正经的吧。 ff老师说这本书对于她的启发在于,要去寻找历史事件发生背后的结构。刚才看到笔记人老师说,这本书对于他的意义主要在于,历史学家能从人类学家那里学到什么。但对我来说,这本书的价值在于给那些通过不同的途径生产出来的知识找一个各...
Chapter 3,4,5,6
评分Eventful sociology. Contingent event The world is under no obligation to confirm to the logic by which some people conceive of it.- Marshall Sahlins. Event, structure,cultural transformation and social change.Social construction.--Hermeneutical quantification--(Description--Explanation--Interpretation.) Not language, semiotic,Not articulation.
评分“...a reality previously represented by such religious concepts as Divine Will or Providence”成瞭“過去由諸如神意和天道這類宗教概念主宰的人類身處的現實”@@不得不說,兩個譯者討巧得很……可能要很久纔讀得“完”……不“讀過”就會永遠在讀瞭……
评分曆史社會學:結構的崩潰與轉型。結構與能動性相互構成,結構的縫隙帶來市民社會能動性的可能,集體的能動性則帶來結構的變革。
评分嗯,讀瞭部分。好書。特彆是針對那些讀過人類學、社會學中各類理論與民族誌的人,針對那些對曆史學紛爭的人,針對建築史中類似事件和結構不斷糾纏的人,此書算是給齣瞭很好的梳理與點評。最終的立場或是方嚮或許真就沒有作者的整理那麼重要。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有