Logics of History pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
- 曆史
- 社會學
- 曆史社會學
- 曆史哲學
- Sewell
- 史學理論
- 人類學
- history
- 曆史哲學
- 邏輯分析
- 社會變遷
- 因果關係
- 曆史進程
- 理論建構
- 結構主義
- 曆史解釋
- 時間維度
- 認知框架
具體描述
While social scientists and historians have been exchanging ideas for a long time, they have never developed a proper dialogue about social theory. William H. Sewell Jr. observes that on questions of theory the communication has been mostly one way: from social science to history. Logics of History argues that both history and the social sciences have something crucial to offer each other. While historians do not think of themselves as theorists, they know something social scientists do not: how to think about the temporalities of social life. On the other hand, while social scientists’ treatments of temporality are usually clumsy, their theoretical sophistication and penchant for structural accounts of social life could offer much to historians.
Renowned for his work at the crossroads of history, sociology, political science, and anthropology, Sewell argues that only by combining a more sophisticated understanding of historical time with a concern for larger theoretical questions can a satisfying social theory emerge. In Logics of History, he reveals the shape such an engagement could take, some of the topics it could illuminate, and how it might affect both sides of the disciplinary divide.
著者簡介
William H. Sewell Jr. is the Frank P. Hixon Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science and History at the University of Chicago. He is the author of three previous books, including Work and Revolution in France and A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution.
圖書目錄
讀後感
我一开始对社会学产生极大的兴趣——想来可能同很多其他社会学学生一样——是上本科理论课读韦伯齐美尔一摩尔经典理论家让我脑洞大开，觉得他们既能极好的勾勒出从传统社会到现代社会的变迁，又能极犀利地铺陈出对现代社会的反思和批判。这种求知的兴趣往往到了当代理论就遇到...
評分我一开始对社会学产生极大的兴趣——想来可能同很多其他社会学学生一样——是上本科理论课读韦伯齐美尔一摩尔经典理论家让我脑洞大开，觉得他们既能极好的勾勒出从传统社会到现代社会的变迁，又能极犀利地铺陈出对现代社会的反思和批判。这种求知的兴趣往往到了当代理论就遇到...
評分 評分May be summarized as follows: culture, I have argued, should be understood as a dialectic of system and practice, as a dimension of social life autonomous from other such dimensions both in its logic and in its spatial configuration, and as possessing a rea...
評分May be summarized as follows: culture, I have argued, should be understood as a dialectic of system and practice, as a dimension of social life autonomous from other such dimensions both in its logic and in its spatial configuration, and as possessing a rea...
用戶評價
真是曆史研究者必讀，雖然作者是通過挖掘某些史學研究中埋藏的閃光點來把社會學傢拉到曆史（event）那邊去，但是最該讀的還是研究曆史的人。對於中文學術世界裏麵徹底無視理論的經驗主義研究者，和鬍亂使用“結構”、"文化"這種社科詞匯有著正本清源的作用。
评分第一章簡明扼要，分析曆史學和社會科學的不同，切中要點。在historiography的課上非常值得一讀。
评分嗯，讀瞭部分。好書。特彆是針對那些讀過人類學、社會學中各類理論與民族誌的人，針對那些對曆史學紛爭的人，針對建築史中類似事件和結構不斷糾纏的人，此書算是給齣瞭很好的梳理與點評。最終的立場或是方嚮或許真就沒有作者的整理那麼重要。
评分Eventful sociology. Contingent event The world is under no obligation to confirm to the logic by which some people conceive of it.- Marshall Sahlins. Event, structure,cultural transformation and social change.Social construction.--Hermeneutical quantification--（Description--Explanation--Interpretation.） Not language, semiotic,Not articulation.
评分structure, culture, event, geo-temporality
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有