After Defeat pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Ayşe Zarakol is an Assistant Professor of Politics at Washington and Lee University. She teaches courses on global politics, international security and political theory, and her research focuses on the social evolution of the international system and the integration of regions outside of the West into the modern international order.

出版者:Cambridge University Press

作者:Dr Ayse Zarakol

出品人:

頁數:312

译者:

出版時間:2011-2-14

價格:USD 98.00

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9780521191821

叢書系列:Cambridge Studies in International Relations

圖書標籤:

國際關係
政治學
國際政治
政治史
政治
國際關係理論
國關理論
曆史

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Not being of the West; being behind the West; not being modern enough; not being developed or industrialized, secular, civilized, Christian, transparent, or democratic - these descriptions have all served to stigmatize certain states through history. Drawing on constructivism as well as the insights of social theorists and philosophers, After Defeat, first published in 2010, demonstrates that stigmatization in international relations can lead to a sense of national shame, as well as auto-Orientalism and inferior status. Ayse Zarakol argues that stigmatized states become extra-sensitive to concerns about status, and shape their foreign policy accordingly. The theoretical argument is supported by a detailed historical overview of central examples of the established/outsider dichotomy throughout the evolution of the modern states system, and in-depth studies of Turkey after the First World War, Japan after the Second World War, and Russia after the Cold War.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

還不自己寫本算瞭

评分☆☆☆☆☆

很早讀過的一冊國際政治的著作，坦率地來說，真的是非常難解的一冊著作。後現代主義，建構主義？的學者還可以這樣信口鬍說嗎？現在也無法抹去這樣的感覺。當然，某種程度上應當感謝作者讓我們多少知道自己算是東方主義？者的。想起來，那時候有人問我是做什麼領域的。日本政治。OK，是東亞政治？當時真是呆瞭兩秒，啊，日本政治是東亞政治2333。大概是真的自己讀書太少，日本政治研究的文獻大多是和西歐和美國政治相比較的。像Development State這個用法，大概也真的就是日本以外的學者喜歡說這是東亞模式？日本學界完全沒有這樣的自覺呢（笑），自己成瞭亞洲國傢瞭。。。。雖然說價值中立，好像確實也真的隻有這樣銳眼（笑）的建構主義學者能夠識破這種話語。嘛，的確日本和土耳其就是在東方？和西方？之間的類型2333

评分☆☆☆☆☆

【發乎情止乎情】帶著情緒/預設的研究（不確定，但intro部分對問題的引入至少會給讀者留下這個印象）（所以）totally避開瞭最應該迴答也最可能齣彩的問題↔在建構主義路徑方嚮上抬起瞭進一步的腳卻沒放下來；而且預設以及過早地引入Goffman和Elias反而分散瞭論證的重心，邏輯鏈跳步太多

评分☆☆☆☆☆