图书标签: 社会学 政治学 托克维尔 史学理论 史学 history
发表于2024-12-24
In the Workshop of History pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Those concerned with the practice of history as a discipline and as an intellectual activity will be intrigued by the view of history that Francois Furet offers in this collection of essays. After twenty-five years as a professional historian at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes and in the ranks of the Annales school, Furet sets out to reexamine the methodological and intellectual cleavages that exist today among historians.
Furet views history as a field bounded at each end by two ideal types. One end is concerned with the history of periods and with the empiricism of "facts" rather than received ideas. At the other end is problem-oriented history, which substitutes for the supposed coherence of a "period" the analytical examination of a question. Furet's own work leans toward the second, more conceptually oriented kind of historiography. The essays in this volume, most of them never before published in English, illustrate the breadth of his approach. Furet's discussion ranges through Tocqueville's conceptual system to present-day America, from the origins of history in France to the Jewish experience in the late twentieth century. Among Furet's recurrent themes is the contention that the historian constructs the object or field of his research rather than receiving it from the past.
Furet, an authority on the French Revolution and the eighteenth century, is president of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales in Paris
chapter 10——The Conceptual System of Democracy in America. pp167-196 First published as a preface to Alexis de Tocqueville, De la democratie en Amerique,1981 毕竟是DA的导论,对于整部书有一个梗概的介绍。功力深厚,法国人写的托克维尔还是跟美国人的路数不一样。更显得有历史感(毕竟傅勒是历史权威)也更多了其他学科的视角。篇章最后简要比较了马克思和托克维尔,虽然不多,但依然深刻。具体可以参见傅勒写马克思的作品。(修正史学很明显能从傅勒的论述中感觉出来)
评分chapter 10——The Conceptual System of Democracy in America. pp167-196 First published as a preface to Alexis de Tocqueville, De la democratie en Amerique,1981 毕竟是DA的导论,对于整部书有一个梗概的介绍。功力深厚,法国人写的托克维尔还是跟美国人的路数不一样。更显得有历史感(毕竟傅勒是历史权威)也更多了其他学科的视角。篇章最后简要比较了马克思和托克维尔,虽然不多,但依然深刻。具体可以参见傅勒写马克思的作品。(修正史学很明显能从傅勒的论述中感觉出来)
评分chapter 10——The Conceptual System of Democracy in America. pp167-196 First published as a preface to Alexis de Tocqueville, De la democratie en Amerique,1981 毕竟是DA的导论,对于整部书有一个梗概的介绍。功力深厚,法国人写的托克维尔还是跟美国人的路数不一样。更显得有历史感(毕竟傅勒是历史权威)也更多了其他学科的视角。篇章最后简要比较了马克思和托克维尔,虽然不多,但依然深刻。具体可以参见傅勒写马克思的作品。(修正史学很明显能从傅勒的论述中感觉出来)
评分chapter 10——The Conceptual System of Democracy in America. pp167-196 First published as a preface to Alexis de Tocqueville, De la democratie en Amerique,1981 毕竟是DA的导论,对于整部书有一个梗概的介绍。功力深厚,法国人写的托克维尔还是跟美国人的路数不一样。更显得有历史感(毕竟傅勒是历史权威)也更多了其他学科的视角。篇章最后简要比较了马克思和托克维尔,虽然不多,但依然深刻。具体可以参见傅勒写马克思的作品。(修正史学很明显能从傅勒的论述中感觉出来)
评分chapter 10——The Conceptual System of Democracy in America. pp167-196 First published as a preface to Alexis de Tocqueville, De la democratie en Amerique,1981 毕竟是DA的导论,对于整部书有一个梗概的介绍。功力深厚,法国人写的托克维尔还是跟美国人的路数不一样。更显得有历史感(毕竟傅勒是历史权威)也更多了其他学科的视角。篇章最后简要比较了马克思和托克维尔,虽然不多,但依然深刻。具体可以参见傅勒写马克思的作品。(修正史学很明显能从傅勒的论述中感觉出来)
评分
评分
评分
评分
In the Workshop of History pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024