White's Professor of Moral Philosophy in the University of Oxford.
Concerns the apparent antinomy between freedom and reason. Rationality appears to be a restraint on freedom, whereas freedom seems to be incompatible with rationality. Rejecting rationality to preserve freedom is the mark of subjectivist/emotivist theories of ethics. Rejecting freedom to emphasize rationality belongs to the naturalist/descriptivist theories. This book aims to reconcile these positions and do away with the alleged antinomy. The argument makes three main assumptions: (1) moral judgements are prescriptive; (2) they are universalizable; (3) there are genuine logical relations between prescriptive judgements. Insofar as moral judgements are universalizable, rationality gets a foothold, and their prescriptivity is intimately related to freedom to form one's own moral judgements. The first part of the book elaborates the thesis of universalizability and the connection between this feature and the fact that moral judgements have a descriptive element in addition to being prescriptive. The second and third parts expound the beginnings of a theory of moral reasoning grounded in the logic of prescriptivity and universalizability.
評分
評分
評分
評分
呈現瞭嘗試解決自由-理性兩難的主觀主義和描述主義進路。研一下讀 試著寫瞭一篇極其淺顯的書評。
评分呈現瞭嘗試解決自由-理性兩難的主觀主義和描述主義進路。研一下讀 試著寫瞭一篇極其淺顯的書評。
评分呈現瞭嘗試解決自由-理性兩難的主觀主義和描述主義進路。研一下讀 試著寫瞭一篇極其淺顯的書評。
评分呈現瞭嘗試解決自由-理性兩難的主觀主義和描述主義進路。研一下讀 試著寫瞭一篇極其淺顯的書評。
评分試圖用語言分析的方法解決倫理學問題。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有