The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

John Deigh

John Deigh is Professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of three books, The Sources of Moral Agency , Emotions, Values, and the Law , and An Introduction to Ethics. He was the editor of Ethicsfrom 1997 to 2008. David Dolinko is Professor of Law at the University of California, Los Angeles. His research interests focus on the philosophical underpinnings of criminal law. He has published articles on retributivism, capital punishment, and the privilege against self-incrimination.

Contributors:

Gerald Dworkin

L. W. Sumner

Mitchell Berman

Douglas Husak

Andrew Ashworth

Christopher Kutz

Michael Moore

John Deigh

Larry Alexander

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan

Joshua Dressler

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Ken Levy

Marcia Baron

David Dolinko

Carol Steiker

R. A. Duff

Stephen P. Garvey

出版者:OUP USA

作者:Deigh, John

出品人:

頁數:544

译者:

出版時間:2011-8

價格:$ 169.50

裝幀:

isbn號碼:9780195314854

叢書系列:Oxford Handbooks in Philosophy

圖書標籤:

牛津
刑法哲學
handbook

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

This is the first comprehensive handbook in the philosophy of criminal law. It contains seventeen original essays by leading thinkers in the field and covers the field's major topics including limits to criminalization, obscenity and hate speech, blackmail, the law of rape, attempts, accomplice liability, causation, responsibility, justification and excuse, duress, provocation and self-defense, insanity, punishment, the death penalty, mercy, and preventive detention and other alternatives to punishment. It will be an invaluable resource for scholars and students whose research and studies concern philosophical issues in criminal law and criminal law theory.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

R.A. Duff, Mercy, pp.467-492. 定義上行動和動機兩個層麵缺一不可，逐一分析刑事司法中的三種寬容：一是對正遭受痛苦（所謂“自然懲罰”）的被告人的寬容，認為可以被正當化，但是是基於身為人的美德，而非刑法體係內的價值、身為裁判者的美德；二涉及決定論，因被告人的背景因素而同情他，但無法被證成，自由刑法不應那麼深入一個人（個人覺得還是先迴答自由意誌與決定論問題）；三是在被告人悔罪的情況下寬容，Tasioulas以被告人的內部自我懲罰證成，Duff對此抱有懷疑，但個人認為可以從特殊預防的角度

评分☆☆☆☆☆