Individualist and communitarian. Anarchist and totalitarian. Classicist and romanticist. Progressive and reactionary. Since the eighteenth century, Jean-Jacques Rousseau has been said to be all of these things. Few philosophers have been the subject of as much or as intense debate, yet almost everyone agrees that Rousseau is among the most important and influential thinkers in the history of political philosophy. This new edition of his major political writings, published in the year of the three-hundredth anniversary of his birth, renews attention to the perennial importance of Rousseau’s work.
The book brings together superb new translations by renowned Rousseau scholar John T. Scott of three of Rousseau’s works: the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, the Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men, and On the Social Contract. The two discoursesshow Rousseau developing his well-known conception of the natural goodness of man and the problems posed by life in society. With the Social Contract, Rousseau became the first major thinker to argue that democracy is the only legitimate form of political organization. Scott’s extensive introduction enhances our understanding of these foundational writings, providing background information, social and historical context, and guidance for interpreting the works. Throughout, translation and editorial notes clarify ideas and terms that might not be immediately familiar to most readers.
The three works collected in The Major Political Writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau represent an important contribution to eighteenth-century political theory that has exerted an extensive influence on generations of thinkers, beginning with the leaders of the French Revolution and continuing to the present day. The new translations on offer here will be welcomed by a wide readership of both Rousseau scholars and readers with a general interest in political thought.
“John T. Scott is one of the preeminent Rousseau scholars in the world, and he exhibits his expertise here. This new translation is in every particular superb: faithful to the French, albeit not mulishly so; and stylishly readable. Indeed, I think it combines these two qualities better than any other English translation that currently exists. Also, Scott’s introduction provides a compass to navigate Rousseau’s textual waters that will help both beginner and scholar to reach shore.”—Stuart Warner, Roosevelt University
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–78) was a leading Genevan philosopher and political theorist and one of the key figures of the Enlightenment. John T. Scott is professor of political science at the University of California, Davis; he has edited or translated several volumes on Rousseau and is coauthor of The Philosopher’s Quarrel: Rousseau, Hume, and the Limits of Human Understanding.
1 孟德斯鸠主张立宪君主制,伏尔泰主张开明的君主制,而卢梭主张民 主共和制。伏尔泰虽然是一位自由主义思想家,但他不主张赶走国王。 2 我发现,所有一切问题的根子,都处在政治上。不论从什么角度看,没有哪一个国家的人民不是他们的政府的性质使他们成为什么样的人,他们就...
評分这篇书评是我对社会契约论的一个简单的思路整理和对一些比较有启示的话的思考。 知识在总是在错综复杂的关系中连通着。 1.自由: 卢梭从人的自由开始起论。“人是生而自由的,却无往不在枷锁之中,自以为是自由的主人的人,反而比其他一切更是奴隶”。 什么是自由?一个人...
評分今晚是我们这个读书小组的第一次讨论,欢迎大家来到这个小小的学术共同体。 每次过东校区看到朝气蓬勃的面孔都很激动,你们总是让我想到顾城的一句诗:“你没有 见过乌云.你的眼睛有蓝天一样的颜色。”这让我仿佛回到几年前在珠海校区与世隔绝的度假式的大一、大二生活,...
評分卢梭在《社会契约论》中用公意、主权、人民、契约、自由、平等等词语勾勒的政治哲学框架(主要是政府与政治共同体的框架)相当大程度将我们带到了一条自相矛盾的死胡同当中,对于诸多的内在矛盾和疑问很难在卢梭自己的体系里面解决,即便是某些体系内自圆其说的部分其实按照我...
評分亂入的一本書。“Discourse on the Sciences and Arts” 前半部分基本重復《胠篋》後半部分討論天纔;"不平等的起源“& Marx& Butler&Anarchism&Fromm; ”Social contract“ & war machine
评分Human societies as Rousseau portrays them in the Discourse on Inequality are riddled with dependence on men, a dependence that corrupts us and makes us unfree. In the Social Contract, Rousseau finds a form of association where we are insofar as possible dependent only on the laws of our own free choosing: self-legislative sovereignty.
评分Human societies as Rousseau portrays them in the Discourse on Inequality are riddled with dependence on men, a dependence that corrupts us and makes us unfree. In the Social Contract, Rousseau finds a form of association where we are insofar as possible dependent only on the laws of our own free choosing: self-legislative sovereignty.
评分亂入的一本書。“Discourse on the Sciences and Arts” 前半部分基本重復《胠篋》後半部分討論天纔;"不平等的起源“& Marx& Butler&Anarchism&Fromm; ”Social contract“ & war machine
评分亂入的一本書。“Discourse on the Sciences and Arts” 前半部分基本重復《胠篋》後半部分討論天纔;"不平等的起源“& Marx& Butler&Anarchism&Fromm; ”Social contract“ & war machine
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有