Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia

Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Brill Academic Pub
作者:Sara Nur Yildiz
出品人:
页数:300
译者:
出版时间:2016-3-30
价格:USD 175.00
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9789004174337
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 蒙元史
  • 蒙古史
  • 历史
  • 中亚/蒙古
  • 世界历史
  • Mongol Rule
  • Seljuk Anatolia
  • History
  • Mongol Empire
  • Anatolia
  • Military
  • Conflict
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • Culture
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

The period of Mongol rule in Anatolia, that is, roughly the century between the battle of Kösedağ in 1243 and the collapse of the Ilkhanid regime in the 1340s, if mentioned at all, is generally treated only as a brief preamble to the rise of the Ottomans. Even then, as in the nationalist histories of Russia and China, Mongol rule is seen as an unwelcome interlude that wrecked the country and left no formative traces. Rather, traditional Ottoman Turkish history arises seamlessly out of the history of the Seljuks of Rum, the principal, though latterly only notional, rulers of central Anatolia between their victory over the Byzantines at Malazgirt (Manzikert) in 1071 and their obscure demise in the early fourteenth century. By this time, one of the beyliks that was later the kernel of the Ottoman state was already in existence, among numerous others. According to Kafesoğlu, for example, this beylik ‘on the western frontier of the Seljuk state (sic), with regard to itsmoral fibre and organization, acquired many values from Seljuk Turkishness’ and ‘kept Anatolia as a Turkish motherland’. At the other end of the spectrum, comparisons have been drawn between the formation and development of the Mongol and Ottoman empires, with no reference at all to the Mongols in Anatolia.

Others have been ready to examine in more detail late thirteenth- and fourteenth-century Anatolian society, in which the Ilkhanate was the dominant power. Numismatists in particular have recently taken another look at the traditional view, and have emphasised the continuity of Ottomanfrom Ilkhanid practices. Yet here too, interest in the Mongols arises solely in connection with the circumstances in which the Ottoman state emerged. It is difficult, with hindsight, to look at the Mongol period without regard to later Turkish history.

好的,以下是一本假设的书籍简介,聚焦于突厥化进程与政治变迁,与《蒙古在塞尔柱安纳托利亚的统治》无关,内容力求详实、自然,字数约1500字: --- 拜占庭的残阳与安纳托利亚的重塑:科尼亚苏丹国治下的文化冲突与国家构建(1071-1308) 作者: [此处可插入虚构作者姓名] 出版社: [此处可插入虚构出版社名称] 导言:历史的十字路口 本书深入剖析了自曼齐刻尔特战役(1071年)后,直至奥斯曼帝国兴起前夜,安纳托利亚半岛经历的一场深刻而漫长的社会、文化与政治重塑过程。我们不再将这片土地仅仅视为东西方文明冲突的战场,而是将其视为一个复杂的熔炉,塞尔柱鲁姆苏丹国(Sultanate of Rûm)在这个熔炉中,艰难地试图从一个游牧部落的集合体,转型为一个具有持久行政能力的中古伊斯兰国家实体。 核心议题围绕着:一个新兴的、以突厥-波斯文化为基础的政治精英,如何在原有的、根深蒂固的拜占庭基督教社会结构之上,建立起有效的统治体系?苏丹国的统治基础究竟是军事征服、宗教合法性,还是对现有地方经济网络的吸纳与改造?本书拒绝采用线性的、西方中心主义的历史叙事,而是聚焦于权力、信仰与身份认同在微观层面的摩擦与融合。 第一部分:征服与治理的初态(1071-1150) 曼齐刻尔特战役不仅是一次军事胜利,它标志着拜占庭帝国在安纳托利亚的权力真空化。最初的塞尔柱突厥部落的涌入,是分散的、缺乏中央协调的。本书首先考察了苏丹国初期统治的脆弱性。 1. 地方精英的替代与共存: 初期的治理并非完全基于“征服者统治被征服者”。我们详细分析了苏丹国如何利用并部分继承了拜占庭的税收结构、地方行政工具(如“福玛”(Thema)制度的残余)以及城市中的希腊化贵族和教会阶层。许多城市(如尼西亚、以弗所等)在被占领后,其管理权杖并未立即由纯粹的突厥官员接替,而是通过一种脆弱的“合作性统治”模式维持运转。我们通过对早期铭文和财政记录的细读,揭示了这种双重治理的复杂性。 2. 军事定居与土地分配: 苏丹国的扩张依赖于部落的迁移和定居。本书探讨了“伊克塔”(Iqta’)制度在安纳托利亚的早期演变。与经典的土地分封制不同,安纳托利亚的伊克塔往往与前线的军事需求紧密挂钩,并在很大程度上被地方化的军事领主(如“阿拜”(Aba))所主导。这种制度的泛滥,对中央财政体系构成了早期挑战,也为后来的地方割据埋下了伏笔。 3. 宗教与法律的交织: 在这一阶段,伊斯兰教的传播速度远慢于政治控制的扩张。苏丹国如何处理数量庞大的东正教和亚美尼亚教会社区的司法权和财产权?我们考察了苏丹颁布的早期“札兹亚”(Jizya,人头税)的征收标准,以及苏丹的宗教裁决机构(卡迪制度)在多大程度上介入了非穆斯林社区内部的民事纠纷。 第二部分:帝国的巩固与文化转型(1150-1243) 在中期,科尼亚苏丹国开始展现出真正的国家构建能力,尤其是在基利吉·阿尔斯兰二世和凯霍斯鲁二世统治时期。这一时期是苏丹国在行政、商业和文化上趋于“波斯化”和“伊斯兰化”的关键阶段。 1. 财政与商业的重构: 面对十字军国家和新兴的商业力量(如威尼斯、热那亚)的挑战,苏丹国进行了重要的经济改革。本书重点分析了港口城市(如安塔利亚、塞利夫凯)的控制权争夺,以及苏丹如何通过建立官方的商业信贷网络和商队驿站(Caravansaries)来促进长途贸易。我们详细描述了丝绸之路和地中海贸易网络如何被苏丹国的税收体系所吸纳。 2. 宫廷文化与行政精英的崛起: 随着突厥部落精英的定居,苏丹国宫廷的文化倾向日益明显地转向波斯化的行政传统。本书研究了“维齐尔”(Vizierate)阶层的专业化过程,以及他们如何引入波斯化的文学、诗歌和行政术语来巩固统治的合法性。这一时期,苏菲主义思潮开始深入人心,为苏丹国的意识形态提供了新的粘合剂,尤其是在与东正教社区的互动中。 3. 拜占庭遗产的再利用: 苏丹国对被占领的拜占庭精英及其知识分子采取了更为精细的拉拢政策。我们考察了苏丹在建筑、医学和哲学领域对君士坦丁堡、特拉布宗知识人才的引进,这种人才的吸收并非简单的抄袭,而是对现有拜占庭技术基础的重新定向和伊斯兰教义框架下的再解释。 第三部分:内部的张力与外部的冲击(1243-1308) 1243年的克塞达赫战役(Kösedağ)是苏丹国历史的转折点,它削弱了中央权威,并使苏丹国在很大程度上屈服于蒙古的宗主权。 1. 蒙古宗主权下的政治碎片化: 本章分析了蒙古“大汗之名”如何被用作安纳托利亚地方权力的合法性来源。苏丹国不再是一个统一的政治实体,而是演变为多个军事贵族(穆奥丁,Mua’yyid)和突厥化的蒙古总督(如贾拉勒王朝的残余势力)角力的舞台。我们详述了“贝伊里”(Beyliks)的出现,以及它们如何利用中央的衰弱,开始推行更具地域性和军事化的统治模式。 2. 经济与社会结构的瓦解: 蒙古人的劫掠和无休止的征兵需求,对苏丹国的商业网络造成了毁灭性打击。本书展示了城市贸易的萎缩,以及农村地区游牧化和军事化的回潮。信仰的相对宽松政策开始受到更激进、更具地方色彩的伊斯兰教团体的挑战,这些团体往往将苏丹国的软弱归咎于其精英阶层的“不纯正”。 3. 奥斯曼的崛起与终结: 最后的章节聚焦于苏丹国权力中心科尼亚的缓慢衰落,以及在半岛边缘地带(如比提尼亚地区)的奥斯曼部落的崛起。我们分析了奥斯曼人如何有效地吸收了苏丹国衰亡后遗留下来的行政人员、军事力量和流亡的塞尔柱贵族,并成功地将自身定位为“加齐”(Ghazi,边境战士)的合法继承者,从而完成了安纳托利亚从“科尼亚苏丹国”到“奥斯曼公国”的权力和平或半和平的过渡。 结论:一个未完成的转型 本书认为,塞尔柱科尼亚苏丹国是一次不彻底的、半成功的国家构建尝试。它成功地将突厥军事力量固定在安纳托利亚,并奠定了伊斯兰化的基调,但它始终未能完全解决如何在异质化的人口结构中,建立起一个稳定、可预测的、依赖于专业官僚而非个人军事忠诚的行政体系的根本难题。其遗产最终被更具凝聚力和军事驱动力的后继者们所继承和改造。本书旨在提供对这一关键过渡期更细致入微的理解,超越单纯的王朝更迭叙事。

作者简介

目录信息

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

The title "Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia" alone sets a powerful stage for historical exploration. Anatolia, as a geographical and cultural bridge between East and West, has witnessed countless waves of migration, conquest, and cultural exchange. The Seljuks, a significant Turkic dynasty, had established a powerful presence in the region, leaving their own indelible mark. The advent of the Mongol Empire, however, ushered in a new era, characterized by vast conquests and a profound reorganization of political structures across Eurasia. I am particularly interested in how this "rule" was implemented and what its consequences were for the existing Seljuk polity and the diverse populations of Anatolia. Was it a period of destruction and subjugation, or did it lead to new forms of integration and dynamism? The book's focus on this specific nexus of Mongol power and Seljuk Anatolia suggests an in-depth examination of the administrative, economic, and social transformations that occurred during this crucial phase of history.

评分

这本书的封面设计就足够吸引我了,那是一种古老而又充满力量的美感,深邃的蓝色背景上,隐约可见的蒙古骑兵剪影,再配以一种带有历史厚重感的字体,瞬间就让我联想到了那段波澜壮阔的岁月。我知道这本书的标题是《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》,这个题目本身就充满了信息量,勾勒出了一个特定时间和空间的交汇点。安纳托利亚,这个在地理上连接欧亚大陆的战略要地,在历史上曾是无数文明碰撞、融合的舞台。而塞尔柱王朝,一个曾经在中东和近东地区呼风唤雨的强大帝国,在历史的长河中扮演了重要的角色。当这两个名词被“蒙古统治”这个词连接起来时,一个更宏大的叙事便在我脑海中展开了。我很好奇,当那个席卷亚欧大陆、以铁蹄和征服著称的蒙古帝国,将其触角伸向了塞尔柱王朝统治下的安纳托利亚时,究竟发生了什么?是彻底的毁灭,还是某种形式的共存与演变?这本书无疑是在试图解答这些我一直以来都非常感兴趣的问题。单从书名来看,它就预示着一场关于权力、文化、冲突与适应的深刻探讨。

评分

在翻阅《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》这本书的目录和前言时,我立刻被作者的切入点所吸引。它不仅仅满足于讲述一个简单的征服故事,而是似乎在探究一种更为微妙而深远的“统治”概念。在我个人的认知中,历史上的“统治”并非总是直接的军事压迫,它也可能包含着经济掠夺、文化同化、甚至是基于现有政治框架的改造与利用。安纳托利亚在那个时期,本身就是一个文化和民族构成极为多元的地区,塞尔柱人、当地的希腊人、亚美尼亚人、库尔德人,以及后来可能涌入的蒙古人及其附属部落,都在这片土地上生活。蒙古人的到来,无疑为这种本已复杂的社会结构注入了新的变数。我非常期待书中能够详细分析蒙古统治对安纳托利亚社会经济的影响,比如贸易路线的改变、赋税制度的变化、以及对宗教和文化政策的态度。这种统治是破坏性的,还是在某种程度上也促进了地区的发展与交流?这些都是我希望在这本书中找到答案的关键问题。

评分

The title, "Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia," immediately conjures images of a significant historical transition, a turning point where established powers faced a new, formidable force. Anatolia, with its rich tapestry of cultures and its strategic importance, has always been a region of immense historical interest. The Seljuks had carved out a significant domain there, and their reign was a crucial chapter in the region's development. The arrival of the Mongols, however, represented a seismic shift, a force that reshaped the geopolitical landscape of the era. What intrigues me most is the nature of this "rule." Was it an outright conquest and imposition of foreign authority, or a more intricate system of suzerainty and influence? I am eager to learn about the specific ways in which Mongol dominance manifested itself in Seljuk Anatolia. Did it involve a complete overhaul of the existing administration, or did it entail a more subtle integration of Mongol authority into the existing Seljuk framework? The book's focus on this particular interaction between two major historical players promises a deep dive into the complexities of power, governance, and adaptation in a turbulent period.

评分

我之所以对《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》这本书产生了浓厚的兴趣,很大程度上是因为我对中世纪东西方交流史的着迷。历史上,蒙古帝国的扩张无疑是那个时代最显著的全球性事件之一,它深刻地改变了世界政治格局、贸易路线,甚至文化和社会结构。而安纳托利亚,作为连接拜占庭帝国、阿拉伯世界以及远东商业网络的桥梁,其在地缘政治上的重要性不言而喻。塞尔柱王朝在这个时期扮演的角色,更是充满了复杂性。当蒙古的铁骑踏足这片土地,一个原本稳定(或至少相对稳定)的政治实体必然会经历剧烈的动荡。我迫切想知道的是,这种“统治”是以何种方式体现的?是直接的军事占领和行政管理,还是通过扶植傀儡政权,或者是某种更为间接的经济和政治影响力?这本书的标题暗示了它将聚焦于一个特定的“统治”阶段,这意味着作者可能对这一时期塞尔柱王朝内部的权力结构、社会变迁以及与蒙古统治者之间的互动关系进行了深入的研究。我相信,这本书将不仅仅是关于一场军事征服,更会是一次对权力如何在不同文化和政治体系之间传递、转化和适应的精彩呈现。

评分

The phrase "Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia" resonates with a sense of historical grandeur and profound transformation. Anatolia, a land rich in history and strategically vital, was under the dominion of the Seljuk Turks, who had forged a significant empire. The subsequent arrival of the Mongol Empire, a force that reshaped the political map of the world, inevitably brought about a fundamental alteration of power structures in Anatolia. My curiosity is piqued by the nature and extent of this "rule." How did the Mongols assert their authority over the Seljuk territories? Did they dismantle the Seljuk administrative system entirely, or did they find ways to govern through it? The book's exploration of this specific historical juncture, where the vast Mongol Empire intersected with the established Seljuk presence in Anatolia, promises to unveil a fascinating chapter of regional history, shedding light on the complexities of imperial expansion and its impact on local governance and societal development.

评分

When I first encountered the title "Mongol Rule in Seljuk Anatolia," my mind immediately began to construct narratives of power, change, and adaptation. Anatolia, throughout history, has been a vibrant stage for the interplay of empires and cultures. The Seljuk period itself was a complex era, marked by both consolidation and internal dynamics. The arrival of the Mongol forces, however, represented a monumental shift, a disruption of established order on an unprecedented scale. I am eager to understand the specifics of this "rule." How did the Mongol overlords govern the Anatolian territories previously under Seljuk control? Did they establish their own administrative apparatus from scratch, or did they adapt and co-opt existing Seljuk institutions? Furthermore, I am keen to learn about the economic implications of this Mongol presence. Did it facilitate new trade routes, impose new tax regimes, or lead to widespread economic disruption? The book's promise to illuminate this specific period of interaction between these two historical powers is what draws me in.

评分

从《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》这个书名来看,它显然是在探索一个跨越文明和政治阵营的关键时期。安纳托利亚,这个在地理上处于东西方十字路口的地区,自古以来就是各种力量交汇的焦点。塞尔柱王朝,作为伊斯兰世界的重要政治力量,其统治下的安纳托利亚,拥有着独特的文化和宗教特征。而蒙古帝国,以其无与伦比的军事力量和广阔的疆域,改变了整个欧亚大陆的历史走向。这本书将焦点放在了这两者相遇的特定时空,无疑是为了揭示蒙古人是如何渗透并影响了塞尔柱在安纳托利亚的统治。我期待作者能够深入分析这种“统治”的性质。它是直接的军事征服和政治接管,还是通过间接的影响和权力扶植?蒙古人是否会带来他们原有的管理体系,或者他们会选择适应并利用塞尔柱已有的行政结构?书中对于安纳托利亚地区内部,不同民族、宗教群体以及社会阶层在这一转变时期的经历和反应的描写,将是判断这本书价值的重要标准。

评分

《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》这个书名, immediately sparks a sense of historical intrigue for me. The very juxtaposition of "Mongol Rule" and "Seljuk Anatolia" suggests a pivotal moment where two immense historical forces collided and interacted. Anatolia, as a crossroads of civilizations, has always been a fascinating region for me, a place where East meets West, and where empires rise and fall. The Seljuk Turks had established a significant presence and political entity there, shaping its culture and identity. Then came the Mongols, a force of nature that swept across vast swathes of Asia and Europe, leaving an indelible mark on history. I'm keen to understand the nuances of this "rule." Was it a direct subjugation, a vassal state arrangement, or something more complex? What were the mechanisms of Mongol control in this specific context? Did they impose their own administrative systems, or did they work through existing Seljuk structures? The book's promise to delve into this particular period of transition and power dynamics in Anatolia is what makes it so compelling to me.

评分

读到《蒙古统治在塞尔柱安纳托利亚》这个书名,我脑海中立刻浮现出一幅画面:辽阔的草原上,无数马蹄扬起尘土,一支强大的力量正向着富饶的安纳托利亚腹地挺进。我知道,历史的车轮滚滚向前,但每一次重大的历史转折,都离不开那些深刻影响时代进程的人物和事件。塞尔柱帝国,作为一个曾经辉煌的穆斯林王朝,其统治下的安纳托利亚,在宗教、文化和政治上都形成了一定的格局。而蒙古人的出现,则如同投入平静湖面的一块巨石,激起了层层涟漪。这本书的标题,精准地捕捉到了这个历史的关键节点。我好奇的是,蒙古人的“统治”是如何在塞尔柱王朝的旧有体系上叠加的?是完全的颠覆,还是在原有基础上进行整合和改造?例如,蒙古人是否保留了塞尔柱的行政机构,或者只是设立了新的管理层级?他们对塞尔柱的宗教信仰和文化传统持何种态度?这些细节的呈现,将决定我对这一时期历史理解的深度和广度。

评分

不错的说orz 感觉有兴趣的聚聚们可以进一步阅读一些相关编年史的说orz(比如伊本.比比的《塞尔柱书》或佚名作者所撰写的《安纳托利亚塞尔柱人史》,不过豆瓣上好像没有这两本书呢。。。) ıbnı bibi,anadolu selçukı devleti tarihi,Ankara,1941(土耳其语译本) Anonymous,Tārīkh-i Āl-i Saljūq dar Ānāṭūlī,Tehran.,1999(波斯语刊本)

评分

不错的说orz 感觉有兴趣的聚聚们可以进一步阅读一些相关编年史的说orz(比如伊本.比比的《塞尔柱书》或佚名作者所撰写的《安纳托利亚塞尔柱人史》,不过豆瓣上好像没有这两本书呢。。。) ıbnı bibi,anadolu selçukı devleti tarihi,Ankara,1941(土耳其语译本) Anonymous,Tārīkh-i Āl-i Saljūq dar Ānāṭūlī,Tehran.,1999(波斯语刊本)

评分

不错的说orz 感觉有兴趣的聚聚们可以进一步阅读一些相关编年史的说orz(比如伊本.比比的《塞尔柱书》或佚名作者所撰写的《安纳托利亚塞尔柱人史》,不过豆瓣上好像没有这两本书呢。。。) ıbnı bibi,anadolu selçukı devleti tarihi,Ankara,1941(土耳其语译本) Anonymous,Tārīkh-i Āl-i Saljūq dar Ānāṭūlī,Tehran.,1999(波斯语刊本)

评分

不错的说orz 感觉有兴趣的聚聚们可以进一步阅读一些相关编年史的说orz(比如伊本.比比的《塞尔柱书》或佚名作者所撰写的《安纳托利亚塞尔柱人史》,不过豆瓣上好像没有这两本书呢。。。) ıbnı bibi,anadolu selçukı devleti tarihi,Ankara,1941(土耳其语译本) Anonymous,Tārīkh-i Āl-i Saljūq dar Ānāṭūlī,Tehran.,1999(波斯语刊本)

评分

不错的说orz 感觉有兴趣的聚聚们可以进一步阅读一些相关编年史的说orz(比如伊本.比比的《塞尔柱书》或佚名作者所撰写的《安纳托利亚塞尔柱人史》,不过豆瓣上好像没有这两本书呢。。。) ıbnı bibi,anadolu selçukı devleti tarihi,Ankara,1941(土耳其语译本) Anonymous,Tārīkh-i Āl-i Saljūq dar Ānāṭūlī,Tehran.,1999(波斯语刊本)

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有