Architectural form reconsidered in light of a unitary conception of architecture and the city.
In The Possibility of an Absolute Architecture, Pier Vittorio Aureli proposes that a sharpened formal consciousness in architecture is a precondition for political, cultural, and social engagement with the city. Aureli uses the term absolute not in the conventional sense of "pure," but to denote something that is resolutely itself after being separated from its other. In the pursuit of the possibility of an absolute architecture, the other is the space of the city, its extensive organization, and its government. Politics is agonism through separation and confrontation; the very condition of architectural form is to separate and be separated. Through its act of separation and being separated, architecture reveals at once the essence of the city and the essence of itself as political form: the city as the composition of (separate) parts. Aureli revisits the work of four architects whose projects were advanced through the making of architectural form but whose concern was the city at large: Andrea Palladio, Giovanni Battista Piranesi, Étienne Louis-Boullée, and Oswald Mathias Ungers. The work of these architects, Aureli argues, addressed the transformations of the modern city and its urban implications through the elaboration of specific and strategic architectural forms. Their projects for the city do not take the form of an overall plan but are expressed as an "archipelago" of site-specific interventions.
The idea of differentiating URBANIZATION and CITY, and re-constructing the knowledge of architecture and city is - as Peter Eisenman put - radical and provocative, also ambitious. But I'm not convinced by the following historical digging and re-articulating...
评分The idea of differentiating URBANIZATION and CITY, and re-constructing the knowledge of architecture and city is - as Peter Eisenman put - radical and provocative, also ambitious. But I'm not convinced by the following historical digging and re-articulating...
评分The idea of differentiating URBANIZATION and CITY, and re-constructing the knowledge of architecture and city is - as Peter Eisenman put - radical and provocative, also ambitious. But I'm not convinced by the following historical digging and re-articulating...
评分The idea of differentiating URBANIZATION and CITY, and re-constructing the knowledge of architecture and city is - as Peter Eisenman put - radical and provocative, also ambitious. But I'm not convinced by the following historical digging and re-articulating...
评分The idea of differentiating URBANIZATION and CITY, and re-constructing the knowledge of architecture and city is - as Peter Eisenman put - radical and provocative, also ambitious. But I'm not convinced by the following historical digging and re-articulating...
last summer missed Aureli at gsapp.
评分建筑是现代城市背景下,组织劳动力与激发生产力的政治工具。
评分唉哟,真是太牛逼了,形式升到了另一个维度。
评分第一次在建筑语境中用“绝对”一词,pv“绝对”的意义应该在“分离”,是一种stop-city在与城市化过程的内部对抗中寻求的某种分离,这种分离的意义在本篇以及他的自主性那部著作中已经做好了理论阐述,然而现实中具体的可实施性问题现在势必需要用他所说的策略性方案提供一个多元的决策向度,协商,并加以论证,其“绝对”的意义,在空间的实践spatial practice过程中将如何再现
评分A historical overview of “autonomy of architecture” / “projects of the city”, and covers the topics after Collage City (1978), Delirious New York (1978), Bigness (1995), and some others. It views fragmentation of the contemporary built- environment from a different perspective.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有