具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
1950s-1960s: homophile organizations, interest group politics; 1969-1971: collaborate with the New Left, "coming out" as strategy, swing between redistributive political logic and identity political logic; 1970s-: crystallization into identity logic 对identity的分析强调diversity in unity，但也指出所谓unity遮蔽了内部的少数者，似乎可以就二者之间的张力对identity politics的走向做更深的讨论，总感觉没说透
评分1950s-1960s: homophile organizations, interest group politics; 1969-1971: collaborate with the New Left, "coming out" as strategy, swing between redistributive political logic and identity political logic; 1970s-: crystallization into identity logic 对identity的分析强调diversity in unity，但也指出所谓unity遮蔽了内部的少数者，似乎可以就二者之间的张力对identity politics的走向做更深的讨论，总感觉没说透
评分我自己读了是挺受用的……目前还不知道怎么argue back。
评分我自己读了是挺受用的……目前还不知道怎么argue back。
评分1950s-1960s: homophile organizations, interest group politics; 1969-1971: collaborate with the New Left, "coming out" as strategy, swing between redistributive political logic and identity political logic; 1970s-: crystallization into identity logic 对identity的分析强调diversity in unity，但也指出所谓unity遮蔽了内部的少数者，似乎可以就二者之间的张力对identity politics的走向做更深的讨论，总感觉没说透
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有